SoCal Deek

Honest Question: What is it that makes him a “terrorist” in your eyes? I’m not saying I disagree with you Tibs, but we need to share a common language if we’re all going to have a conversation.

I’ve tried to stay out of this discussion because I knew where it would go….as usual. But looking at it from the proverbial 35,000 feet, doesn’t anyone find it odd it that sitting members of Congress would feel this threatened by a single cable television program expressing an opinion, telling a narrative, and showing actual, unaltered video footage of an actual news event? When did America “evolve” into a country where the government controlled the way the press/media/people are allowed to see and discuss a news story? EVERYONE should be REALLY frightened by this unfortunate turn of events. It does not bode well for the future of a formerly free country.

Edmunds? Nope…doesn’t ring a bell. Let me google him.

Is the small incursion over yet? I think I dosed off.

Not a chance. I’m not going to blame you. I’m not a liberal nutcase looking to blame others for my lot in life. But yes please keep pushing those false Trump narratives. We need you on that wall. It’s just a shame your wall is the one surrounding your mental institution. 😉

Keep it up! You prove you’re wrong with each new post.

As I mentioned yesterday the most compelling video was that of the congressman running from the chamber. That was clearly edited to show something that was the complete OPPOSITE of what the actual footage showed.

As with others on here you are completely missing the point of Tucker’s reporting. He is NOT trying to excuse the rioters. He’s exposing the Select Committee’s cherry picked narrative.

With all due respect, having Congress produce a television show that flat out lies to the American public in order to advance a narrative aimed at castrating their political opponents is hardly nothing. This thing makes Trump’s phone call to the President of Ukraine look like a preschool production.

The most important example of the clips Tucker showed was NOT of the protestors, but was the edited clip of the congressional representatives running from the chamber. The clips were edited to make it look as if only one member was running away, but the entire clip reveals that not only was he not the ONLY member running away, but he was NOT in the lead. In fact, all of the members were following the direction of the Capitol Police and the member in question was actually bringing up the rear. Shame on the Committee and on anyone who listened to a word they had to say after seeing that example! Don’t believe or agree with me. Consider this….a jury just sent Murdoch away for LIFE for lying about video evidence.

You’ve really got to be kidding. Yet another person who’s utterly lost. Sad.

Believe what exactly? All he said was that the Committee clearly lied to the American people. And they did!

So does this mean Peterman still has a chance?

Thanks for the great explanation. You guys know a lot more about this stuff than I will ever hope to.

Once again you are missing the ENTIRE point. Tucker isn’t attempting to ‘try the case’ on his TV Show. He’s merely showing that what you were allowed to see by the so-called Select Committee was incredibly edited to present a one-sided narrative to the nation…without any opposition. I pray to God that you NEVER sit on a jury, as you appear to be the sort that would recommend going into deliberations right after the prosecution rests.

With all due respect, you’re missing the point of the thread. The J6 Committee clearly edited the tapes to present a selective narrative to the public, and passed them off as facts. You can see that, right? It doesn’t make what any of the protesters did that day right or make them blameless but it says a ton about that total sham of a politically motivated committee.

Yikes. You’re completely lost.

Quick! Someone tell him Frazier is taking a sabbatical. Or…maybe that’s why he chose unfollow the Bills. 😳

I still can’t help but wonder what Adams is thinking having left Green Bay to go play with Carr, his college roommate, in Vegas.

I really don’t care where or when they get them but I’d be thrilled if the Bills selected a couple of young, stud Offensive Guards to anchor the O Line for the duration of Josh’s contract. I’ve said it before, it’s not sexy, but it’ll make everything else so much easier for many years to come.

I have zero Super Bowl expectations. The Bills are a very good team, but definitely not a great team. It’s fun to watch them be competitive week after week but I’ve yet to see anything that shows me they’re ready to win a championship. (Sorry)

I think often overlooked is the fact that if Brady was still in NE, Frazier would’ve been gone well before last week.

Anybody see the movie Easy A? One of a number of classic lines is when the teacher asks Emma Stone “when are you kids going to learn not to post your every waking thought online”? Yikes, does that apply to this ‘doctor’!

They aren’t necessarily greedy. If you never learn how to handle money, it makes absolutely no difference how much of it you have. Words to live by!

Priority One…..fix the Offensive Line! It may not be sexy but it’ll quietly pay dividends for as long as Josh is a healthy Buffalo Bill. (Let’s first see what Free Agency has in store.)