Success

It's too early to panic....it's too early to panic....it's too early to panic....

I hated that so much. Last 20 seconds of a losing game.

Kelce looked SLOW. He looked a bit out of shape, also. It will be interesting to see if he's as dominant as he has been in the past. Are you suggesting that Kelce can be a top tight-end for 8 more years, or anything close to that?

No we wouldn't. Mahomes isn't better than Allen.

History always gets rewritten. Had we picked Mahomes, this board would have gone crazy. And not in a good way.

"Will this be the year?" Even though we're supposedly taking a step back....you know you're thinking it.

Fantastic run from Pegula - she took a huge step forward w/ this tournament. Sabalenka is just better right now, and a great player.

How am I supposed to feel about Robert Kraft cheering on Pegula?

When after watching the Harmon drop, 4 SB losses in a row, wide right, the Music City Miracle, losing to Pittsburgh's back-ups to miss the playoffs, the Losman/Edwards debate, the MNF game against Dallas, 13 seconds, and another wide right this past season - you still go into every single season stoked and saying "this is the year." And I'm sure I left out about a dozen brutal, heartbreaking losses that have names.

The draft can't be mainly about blocking rivals from getting players.

When you need a #1 and have to replace Diggs? Maybe horror is extreme, but it's not what we needed. He is a complementary piece in KC's offense, and he'd be the same here. Our needs were different.

And we'd be stuck w/ a great speed guy who would never have a chance to replace Diggs or be our #1.

This is excessively negative.

The speed is incredible - he's fast. But we knew that, as did the other teams that passed on him. Aside from the 2 big plays (and I know he also changed the defense), he wasn't targeted much. I'm curious to see how it goes the rest of the season, especially after Brown comes back.

I don't think he's that good for KC. How many times will they be punting from deep in their own territory? He's not a good placement punter.

He wasn't. I failed in that part of the OP & got my players mixed up.

We should trade down w/ KC if there is a player they really want and that will make them even better. I want to start punking America.

Kind of - but I think it's out the window if it makes sense in terms of improving our own team, without improving the rival too much. I can see where people will end up thinking we improved KC at an unreasonable level - but I'd only counter that it's all a calculation. Would Worthy have fallen to them anyway? Would whatever receiver they got if we hadn't traded been significantly worse than Worthy in their offense? That doesn't make sense. Coleman - like Worthy - is a starter.

Can't it just be a trade that could potentially work out for both teams? This thread is about hot-take, lunatic America freaking out after 1 quarter of play on "why did the stupid Bills let KC get Worthy?" I hope we never have a GM who decides against a trade that could benefit the Buffalo Bills simply because it involves Kansas City. That's making business decisions and decisions about the quality of our team based on nothing more than perception, or trying to avoid the aforementioned lunatic hot-takes. Let's say we stand pat, don't get the extra pick, and the Niners take Worthy, so KC loses out on him. Are we really to believe that whatever receiver they ended up taking in the 1st round wouldn't have made some nice plays last night?

Oh, damn. That's embarrassing. You are correct, sir.

I get the perception. But "as of today" is literally 1 game into the season. Before the Bills have even had a snap. These kinds of trades are RATIONALLY evaluated after at minimum one full season, but usually a few seasons.

5-12 is crazy. I get we lost a lot of guys - but 5-12? At least we're not being overhyped by many. This is as under-the-radar as we have been since JA's first couple of years. No one is really talking about us. And that suits me just fine.

I wouldn't call that apples to apples. I think the characterization you presented on that is accurate. Not trading on draft day w/ KC - when it benefits you, but you just don't want a perception of helping KC - is more playing scared, imo.

I don't know. To me, that's playing scared. That's completely adjusting your draft and costing yourself an extra player (in this case, Cole Bishop - a safety we really need), because you're so intimidated and psychologically worn down by another team.

I don't see it as a nightmare. To me, it's just another test for this organization and fanbase - another challenge. It's a higher wall we probably have to climb. But that will make the payoff even better. We'd all love to be fat & happy and have a couple of Lombardi's in the trophy case right now, but there is something that's still fun about the chase, at least for me.