Jump to content

Royale with Cheese

Community Member
  • Posts

    25,211
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Royale with Cheese

  1. Interesting that some of the Rams players said they were glad to have Sammy because now they had somebody that defenses have to play over the top. Translation: respect the deep pass. But what do they know. They only play the game. Pretty sure they had other guys on the roster playing wr. Guys who couldnt get deep consistently.

     

    I'm pretty sure, Tavon Austin who they took in the 1st round in 2013 and runs a 4.27 can get deep.

  2.  

    There is no one open on that play. No one.

    My goodness Mills is terrible.

     

    Here you go Coach.

     

    In this photo, you can see both Clay on the inside on top and Matthews on the inside on the bottom.

    This is a still photo of Taylor's 3rd step on the drop.

    Clay up top doesn't have anyone within 5 yards of him on the break. Taylor holds it.

    Matthew breaks and is open. The linebacker isn't even facing his direction.

    Clean pocket.

     

    Taylor%20miss%20to%20Carolina_zpsaylskfx

     

    Here is another frame roughly about 1 second later. Judging by the timer, this is about 3 seconds holding the ball.

    Now Clay is no longer open. Both the Kuechly and the defensive back now are converging on Clay.

    Matthews is still open.

    Since Kuechly is now giving up his position to go towards Clay....Zay Jones on the outside gets open on the deep slant.

    Still a clean pocket....Taylor still not having to move and eyes down field.

     

     

    Taylor%20miss%20to%20Carolina%202_zpsfrc

  3. Why?

     

    I guarantee you're reading all of YPP's commentary and factoring in those comments as you watch the clips.

     

    This is why you should watch these plays without the commentary.

     

     

    The tweet you just posted they said "I just don't understand why the ball isn't being thrown."

     

     

    The exact same play posted on cover1's breakdown of All-22:

     

    "Double tosser concept again on 3rd-long. Daring him to throw it underneath. Pump fakes to get it to Clay but not there. Gets to Shady for Fg"

     

     

    Time to start thinking for ourselves folks!

    This wasn't a double crosser....

  4.  

    I actually think the question is:

     

    If your plan was to keep Tyrod at QB, and you wanted him to be successful, then why did you trade Sammy Watkins and get rid of Marquise Goodwin, and--as a corollary--if your plan was to operate a timing-based passing attack that did not require receivers like Watkins or a deep threat like Goodwin, why did you decide to keep Tyrod Taylor?

    I agree with your question.

  5. What a bunch of whiners you guys are.

     

    Did you watch the game? Did you know the Bills' power running attack? This is a running team, and they couldn't run at all. The only person who made plays on offense was Tyrod.

     

    The offensive line stunk. Absolutely stunk. That might be coaching, that might be talent. One thing is certain - blocking is NOT Tyrod's job.

     

    Tyrod completed a high percentage. He threw no INTs. He did largely what he was asked to do, and all you guys can do is whine about him.

     

    The run blocking stunk because it was easy to see what Carolina was doing. I watched the front 7 crash down on every play because they focused on stopping the run and didn't respect the pass. Tyrod wasn't under duress the entire game passing the ball.

     

    High percentage because we averaged 5.0 yards per pass play and 2.5 per attempt in the air.

  6.  

    lol. I don't care what you may think of the site on a personal level. Ranking players that play on a team sport, by its very nature, is subjective. Any site, any ranking system, no matter how good it is, is going to be flawed. All I said was that teams are actually paying for this information, so for people to say it's "garbage" is ridiculous. I'll leave it at that.

    lol. sorry man. :(

     

    It's not just me who is calling it garbage...

    I'll leave it at that.

  7. I don't know, and you don't know. All I said is that 27 teams are clients of PFF. If you need me to show you more than that, I'm sorry. Maybe the janitor is subscribing? Would that make you happy?

     

    You guys are utterly ridiculous with your agendas. I say 27 teams subscribe to PFF and you want me to tell you who shot JFK.

     

     

     

    Correct me if I'm wrong but you are letting me know that 27 teams us PFF because you wanted to show that my opinion on this site could be inaccurate?

    And you're right...we both don't know who is using it which I said in the previous post.

     

    I'm just countering your response. What's wrong with that?

     

    I've been openly critical about this site since they graded Demetress Bell as one of the best LT's in football back in like 2009. It wasn't on here so you don't know.

    My agenda is against the site overall, not about how they specifically grade Bills players.

    Happy?

  8.  

    And yet, 27 NFL teams pay PFF for their broadcast view information.

     

    Does anyone pay you for your NFL insight?

     

    You don't know who is using these subscriptions and it's only $26.99. For all you know, it could be the teams media department using this.

    Please let me know if these 27 coaches are openly praising this website.

     

    I don't need to be paid to say Taylor's performance yesterday was bad. Or even worse, better than Aaron Rodgers 5 TD performance.

    Call me crazy but I think Rodgers had a better game.

     

    TJ Lang isn't the only one who openly criticized this website.

     

    http://www.freep.com/story/sports/nfl/lions/2017/09/14/detroit-lions-tj-lang-pro-football-focus/666136001/

     

    “I think it’s absolute garbage and I think most players do," Lang said.

    Pro Football Focus is a football analysis website that focuses on advanced analytics (think along the lines of MLB's sabermetrics) to grade players and teams based on their performances each week, snap by snap.

    While it's a helpful tool for football experts - and even some NFL front offices that buy its proprietary data from PFF - Lang believes it doesn't take everything about a given play into full context.

    “My opinion is there’s no way you can possibly accurately grade offensive linemen if you haven’t done that job before in your life. A lot of these guys, they’re not qualified to be grading NFL players,” Lang told Valenti, as transcribed by CBS Detroit. “A lot of the stuff I realize is pretty basic, obvious information. If I clearly just get whooped and let up a sack, you can say, ‘Yeah, that guy let up a sack.'

    “But they don’t know anything about identification, what offensive linemen are supposed to do. They think if a guy blitzes off the edge, that’s automatically the tackle’s block, but a lot of times that’s not the case. They’ve always graded me well, which I don’t mind, but I still don’t respect it."

  9. Translation: if they dont support my hatred of Tyrod, they suck

     

    LOL.

     

    PFF says Taylor's game yesterday was better than this Rodgers performance.

     

     

    Rodgers completed 24-of-35 passes for 333 yards and five touchdown passes against zero interceptions, good for a 138.5 passer rating. But PFF, which grades every player’s performance on every play according to its more nuanced model, saw it differently. Take a look at how Rodgers, who graded a negative 0.8 for the game....

     

    http://www.foxsports.com/buzzer/story/pff-aaron-rodgers-negative-grade-packers-chiefs-mnf-092915

     

    Do you know how PFF grades performances? These guys watch the game on NFL Rewind and with broadcast view. Not film, broadcast view like you and I watch it from TV.

×
×
  • Create New...