Royale with Cheese
-
Posts
25,767 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Royale with Cheese
-
-
Elijah Moore averaged 60 receptions for the last two seasons with QB’s in Cleveland. For him not to have really any production here is weird.
He gets open. He has speed. He has good hands.
I think Brady overthinks and doesn’t take the obvious.
Palmer and Moore should have good production in this offense.
-
3
-
3
-
1
-
-
On 11/4/2025 at 7:18 AM, QCity said:
Yeah, ok buddy.
You shot up before your free agent year and f**ked us. There's an out in your contract after 2026 when we can dump your ass but nobody on the roster is getting younger right now when we need you.
But don't worry people, if we lose in the playoffs "all defeat is psychological"
Someone pissed in your Cheerios this morning.
-
5 minutes ago, IYKYK said:
Our advisor moved some money into AI a year ago and the results have been very positive. There’s serious money to be made if you have good financial advisors who are on top of their game.
Yep. This is the time to get in.
He has one top investor who has put in like $3 million I believe.
18 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:Yep, it's sad, because these kids did everything right. We told them that computer science was the future, and now AI is pulling the rug out on them.
I told my kids the same thing, and I'm feeling kind of fortunate that they ignored my advice and wound up in fields that aren't impacted. At least "aren't impacted yet ..."
I knew this was going to happen years ago. My San Francisco friend keeps me up to date on technology.
He was at a IT event and saw a computer programming other computers. He told me front end developers and programmers are not going to be needed anymore in roughly 10 years.
It needs to be in AI. He's been right so far.
-
2
-
-
In hindsight, I should have invested all my liquid assets into Amazon 20 years ago.
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
I wonder if this is a perfect time to state that I have invested in an AI company? My best friend in San Francisco has developed an AI software program and has his second meeting with Apple. He met with them this past Monday and they called him back yesterday wanting a second meeting for next Friday to meet with more Leaders.
I'm trying not to get too excited.
-
Im like totally surprised.
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, Scott7975 said:
The fact is you can find reason for argument no matter what bias you would like to take. Our defense wasn't good enough. Our offense wasnt good enough. The Eagles defense was stacked and came in with a plan that worked.
Our D shut them out in the 3rd quarter. We came away with 6 points. In the 4th quarter we turned the ball over twice on downs. 9 plays 24 yards over 4 minutes of time. Gave them the ball back. That wasn't the game ending drive even. It was the 4th quarter starting drive. It killed almost 1/3 of the clock to get 24 yards and give them the ball back at almost midfield. Then we traded touchdowns. Then they got a field goal. Then we had the ball with all the time in the world to win the game on one last drive and we got 17 yards with 1 first down.
Was our D great? 100% no but it did well enough that our O had the ball with a chance to win the game and the fact is that it couldnt move the ball. I 100% put that game on the offense, just like I 100% put the 13 second game on the defense. Both sides have had a chance to close the game and neither could close.
The Chiefs offense went something like 2 seasons without putting up 30+ points.They averaged 22 ppg last year.
The Texans held the to 212 yards in the WC round. We know what the Eagles did to them.They scored TD’s on 3 of their first 4 drives against us. We gave up greater than 50% of 3rd downs.
Our defense sucked.
But yes, you are right we had a chance to win it. We had the ball last.-
1
-
1
-
-
43 minutes ago, NickelCity said:
I expected this joke to say married dads tbh
Yes!
-
All the divorced dad's have the same wrist injury as Bosa, specifically the right hand.
-
5
-
2
-
-
I didn't want to the Bills to pay Cook not because of Cook, just because of the RB position.
But seeing him play this year where they give him the workload, he's special. Definitely appreciate him now.
-
1 hour ago, BillsVet said:
I don't care.
Buffalo was second in points scored last year, third in point differential, etc. during the regular season. And they still barely got past Baltimore in the Divisional Round game and had to grind it out in the AFC CG.
The offense is built to succeed in the regular season and falters under the weight of greater expectations and pressure in the post-season.
"Barely got by Baltimore...."
You mean the team that was favored to beat us in the AFC Divisional round?
They were top 10 in both offense and defense. They had 4 All Pros.
LOL...even with a great win like that, you still try to find a way to make it like it wasn't a big playoff win.
Narratives.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, RunTheBall said:
I’d have preferred to trade for a guy, but it looks like Gabe will be the answer at that X receiver spot. I’m not a huge Gabe fan, but he’s light years better than Coleman. If you watch some All-22, whenever Keon was 1-1 outside, KC brought their safety into the box. Keon scares no one, they don’t even bother to keep a deep guy back that’s how little teams fear him. Gabe, on the other hand, will keep that safety up over the top. We know he can get open on deep posts, corners, and outs, those are the only 3 routes Gabe runs. That alone should open up the middle of the field a bit more even if Gabe is the #4 or #5 target. Yeah, not the best solution but I think it’s an improvement on Coleman who has been ASS
I was at the Falcons and Panthers game in the endzone 30 rows up. Have a perfect view.
In both games, the safeties were tight and giving up all kinds of space outside the hashes. Coleman was on an island, single covered.
Defenses do not care about him. They dare us to go outside with Coleman knowing we can't.
At least Davis can go downfield....that's pretty much it. He at least can make a play there when Coleman can't.
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, ScotSHO said:
Pro - Very good offensive numbers.
Con - Played the easy side of the schedule.
The best game we played was against the Super Bowl favorites.
-
2
-
4
-
-
1 minute ago, GunnerBill said:
I am not agreeing with that. I think he is 4th on the list, sure. But I think he is still in that tier. He was incredible last season and had his team been better he'd have been MVP.
He's a top 5 QB.
Yes, he has great weapons. But he's never had an offensive line and always under duress.
He's never had a defense so they're always in a shoot out.
He's extremely accurate but also extremely brittle.
-
3
-
-
15 minutes ago, pennstate10 said:
I agree that Hiecht was very impressive playing a DT/DE/LB hybrid position. Let’s call it animal.
I would also like to see the Bills continue to use this position.
I think Bosa would be the best candidate currently on the team. Same weight and frame as Hoecht, and maybe a bit more explosive. And he played LB at LAC.
The argument against this move is you would be weakening the DE group to have him play a position that he hasn’t played.
I think Milano and Williams are both too light at 230ish to line up at DT
Gotta disagree here.
Teams are playing heavy box to stop Bills run. They can do this because Bills don’t have a deep threat, or a WR that can separate in the intermediate area.
If Bills had a #1 outside receiver, the opponents would clog the LOS and middle much less.
I think Epenesa, Solomon and Dorian take that place.
Epenesa isn't as explosive as Hoecht but has the size. He does have a first quick step and long.....he does a good job of knocking the ball down.
Solomon and Dorian don't have the size but they have the speed. Speed makes interior lineman nervous.
I really liked seeing the speed on the inside this last week.
If the playoff defense is for 3rd and passing down situations....
Rousseau and Bosa on the ends.
Oliver/Dorian or Solomon or AJ on the inside.
That should generate a good rush.
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, BillsFan130 said:
I think a lot of fans just like to look at the last possession of the game and say: "Well we were down by 3 and couldn't score so it's the offenses fault we couldn't win".
True in a sense you would like more on the last drive.
But 29 points in arrowhead against that defence should be more than enough to win. Especially when KCs offence was a mess last year and they scored 32 against us
The next game, KC had 12 yards of offense at halftime against the Eagles. That’s how bad our defense was last year.-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:
Thank you, you’re finally getting it 😉. Have a blessed day brother I’ve got to work.
How in the hell did we score 29 with no talent and predictable offense against the Chiefs?Lets continue this conversation of how the Bills offense was the reason last year that we didn’t make it to the Super Bowl when you’re not working. Its fascinating.
You are the only one on the planet that will say the Bills offense is the reason why we didn’t go to the Super Bowl last year.
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:
100% it was. That’s exactly what we’re talking about here. It’s the only part of our team that works come playoff time and it came up short because of predictability and limited play makers. Did 29 points win it for us? Did running up the middle with Josh work for us? Did throwing up a prayer to Kincaid work for us? More legit weapons isn’t a bad thing brother. Sorry that you feel that it is. We can’t depend on our defense to win it for us in the playoffs so let’s invest in the side of the ball that actually works because of our HOF QB and make it less predictable and more dynamic come January.
“Its the only thing that works come playoff time but it came up short….” WTF?
100% of the reason why we lost to the Chiefs because of the offense…WOW!
30 ppg last year in the playoffs and the offense is the reason we lost.
Great argument.
-
Just now, NeverOutNick said:
Have we beat the chiefs in the playoffs yet? Have we gotten to a SB with this staff? Have we done enough to finally do either of those things? I don’t think so but here’s hoping 🙏🏻
Was it our offense that couldn’t get past KC? I mean, that’s what we are talking about right? -
3 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:
We are very predictable and come playoff time it will show again just like how we ran up the middle with Josh multiple times and it didn’t work, but we kept doing it our last playoff game. Good defensive coordinators will scheme against our limited bag of tricks. Sorry that you don’t see that.
Spaqs from KC isn’t a good DC?What about the 2024 Broncos who were number 1 in sacks with 63? How did we score 31 against them when we have absolutely nothing on offense?
-
2 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:
I have to believe you’re just being sarcastic because no way you can feel comfortable going into the playoffs again with this crop of wide receivers. You have to see that when we play elite teams and it’s actually playoff time the coaching staffs that are better than ours will box us up because there is no threat downfield and no one that can separate or even come down with a clutch catch. I love what James Cook has become for us and Shakir is always a reliable and I’m hopeful. Kincaid keeps getting better but do you really trust anyone else? Do you really think that adding better weapons would be a bad thing? Why stay stagnant? Is it because our arrogant GM wants to plant his flag on “We don’t need more talent at wide receiver”? I really don’t understand how anyone would poo poo the idea of getting better weapons for Josh regardless of all the propped up stats we are seeing early due to the line of scrimmage yards after catch plays that are working so far. That’s not gonna always work. You need guys who can actually run routes, you need guys who can actually stretch the field.
Man, you are sounding like this offense can’t score.
The objective truth is we are scoring this year and last playoffs. But you are saying we didn’t. That’s crazy. -
3 minutes ago, NeverOutNick said:
You’re missing the point. Stefon Diggs was becoming a cancer and didn’t buy into the everybody eats philosophy, but just because everybody eats doesn’t mean the people eating have to suck lol. We can have both great talent and philosophy, but choose not to. Imagine this team right now with Troy Franklin instead of Dwayne Carter and Tory Horton instead of Dorian Strong. We’d be able to stretch the field spread the ball around with a plethora of real weapons.
So scoring a franchise record amount of points last year and having the #1 offense so far this year is a strong indication that our offense isn’t good?
Its so bad we need more help or we will continue to suck? Is that the point you are making? -
13 hours ago, NeverOutNick said:
That’s fine but let’s see if this recipe finally works in the playoffs when it actually matters. Would be nice to stretch the field with someone other than an often injured TE
Did the recipe of having a #1 WR in Diggs work in the playoffs for a few years?14 hours ago, Big Turk said:The Bills are the #1 ranked offense in the NFL. I mean at some point people just have to accept they can be good in ways that they don't agree with and score a crap ton of points without having to throw 50 yard bombs.
Narratives are strong.
We broke our franchise record in points last year but our offense sucked.-
3
-
-
6 hours ago, Buffalo716 said:
Do you think you could record a sack in 149 snaps
100% certainty. If I stand behind Bosa, they’ll never see me. Im the ghost.-
1
-
Bills don't "need" a WR, they need to use the ones they have better
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
It seems Brady didn't believe in a traditional passing game. Then we did against the Chiefs and look what happened.
He wants to get cute and go against the grain. He's like "they'll never expect this" type of mindset.