Cherrybone

Already responding to the same question

No. Not at all. I have no problem with him saying it. It's just unbelievable considering the state of the bills.

I never mentioned anything about interest gangstas because I don't do the back and forth over the Internet that's to easy. Also if you have a problem with the quality of my threads you know you don't have to respond.

I agree about Boldin and that's why I can't believe he said he came to Buffalo to win a championship. Not trolling at all. I swear its a lot of Internet gangstas on this board. Lol

I just would love to know in what? I'm wondering if he thought those ping pong tables was still around. He must be great at ping pong. This team is nowhere near championship level at all. Watching this preseason game says a lot. Still undisciplined, receivers can't get separation (thanks a lot Beane) and Tyrod, oh boy. Where are the ones that's always advertising his QBR?

Thank definitely appreciate the heads up. Finally somebody reasonable enough to explain things without assuming that a person just want to start threads just for the sake of starting them. Thanks again

I kind of understand his explanation. However when you trade someone of Sammy's stature, wouldn't it only be right to discuss it with the head coach before you pull the trigger. Sammy was a huge part of this offense. I'm not trying to draw conclusions but it make no sense.

Some of you guys take this board to serious. Grammar police, irritated by threads that don't meet your standards, and constantly bashing people whose opinions differ from yours. This board must be some of your lives. I'll continue to post and if you don't like it don't respond. It won't hurt my feelings. There are plenty of threads I feel just don't warrant a response. Nothing on this board will irritate me enough that I have to rant and let some stranger know that they had a huge affect on my day. Lol. Oh and I forgot the thread counters. Lol

Not quite. I'm not from Buffalo. I don't get all of the news. Two Bills drive and Bills daily is all I'm familiar with.

You seem to have some sort of obsession with my threads why is that? I asked about Jones progress because I thought I may have missed something. The last I heard he was slated as the #1 receiver. And to see that I thought he must of had some good days. Also if my threads bothers you, you do know you're not obligated to respond?? Just a thought.

I thought a recent depth chart that was posted had him as the #1 receiver. Before the trade I did believe he would be the #2. Now if he's not the #1 then who is?

Would love to know how he's progressing. I hear more about Rod Streeter then I do Jones. I'm also wondering if the Bills will go for a vet before the season start.

When the season starts and Tyrod is struggling through 3 to 4 games I'd pull him and insert Peterman. Here's my reasoning. To start Tyrod is a veteran and if you're 3 to 4 games down and there's no improvement on Tyrod's part then just accept the fact that he is what he is and that's below average for his experience. Now to Peterman. See what you have in him for the remainder of the season. He may be the future and he may not. At the worst he's a back up. However if he end up showing promise then it allows the Bills to use those draft picks on a wr, and some o-line help. Bottom line is those picks could be better used getting a quality vet at a position of need or draft a future star. At the end of the day knowing what you have in Peterman helps tremendously. There are still holes to fill.

Exaaactly. I'll get into the far less qb. To start the qb or qb's are considered lesser then Tyrod because of looking at numbers blindly, especially turnovers. They may throw more int's then Tyrod, but the most important thing is they're getting the ball out of their hands and giving receivers chances. And even throughout that they're receivers will still be more productive then Sammy and thats because Sammy is playing with a qb that wont throw the ball at all. But in some people eyes that make him slightly above average because he dont throw that many int's. Do that make a average receiver better then Sammy? Matthews is nowhere near Sammys level. Later for the numbers. Hes getting more opportunities then Sammy is. If it werent for some of the chances other qb's take that result in int's these guys would be light years ahead of Tyrod. Ask any receiver would they rather play with a qb thats not scared to allow them to make a play on the ball or would they rather play with a qb like Tyrod who dont turn the ball over because hes scared to take chances and has happy feet and will run at the first sight of a different jersey. Remember receivers are divas. Ill take a qb thats not scared to throw the ball over Tyrod any day

Huh??????

They will trade Tyrod Taylor if he starts playing like a franchise qb. That way they could easily sell him for draft picks. I guess the team with the most draft picks win or something. So if the Bills can get 20 picks in 7 round draft, theyre the best. Draft picks. Smh

Thaaaaaaaaaank you. The Steelers game was a prime example of how bad Tyrod is. If a receiver isnt WIDE OPEN Tyrod wont get them the ball bottom line. Not only that if Tyrod is really that good why was he forced to take a huge pay cut and years off of his deal? That dont happen to even good qb's. Tyrod hurt Sammys play bottom line. With this regime if they ever get a player of Bradys caliber they will most likely trade him away for draft picks.

They already had the ammo to get a qb with their first round picks. That was just Beane trying to make a invalid statement.

I believe he can be a good one. I hope for the Bills sake he do. The only problem is the moment he reach elite status some expert in the front office will sit around brainstorming how many picks they can turn him into. So Ill just continue to support my team and try to control my emotions and expectations. Ill just realize and recognize why we havent been to the playoffs in 17yrs and counting. We will build a great team eventually and then we will bring in a head coach that will want to change a successful scheme to something that dont fit the current roster. Then the front office will start getting him some of his players. Then he will get fired and they will bring in a coach to bring the old scheme back and by then its to late because you now need more players that will fit this current coach scheme. Sound familiar?

I thought thats what you are supposed to do retain top talent. I guess the new way is get rid of definite talent and gamble on picks that are basically possibles? Forgot to mention top young talent. And they dont fit into the new regimes plans? They obviously dont have plans

✌✌✌

Cool. Do you know me or ever met me to feel im an idiot? Also i would never trade insults over a message board. But if that floats your boat continue to feel great.

So you insult me because my opinion differ from yours? I thought thats what this board is about, epxressing your opinions and debating about the Buffalo Bills. However its cool. You have a blessed day.

And the other teams thats done it do it strategically ala the Patriots. They allow talent to walk because theyre getting prepared to address a different issue, The Bills let players walk because egos, scheme fit, or always determining this player isnt worh it or that player isnt worth it. Nothing strategic at all. Buffalo is starting to be the place where you finish out your rookie contract and you get out asap.

So it havent been 17yrs? We didnt have talent here that we just let walk away?