transplantbillsfan

Bought the Kirkland 22 year old Sherry Cask Single Malt because it was $80 (same price as Oban) and I've never tried Scotch that old. It's very good, but I think I like Oban better.

Josh Allen. It will help when his WRs and TEs actually catch the damn ball this year.

First of all, you're falling prey to the Meteorologist fallacy. It's a common problem over here, don't worry. If you flunk a math exam in your sophomore year of High School but otherwise get As throughout the rest of your academic career in that subject, are you viewed as an F student in math? The obvious answer is no, and you know that. Second of all, I don't know why I responded to someone who actually thought it was USA Today and NPR that conducts major nationwide polls. Try clicking the link and reading for a change.

He was already pretty close to it, wasn't he? So we're talking Julio Jones at his peak? That level? Sure, it's possible.

I thought I was going to click on the thread and see a picture of his hot girlfriend. You've disappointed me.

Clever. Hilarious. I love it

And since suddenly polls matter again for @Deranged Rhino

I understand that 3 is triple. You also reacted with confusion to the post. 4 = quadruple At least get justifiably offended If you're so sensitive, ignore me. Generally I stay away but come back in spurts because @Deranged Rhino is obsessed with me. When I jump in, I generally only respond to what he's directed at me unless someone else jumps in.

A rapist who's lifetime is filled with corruption. I'm sorry for the quadruple confusion. I only just found this picture of most of the members here at PPP Don't worry, I think November will force your heads out of that sand

So Republicans are looking to give Democrats the House, the Presidency AND the Senate?

Dude you're really just making things worse for yourself. I'm not the kinda guy who holds a grudge or anything, but this effort of yours to celebrate something that hasn't and won't happen is a little ridiculous and will definitely make it so I have to poke and prod you for quite a while before choosing your new avatar. Did you get hit on the head a lot as a kid? Your logic of condemning polls when they aren't in your favor while promoting them when they are isn't just hypocrisy, it's idiocy. I never previously thought you were an idiot or moron by nature, but I was clearly mistaken. So we're using polls now? Polls are indicators of November? Problem is you point to a single poll that you and your cohorts here bow to and will inevitably defend because "he got it right in 2016 and everyone else got it wrong!" It's that kind of logic that makes you hopeless. It's just bad logic, plain and simple. As far as November goes, no, polls certainly don't favor Trump. The response to that statement from you or one of the other members of Trump Tribe is pretty predictable, but also failed logic. You're clearly the type who is too arrogant to admit being utterly wrong about anything and admit defeat, but I look forward to November so that you can at last realize--even though you lack the humility to do it publicly--that 2016 was an outlier, not the norm. As for how Biden is doing in terms of polling against Trump? Pretty consistent: November will be sweet when some humility is forced upon you since it's clearly not in your nature.

Cut Copy Paste So predictable oldtimer. Find a new schtick.

Infinitely more facts Oh wow, thanks for that. I needed a good laugh. As desperately as you want Trump and Biden to suddenly be on equal ground in terms of character, they aren't. A cockroach has more character than Donald Trump. There's a reason Biden has consistently been ahead of Trump in the polls, including state polls in battleground states like Wisconsin and Pennsylvania. This conversation will go on and that's fine. As of that laugher you just gave, I'm done with this. I'll let the Trump Tribe be for the 5 1/2 months you have left til bizarro world here comes crashing down.

You guys are silly. Take yourselves out of the damn political arena for a moment and get back to me when you can look at the FACTS (not opinions reached by writers in opinion pieces but reporting of events and interviews, etc) of this entire situation with even modest objectivity rather than conflating one allegation with another because you hold a political grudge. When you can legitimately do that, get back to me and tell me the Reade allegation isn't full of holes. That, of course, was a rhetorical question. As much as you guys profess objectivity, you still harbor serious political grudges, so I'm making an impossible request.

It's interesting to you merely because you believe, weirdly, that every sexual assault allegation is the same and should be given the same amount of credibility. I don't find conflating separate sexual misconduct/abuse allegations into one lump conclusion useful. The Kavenaugh situation is completely irrelevant to the Biden situation because they are separate allegations by different women of different men. All you guys desperately want to do is distract from the multiple issues with the Biden accusation by pointing to the unjustifiably accused Kavenaugh, and that's wildly problematic. You read the Vox article. I'm glad some of you actually read things that are posted. It's not purely an opinion piece though. I don't particularly care about the opinions of the writer. I was looking at the inconsistencies of events and stories within the piece itself. Her opinions are pretty irrelevant. But that wasn't the only article I posted. That you are 85% sure Biden did it just tells me more about your own tribalism than it does anything else. That you are that confident that Biden committed that heinous act after truly examining the situation objectively just demonstrates your own partisanship and hypocrisy, especially considering you've recently told me that you concluded that Donald Trump is completely innocent of all the 2+ dozen sexual assault/misconduct allegations that have been leveled against him. But I can't say I'm surprised. It's what seems to consistently happen over here with you guys and why I generally steer clear of this toxic environment.

What does one allegation have to do with the other? You guys over here are desperately trying to conflate the 2 just so you can ignore the serious holes that exist in Reade's story and personal history. It's predictable and also pathetic. Try to do some independent thinking.

Where am I being hypocritical with this? What in my posting history suggests I've been some hardcore #metoo activist? Please direct me to whichever post you're referring to. Please direct me to the spot where I said Kavanaugh undeniably did it, otherwise, shut the hell up.

God dude you're just out for fights. When you say "there's nothing to question," are you saying that he undeniably did it? That seems to be your implication, which would be ridiculous and I don't think you're THAT ridiculous... so I just hope you can clarify that.

Except one guy's had more than 2 dozen accusations of sexual assault/ misconduct and has been sued for it and settled those lawsuits for undisclosed amounts of money. He's also had a history of sleeping around and being unfaithful. He's also made statements caught on tape claiming he can grab women by the ***** and get away with it without asking. The other guy has one sexual assault allegation that's been changing since she initially came public (both from her AND one of her corroborating witnesses) and as time rolls on has more holes in it than Swiss Cheese. I'll say it again, if Biden did this, it's despicable. I just question if you guys are bothering to actually consider the facts of the case and consider that he didn't do it. He states it directly. One must be literate and read in order to find it, though.

PS: This comment came out pretty conveniently on a day where a couple stories broke, but also days after another broke... but my guess is you just utterly dismissed the stories because of the source

#1: He's not Donald Trump #2: He's not Donald Trump Those truly are my answers both as a person AND from a policy perspective

Evidently from not watching Cheers I just didn't get the entire joke and the whole "protecting the innocent" connection with the "bending some truths..." I apologize.

I got that it was a joke, but seemed like you were accusing me of lying. Considering you literally said I was "bending a few truths," don't you think that was a pretty fair assumption on my part?