Jump to content

Commsvet11

Community Member
  • Posts

    500
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Commsvet11

  1. 3 hours ago, Doc said:

     

    It wasn't a conviction because it was civil court.  And it wasn't rape: he was found liable for sexual abuse.  And to your original question, yeah, it bothers me that someone was found liable for something when there was zero proof he did it.  Again if all it takes is an allegation and that's how you want to play it, then Joke raped, or at least sexually abused, Tara Reade.


    @John from Riverside is this an example of you going after a right wing extremist or is it an example of one making you look stupid?

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

    Understand that because I don’t go after you like I do the rest of the right wing extremist idiots on this board. It’s out of respect. For your service.
     

    And that is the only reason
     

     


    Well then drop that reason, I can handle my own and you don’t go after the rest, those posters make you look pretty silly on a regular basis.

  3. 3 minutes ago, US Egg said:

    Speaking of saying things:

     

    Biden reps expressed condolences to the “folks” who died serving his administration.


    Guess they consider anyone who served being referred to as “folks” is showing reverence.

     

    That’s their idea of respect.


    See both bull#### time and Johnny want to call me an ####### but neither of them are willing to do that because if they did that I could turn that around  and tell them that according to their logic they have called all combat vets #######s even though it was meant toward a singular person regardless of service. They would have to concede a person can insult a person without including a group which is problematic to their position trump disrespected and insulted all POWs instead of a POW he didn’t like.

     

    Now Johnny boy could go the route of how I should respect the service but then I could clap back on How Trump was the Commander In Chief and Johnny doesn’t respect him at all and that’s another example of his hypocrisy.


    All you have to is bring up the actions and there is no response but their feelings it’s too easy. 

     

     

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  4. Just now, Tiberius said:

    I believe Kelly, and Trump did not visit the cemetery

     

    He disrespected gold star families, he said it and meant it  


    You want to believe Kelly, because it lines up with your opinion of Trump, for me, I’m a combat vet I hear words  that’s supposed praise military like “thank you for your service “. I look at actions like not getting the US in another conflict so there are less Gold Star Families, or trying to Improve the VA, because words like  thank you for your service doesn’t heal a broken bodies or PTSD.

     

     

    • Like (+1) 1
  5. 5 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

    I didn’t change the quote. I added another quote that Trump said to show that he can say these kinds of things and has no problem doing it

     

    Every time you chime in you just say something not very bright


    Let me check the title of thread…. Let’s go back to your posts…..you without proof claimed Trump said the quote, when presented with contrary reports by other posters you were found out and tried to weasel out of it by saying oh because Trump said this about a guy he didn’t like that means he has the ability to say something like that to the entire military.

     

    Well Johnny that dog don’t hunt.

    Now I understand how you might not understand and think I’m not being bright but I will happily spoon feed you .

     

    You are on here barking on how everyone needs proof of this and that and it’s well documented. So for you turn around and say well I don’t have exact proof Trump said that but it makes sense logically because he said this quote to insult to a singular person so obviously that’s proof enough for me that  he said this to entire group of people.

     

    A.)You are using logic wrong 

    B.) You are a hypocrite, you demand proof but when the tables are turned then all of a sudden it’s okay to infer.

  6. 1 minute ago, John from Riverside said:

    You’re misinterpreting what I’m saying
     

    I am actually for  having a lockdown setting whenever it comes to schools and protected by armed security

     

    You just can’t do that with every aspect of life


    Then why make the comment where OP didn’t think his point through? His point was because these places are known to be heavily armed it’s never a target for mass shootings and you went and said well because the bad guys don’t have guns and you got owned like you usual.

    • Agree 1
  7. 19 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:

    That’s because the bad guys don’t have the guns at a police station or prison you really didn’t think this through did you


    Well John go ahead and prove your point further by going to your  local police station or prison with a gun on you.

     

    Didn’t think that one through did you?

     

     

     

    As usual you have be to spoon fed concepts. And by the way the bad guys don’t  have  guns in a controlled building that’s filled with personal that are armed still make weapons to harm others.

     

  8. 15 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    You’d b surprised what good buzzwords of genes and a fat wallet will buy. Btw I’m a 6-8 based on previous comments 


    I wouldn’t know, never needed a fat wallet for sex and never needed to brag about having an average man’s  dick size but now I’m starting to see why you need to pay off women or maybe men for sex 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Disagree 1
  9. 1 minute ago, JDHillFan said:

    I wonder which of the board’s left-leaning members, so horrified by the repellent words of the Orange Nightmare, will be the first to speak out against Redhawk’s behavior here. Surely one of them has enough integrity to do so. 🙄


    I’m going to guess and say just a couple.

     

    Look at it this way if we all were in a public place like a bar or something and what’s said in this board was said out loud there would be some looks.

     

    1.) Everyone pays for sex one way or another

    2.) Drag queens reading to children is harmless 

    3.) If the subject of abortion came up and one particular person got angry because “ten year olds can’t get abortions!”

     

     

     

    4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    ere not talking stormy daniels asshat.  average girl next door.  family must want my kids


    Don’t think many fathers want some sixty some year old going after their child bearing daughters.

    • Disagree 1
    • Agree 1
  10. 1 minute ago, Commsvet11 said:


    In other words you pay for sex…….


    Oh my God, he just liked that comment LOL

    1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    everyone pays for sex.  being artificially nice is a cost.


    See you are the creepy old drunk that in disguise rationalizes that everyone pays for sex, and uses every dime but you know the back of your head the type of girl that would take your money and the drinks you buy will at a drop of hat go home to some guy and laugh about you.

    • Agree 1
    • Haha (+1) 1
  11. 14 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    some deep thoughts on how u rebs could win.  f18's, icbm's, tanks, warships against pitchforks.  the enemy will be concentrated in specific areas of red states.  places like dalton georgia or apparently the westside of buffalo could be easily obliterated....my house brigade would likely desire a live in doc, non?

     

     


    You keep thinking pitchforks, when it wouldn’t be that way at all. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  12. 30 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    it wasn't easy but it happened.  I'd gladly house a battalion fighting for democracy.  you wouldn't now would you?  what would prompt the war before weapons were confiscated?  what would make it a justifiable war in your eyes and within the parameters of your religion.






    ?

    but vastly superior weaponry...


    Vastly superior weaponry? 
     

    All across the country, in every state in many counties there are national gaurd and reserve armories. These armories have vehicles and weapons, and again since it’s a civil war those sites would be the first occupied.

    • Like (+1) 1
  13. 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    it wasn't easy but it happened.  I'd gladly house a battalion fighting for democracy.  you wouldn't now would you?  what would prompt the war before weapons were confiscated?  what would make it a justifiable war in your eyes and within the parameters of your religion.






    ?


    We’ll see there is a good example you would think you would just house soldiers but the reality is your house would be taken from you. You good with that? You better be because that’s a leftist value And the battalion that takes over your house might not be on your side, that’s something you have to consider, and no I would not allow soldiers to take over my home and property.

     

    What would prompt a war? Probably weapon confiscation to begin with. Is there a war that is justified? Complex questions with many answers depending on the victor.

     

     

     

    8 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    it wasn't easy but it happened.  I'd gladly house a battalion fighting for democracy.  you wouldn't now would you?  what would prompt the war before weapons were confiscated?  what would make it a justifiable war in your eyes and within the parameters of your religion.






    ?

     

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Disagree 1
  14. 23 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    a slightly veiled threat.  So logistically what does a shooting civil war look like.  I'd assume guerrilla tactics would be MAGAs main play

     

    There was also discussion on whether a civil war might actually be beneficial in that it would rid our culture of many deplorables.  i believe Westside side i might well get what I want.  meaning civil war.  i believe Irv has mentioned the possibility as well.


    Well for starters the left would begin with civilian weapon confiscation to prevent those MAGA guerrilla tactics, the problem with that is as you can see cities with heavy gun control it doesn’t work and creates a two fold problem, there are criminals that would take advantage of that and and any on the ground soldiers would have an easy time occupying. Say goodbye to your 1M house that becomes some battalions HQ. While on the right there would a requirement for every household to have guns and ammunition, not so easy to occupy because if there was a formal right military you also have that civilian front.

    You have another problem where while you support a civil war, you yourself don’t actually participate in one, see liberals rather have an authority fight for them,if a civil war comes you will lose some of your military and police, and I doubt the left would be able to recruit effectively leaving the left with a weaker easily more demoralized military.

     

    You remind me of someone back in the 1860’s thinking it would be easy to crush them Rebs and would think it take a very short time where civilians would actually have picnics near battles until a shattering reality takes place. 


     

     

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...