Commsvet11
-
Posts
500 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Commsvet11
-
-
24 minutes ago, Trump_is_Mentally_fit said:
They were big Trump supporters, so hard core. What's the issue?
I don't get the link between the kid being gay and the shooting. Wasn't Kirk really cool with gays? That's what I been hearing
Sorry, but 200 yards seems pretty far. Looking at a person two football fields away and they seem pretty small.
If you can hit someone at 500 yards, then I suspect that if there are copy cats of this they will have a decent chance of getting away. I have not seen any info on the tracing of the rifle, but the cops seemed stumped before his family turned him in. Could the gun of been traced by checking the round and matching it to some records?
According to the political side you support YOU are being very transphobic and spewing hate speech by saying the kid is gay.Your side says trans woman are women therefore the shooter can’t be gay and if you disagree your a bigot.
Your sides rules.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Max Fischer said:
Doing my part to call out the hate and lies.
Such a contribution, what twenty people on a buffalo bills message board politics sub forum?
That’s the best you could muster? Seems lazy.
-
6 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
It would prove its political, that why you're avoiding it
Sure, one of the sayings is For democracy! Do people commonly describe bugs, robots and aliens as fascists?
You don't fight people.
Is the movie independence day political?
Good info, thank you -
2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
Yes the code is from helldivers not the fascist part.
I play it, do you.
Any you conviently avoid my other question.
You kill robots and bugs and aliens in that game.
Lmao
I’m not a gamer but the description says a plot line is to spread managed democracy, would this game have political tones to it? -
39 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
Hey assh*le - take a look at this:
I gotta ……say it’s impressive you don’t even need to make argument you just quote them arguing with themselves. Very well done -
3 minutes ago, JDHillFan said:
Is this some sort of 4D chess question? If not, it’s truly dimwitted.
It has to be rationalized otherwise there would a level of discomfort in their own political party.1 minute ago, Figster said:Let me rephrase: Does a man deserve an allegiance with any political party when he kills to make a point?
Or does this sound more like dictatorship?
There is no place for killing in politics. You get that right?
What was the point the shooter was making in your mind? -
Just now, Figster said:
Wanting notoriety is not political motivation.
Then explain to me why it was only Charlie Kirk. A POLITICAL ACTIVIST that was murdered and not another person and not even another shot takenAgain if the guy just wanted be famous it would have been a MASS shooting with a much higher body coun
-
1
-
-
Just now, Figster said:
Kirk suspect FAR from central casting model of far left activist
Politically motivated? No
Deranged killer? Yes
How can you say it’s not politically motivated when the only person who was targeted and murdered with scoped rifle was a political activist?If this guy a deranged killer, then there would have been no specific target and a higher body count quite positive using a weapon that inflicts the most damage to crowds
The crowd had a mix of both political parties no shots taken on the crowd, just one.
-
1
-
1
-
-
22 minutes ago, Thurmal34 said:
That’s how YOU took it. Don’t blame me for his bigotry.
He literally said that black people in influential positions were stealing from white people. His words.
Just because he was killed does not mean we should gloss over his bigotry.
Like why are we canonizing this college dropout podcaster that spewed hate? I don’t get it?
I will look forward to your link with that exact quote. “His words” as you said But you and I both know it doesn’t exist. You will just link the DEI clip but that’s nowhere what you just claimed he “literally said”But it does make sense you have no idea who or what Charlie Kirk did.
You described him as college dropout podcaster.
Charlie Kirk isn’t famous for speaking in just a room with high profile guests prerecorded….. that’s more Joe Rogan, Charlie Kirk engaged and debated regular students at universities, see he didn’t lecture he debated that was his thing.
Now as a college dropout….. pretty sure that college dropout had a net worth more than you and I could ever attain. Maybe college was a scam.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, Thurmal34 said:
in your mind, calling out hate is “liberal”.
sorry.
you are equating hate speech to clothes.
get help.
Lemme guess - you think his attacks on people with different skin “makes him a good Christian”
No your post was he didn’t deserve to die but he kinda did because he deserved it because “hate speech”Same logic that goes what I said.
And you watch your mouth about skin color
-
20 minutes ago, Thurmal34 said:
No one is saying he should die - but when you spew hate you make enemies
No one was saying she deserves to get raped-but when you dress a certain way you attract creeps
I translated that to liberal logic to show how stupid you sound
-
1
-
-
As you can see Bull was just being a piece of garbage, Hey bull did you get some enjoyment trying to troll the right?
Is that what gives you joy in life?
Think about that.You had to post stupid ***** to what? Feel good? That’s what brings you joy?
Okay guy get your rocks off a man losing his life so you can “troll” the right.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:
I won't remember him at all, just as he wished.
I’ve seen this!Too bad it’s missing the actual quote.
Hey bull could you explain Kirk said about sympathy in this same conversation or did you just lift this off a Facebook?
-
17 minutes ago, ALLinALLEN said:
Also whoever this account is -is a nobody. It’s the same as the “libs of TikTok” or whatever the x account is. They cheer about anything that happens to dems too. Should I share those?
You could start with some of posters on this very thread. Haven’t seen you tell those posters their posts are messed up why is that?-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Tenhigh said:
I don't think I've ever been more in agreement with something you posted. We ALL need to remember it, let's all try to be better to each other.
I like your view, however this idea was shared on here the day Trump was shot in butler and months later…..
Same type of comments, same type of hyperbole.
This time a man did lose his life and people on this very board have justified It.
The liberals on this board wouldn’t try to kill me because of my politics themselves but they would applaud it if it happened and if able to vote for an authority.
There is no reasoning with that belief1 hour ago, Tenhigh said:Come on bro, there must be some Republicans who dont reflect your values...
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, reddogblitz said:
The bar to get military funeral honors is pretty low. Really all you gotta do is get an honorable discharge. But there are a few things that disqualify you.
https://www.militaryonesource.mil/military-funeral-honors/info-for-families/eligibility/
So by the 2 bolded, the 2nd one says she could lawfully be denied honors. But there's a new sheriff in town.
As a veteran I'm somewhat torn. What she was doing was wrong and probably illegal (not a lawyer). Probably not a federal capital crime (again not a lawyer). At the same time she did honorably serve in the Air Force.
The response was more Roundy saying she broke her sworn oath that’s what makes her a traitor and deserved to die to go hell because of thatmy point was there wasn’t any applicable oath it was already fulfilled.
-
On 8/26/2025 at 1:10 PM, Roundybout said:
She betrayed the oath she took to her country by attempting to overthrow the
Yeah…….that oath you keep going on about …….that expires per contract, that’s why when re-enlisting you have to repeat the oath and when you get that DD-214 you become a civilian…… no longer bound -
33 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:
They said they regretted the transition.
No one “bullied” decides you know what, let me shoot at some children.
It’s people like Roundy that feeds into the mental illness. See people like Roundy love to proclaim Trans women are women but when a simple request of him sharing a picture of a trans he would be willing to sleep nothing materializes…….as expected.Now this is important because the lip service is there but action is not and we all know why Roundy won’t do it.
Because Roundy doesn’t want to be seen as a homosexual because he knows trans woman are men and he doesn’t really believe trans women are women it just sounds progressive.
Now start this small idea and extrapolate many people say they believe trans women are women but when push comes to shove only the smallest percentage actually do believe that that has to be a hard reality of the already mentally mind.
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, Roundybout said:
Trans women are women. You’ll figure it out eventually.
If Trans women are women then why don’t you go ahead and show us all a picture of a trans woman you would be willing to have sex with.In fact let’s make a wager.
I will say trans woman are women if you post said picture as your avatar for one month.
-
47 minutes ago, daz28 said:
Do you have a link for that information? He specifically said "vote counting computers". and nothing about ISP to rural areas for voting. I don't even think you can vote from your CPU in Pennsylvania.
That is a good point……Let’s look at it again“It’s pretty amazing, but he did that, and then he journeyed to Pennsylvania, where he spent, like, a month and a half campaigning for me in Pennsylvania. And he’s a popular guy, and he was very effective,” Trump said at one point.
“And he knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers, those vote counting computers, and we ended up winning Pennsylvania, like in a landslide so it was pretty good. It’s pretty good. So thank you to Elon,” he added.
To your understanding that’s Trump saying he used Elon Musk Starlink to manipulate the results ……..of course that’s nonsense as shown in the link above. Now at first I thought Trump must have meant The Starlink providing ISP because I read the conspiracy theory of Starlink but you made the point there shouldn’t be any internet connect which is correct, and it certainly doesn’t make sense in the quote……
So what the hell is Trump talking about ?
In the quote Trump praises Elon musk for his work in PA, so now I have to look up what Musk did in PA because I need context,
“Musk said sarcastically that it must be a coincidence that Dominion voting machines, which had been at the center of conspiracy theories in the 2020 election, were used in Philadelphia and Maricopa County, Arizona, located in two battleground states won by Democrat Joe Biden. In 2023, Fox News agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems $787 million to avoid a trial in a defamation lawsuit the voting machine company brought against the network for lies told about their company switching ballots.”
Because of that incident That whole quote makes so much more sense doesn’t it?
Trump acknowledged Musk and his work in PA and the “vote counting computers” are the Dominion Voting Machines that Elon referenced to.
Trump wasn’t insinuating he stole the election with Elon Musk help, he insinuated It was stolen from him back in 2020.
-
1
-
-
47 minutes ago, daz28 said:
I gave you his own quote word for word. The EXACT SAME quote that's in your link(and everywhere else on the internet). Are you disputing that's what he said???? Are you saying you thought I had PERSONALLY heard him say that, and was taking credit for the story??? LOLOL Wth are you trying to say?
Yes because now that I read the story I know exactly what Trump was talking about, Elon Musk and the role Starlink played which provided an ISP to rural area voting, that’s the voting computers he is talking about, see you didn’t link the story, you did what liberals do best ignore contextual Information, now I found that information in the story and it seems you know as much as those idiot authors and trump knows about what starlink did that day.-
2
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, daz28 said:
LOL, I'm not going full circle on you saying I was wrong, when I told you the right wants me to disbelieve what I saw/heard, while you prove me right time and time again. Wait....I would like to know what he meant by that. Should I not be curious? If he says I was incoherently rambling, that will suffice. What do you think he meant, when talking about vote counting computers, and Elon knowing so much about them?
Not now bro, he's right at the "got me" point, because I would like to know what a questionable comment meant. Maybe it's lonely being an election denier, and he wants me to join him?
https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-voting-machines-trump-investigation-2018890
So much for what you saw and heard more like what you were told to hear or say, you couldn’t even be original
-
27 minutes ago, daz28 said:
LOL, I'm not going full circle on you saying I was wrong, when I told you the right wants me to disbelieve what I saw/heard, while you prove me right time and time again. Wait....I would like to know what he meant by that. Should I not be curious? If he says I was incoherently rambling, that will suffice. What do you think he meant, when talking about vote counting computers, and Elon knowing so much about them?
Not now bro, he's right at the "got me" point, because I would like to know what a questionable comment meant. Maybe it's lonely being an election denier, and he wants me to join him?
I got you.-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, daz28 said:
Not to the degree that it sounded like bragging about something nefarious. Are you saying I should just dismiss it for old age reasons?
Wait……you think Donald Trump had Elon musk commit voter fraud?
Should Don Jr. be cancelled?
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Now this is a good point, a liability issue, it’s disturbing to cheer a murder, I wouldn’t wouldn’t even say some of the things that have been posted on social media to a therapist if one doesn’t have the awareness to keep their disturbing thoughts to themselves what else can be expected ?
Best to severe ties.