Commsvet11
-
Posts
500 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Commsvet11
-
-
47 minutes ago, daz28 said:
I gave you his own quote word for word. The EXACT SAME quote that's in your link(and everywhere else on the internet). Are you disputing that's what he said???? Are you saying you thought I had PERSONALLY heard him say that, and was taking credit for the story??? LOLOL Wth are you trying to say?
Yes because now that I read the story I know exactly what Trump was talking about, Elon Musk and the role Starlink played which provided an ISP to rural area voting, that’s the voting computers he is talking about, see you didn’t link the story, you did what liberals do best ignore contextual Information, now I found that information in the story and it seems you know as much as those idiot authors and trump knows about what starlink did that day.-
2
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, daz28 said:
LOL, I'm not going full circle on you saying I was wrong, when I told you the right wants me to disbelieve what I saw/heard, while you prove me right time and time again. Wait....I would like to know what he meant by that. Should I not be curious? If he says I was incoherently rambling, that will suffice. What do you think he meant, when talking about vote counting computers, and Elon knowing so much about them?
Not now bro, he's right at the "got me" point, because I would like to know what a questionable comment meant. Maybe it's lonely being an election denier, and he wants me to join him?
https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-voting-machines-trump-investigation-2018890
So much for what you saw and heard more like what you were told to hear or say, you couldn’t even be original
-
27 minutes ago, daz28 said:
LOL, I'm not going full circle on you saying I was wrong, when I told you the right wants me to disbelieve what I saw/heard, while you prove me right time and time again. Wait....I would like to know what he meant by that. Should I not be curious? If he says I was incoherently rambling, that will suffice. What do you think he meant, when talking about vote counting computers, and Elon knowing so much about them?
Not now bro, he's right at the "got me" point, because I would like to know what a questionable comment meant. Maybe it's lonely being an election denier, and he wants me to join him?
I got you.-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, daz28 said:
Not to the degree that it sounded like bragging about something nefarious. Are you saying I should just dismiss it for old age reasons?
Wait……you think Donald Trump had Elon musk commit voter fraud? -
Just now, daz28 said:
That's not what I'm saying. If what trump said about Elon and the vote counting computers was just incoherent rambling, then we ALL need to be very concerned, and you'd be making yourself a massive hypocrite in this very post if it was. I mean I'd hope it was just some old guy stringing random words together, but not really. The fact he hasn't been asked about it is crazy to me. I'd like it if trump would stop negotiating with Russia via tweet threats too.
Are you really suggesting Trump has never incoherently rambled on before? Really? -
9 minutes ago, daz28 said:
Wait, you're saying if Biden rambled that exact quote after winning in 2020, there would have been no "fake" outrage about that? I'm EXTREMELY curious as to what Elon had to do with the vote counting computers that trump was so thankful for. I appreciate you going full circle here, and proving my point, that I must not have heard EXACTLY what I heard. Thanks.
What you heard and already yourself acknowledged is Trump rambling and as you said has a history of doing. So he is doing what he has normally been doing for decades.That wasn’t the case for Biden his mannerisms were not the same from before. There was no fake outrage it was plain as day.
Unless you would like to say it was all fake outrage about Bidens mental capacity…..would you like to declare that?
-
30 minutes ago, daz28 said:
Obviously, I'm not going to change your bias. Get ready for a lot of trump gaffes, too. He's the oldest president ever elected, and already has a history of endless rambling. You seem to follow the right some, so maybe you can help me out with what trump was saying here, and was it a "gaffe":
“It’s pretty amazing, but he did that, and then he journeyed to Pennsylvania, where he spent, like, a month and a half campaigning for me in Pennsylvania. And he’s a popular guy, and he was very effective,” Trump said at one point.
“And he knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers, those vote counting computers, and we ended up winning Pennsylvania, like in a landslide so it was pretty good. It’s pretty good. So thank you to Elon,” he added.
Sounds like Donald Trump giving a compliment to a person in the 80s, 90s, 2000’s 2010’s and 2020’s.
As you said yourself, he has a history of rambling, the only people who are shocked by this revelation is ….no one which is why it’s so dishonest for the left to even try to be shocked.
See there is the difference it’s manufactured outrage.
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, daz28 said:
I agree, but the new outlets/social media have EVERYONE doing it. This is 100% not exclusive to any party, nor modern history. If you don't attack a political gaffe, then you ain't doing politics right. It's basically their job. How far would you have to look to find a Biden gaffe here? Sheesh. I'm sure sometimes I bite on them myself, but I ain't biting on this one. The fact that both parties are in full commie/nazi name-calling mode likely played a huge part in this gaffe being so big.
Let’s go to your point of a finding a Biden gaffe, there was a thread that was about how mentally unfit Biden was and to you that would be full of gaffes ……:.:until after the debate when the powers that be on the left said uh yeah he is unfit.Mostly the conservatives when they accuse there tends to be found truth while on the left well pretty much hyperbolic lies which makes the left look stupid.
-
5 minutes ago, daz28 said:
I correctly corrected both sides, and that's not my job anyways.
And that’s why I say liberals don’t believe in what they say they believe in, when liberals make ridiculous statements it’s never any liberals job to say “Hey that’s stupid let’s not do that” -
Just now, daz28 said:
It was a gaffe. We've all done it before. For me that's the end of the story.
Yeah for you……but you sure aren’t correcting anybody else on here who actually think it now are you?
-
2 minutes ago, daz28 said:
...and the right can't believe what they heard/saw. It was a gaffe simple as that. I'll bet within 30 seconds of leaving the stage he realized the left would call him a Nazi, and the right would claim they didn't see what they saw. It's just a stupid game at this point.
You know it was an awkward hand gesture and you call it a gaffe the problem lies with why would we even have the discussion and the reason is because people with the emotional intellect of a child having a fit because they didn’t get their way cried it.You don’t give credibility to that.
-
18 minutes ago, njbuff said:
They have no power any more and there is no reason to take them seriously.I just ignore the left, as what they say doesn’t mean Jack to me.
The left doesn’t even believe in what they say they believe in.-
1
-
2
-
-
18 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
Well, here's one that I think was a bad law, sold on an apparently false premise. And guess what? You'll probably agree about this one with respect to the first name.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Shepard_and_James_Byrd_Jr._Hate_Crimes_Prevention_Act
I will counter with a good law. Megan’s Law. -
36 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
I follow the general rule that all legislation named after a person is almost always bad.
That’s a bold statement, I wouldn’t say that in public -
Just now, The Frankish Reich said:
A. When you're joke is not funny.
B. When your audience is "special"
Eye of the beholder
Ah you are that type of condensing prick that says something you truly believe and when it doesn’t land and makes you look like condensing prick you are quick to go “it was just a joke guys”And here is the best part everyone else is stupid for not getting your “joke”
-
1
-
-
12 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
Something makes me think T Master still changes his own oil
Ladies and gentlemen…..the liberal burn!
But good news! you are proof a man can be woman -
22 minutes ago, B-Man said:
.
So this lady isn’t encouraging people to go to LA for an abortion because they might lose their life/soul in a fiery place over an abortion?
Think I heard that somewhere
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
Yes we hate brown people. He hates American citizens apparently, and cops.
No his fantasyland is where authorities of government can do no wrong and illegal aliens just want to live a peaceful life in America and something to the contrary happens and shatters those beliefs the poor guy has to cope.Want to really make him squirm? Say cops don’t do much in critical situations so that’s why you have a gun and watch him judge you for owning a gun
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said:
Maybe the illegal shouldn't have started her on fire is the correct answer. Nice try though.
I dont understand why roundy is upset the cop didn’t do anything, maybe roundy wanted him to do something to help the lady because roundy does in fact hate brown people…… -
34 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
You don’t love our republic? Not a perfect government but what is?
God all mighty
I have proven I would die for my country, the idea of what it represents not some politician policy-
1
-
-
There are people who love their country and then there are those that love their government.
-
1
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, 4th&long said:
You guys should boycott ASAP the bills message boards because of this. Don’t stand for it damit! Leave forever!
Remember when you went on to another bills message board and instead of banning you they just gave you your own thread and every post you made they mods just put it there? Good times!-
1
-
-
32 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:
"I have never had a drinking problem or have never abused women, but just in case I did I assure you I am now a changed man."
So what's the age cut-off for "youthful indiscretion?"
Gaetz and Hegseth in their mid-30s? RFK Jr. in his 50s? Trump in his 60s?
I agree with you about drinking and military culture, but if you're an officer with career ambitions, you learn how to control yourself.
I noticed you left out the president that got BJ from a twenty some in the Oval Office but we all know why you did that. Either way it’s a point anybody can still womanize at any age but my point was in the military its quite frequent particularly when your are in your early twenties.Now to your last quip if you are an officer with career ambitions you learn to control yourself
If you are an officer with career ambitions, I’m sorry but you are not a good officer your career will take place over leading your men.
I really need you to think about that…… do you want a leader of men or an officer with career ambitions.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, B-Man said:
Hegseth On Track?
By John Hinderaker
The Democrats have mounted a smear campaign against Pete Hegseth. With Matt Gaetz gone, he appears to be their number one target.
The smears have involved Hegseth’s relationships with women and allegations of excessive drinking. But there are problems with the Democrats’ campaign: the allegations are anonymous, and thus in the realm of rumor. And they are nearly all old, and generally contradicted by others who are willing to go on the record.
If the question is whether Hegseth has a checkered history with women, the answer is yes. But there is no solid evidence of anything beyond that, and I don’t think anyone seriously believes that what is in the public domain should disqualify Pete from serving in the cabinet.
I don’t think there are four Republican senators willing to buck Trump on an important nomination. Senators like Joni Ernst have expressed caution, but I can’t see her–or any other Republicans other than Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins–actually voting Hegseth down. So I am optimistic that he will be confirmed.
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2024/12/hegseth-on-track.php
Outside every Army base there is always the following in close proximity…….a pawn shop, a strip club, a tattoo shop, a car dealership and a liquor store though the commissary is cheaper for alchohol.
What does every American Legion and VFW have? That’s right a bar.
What tradition is done every year for the Marines founding date?
You know what goes on during a military ball?
It’s just so comical what’s next college kids drinking and partying and hold on guys there could be sex happening there too.
Everyone is young and stupid once and then you grow up or you become a liberal.
-
1
-
All Things NAZI!!
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
That is a good point……Let’s look at it again
“It’s pretty amazing, but he did that, and then he journeyed to Pennsylvania, where he spent, like, a month and a half campaigning for me in Pennsylvania. And he’s a popular guy, and he was very effective,” Trump said at one point.
“And he knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers, those vote counting computers, and we ended up winning Pennsylvania, like in a landslide so it was pretty good. It’s pretty good. So thank you to Elon,” he added.
To your understanding that’s Trump saying he used Elon Musk Starlink to manipulate the results ……..
https://www.factcheck.org/2024/11/musks-starlink-was-not-connected-to-vote-tabulation-contrary-to-online-claims/
of course that’s nonsense as shown in the link above. Now at first I thought Trump must have meant The Starlink providing ISP because I read the conspiracy theory of Starlink but you made the point there shouldn’t be any internet connect which is correct, and it certainly doesn’t make sense in the quote……
So what the hell is Trump talking about ?
In the quote Trump praises Elon musk for his work in PA, so now I have to look up what Musk did in PA because I need context,
https://www.spotlightpa.org/news/2024/10/elon-musk-donald-trump-pennsylvania-election-2024-philadelphia-suburb-
“Musk said sarcastically that it must be a coincidence that Dominion voting machines, which had been at the center of conspiracy theories in the 2020 election, were used in Philadelphia and Maricopa County, Arizona, located in two battleground states won by Democrat Joe Biden. In 2023, Fox News agreed to pay Dominion Voting Systems $787 million to avoid a trial in a defamation lawsuit the voting machine company brought against the network for lies told about their company switching ballots.”
Because of that incident That whole quote makes so much more sense doesn’t it?
Trump acknowledged Musk and his work in PA and the “vote counting computers” are the Dominion Voting Machines that Elon referenced to.
Trump wasn’t insinuating he stole the election with Elon Musk help, he insinuated It was stolen from him back in 2020.