Jump to content

Commsvet11

Community Member
  • Posts

    500
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Commsvet11

  1. 17 hours ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    Haiti is a political and humanitarian disaster. No country in the Western Hemisphere even comes close.

    Trumpistas, if it is your policy that these people should be left there (or sent back) to starve and be killed by gang militias, well, then just come right out and say so. Because that is exactly what will happen. Otherwise, please talk about something rational, like what do you propose we do? Don't say send them back to make their country better; it hasn't happened for half a century or more (maybe way more), and it's not going to happen in the forseeable future. You are saying they should be sent back to starve or be killed. Period. Own it.

     

    Okay, so long as YOU own what happens in these little Haiti communities here in America.

  2. 7 minutes ago, SectionC3 said:

    Get out your late-1700s dictionary and get to work.  If you’re going to play the literalist game then you better have an explanation for how the drafters could have meant to protect something that did not at that time exist.  That’s the flaw with originalism and literalism.  And, far as “can’t be infringed goes,” I’ll remind you that probably the most conservative justice of his time wrote heller.  He disagrees with you.  Why? Likely because there’s a difference between a reasonable restriction and an infringement. 

    He doesn’t know what the point is,  either.  Kind of like that K D guy here.  They just make it up as they go along. 

    So now you’re saying that a musket isn’t an arm? Totally out of your depth once again. 


    The second amendment was carefully written with weapon technology advancements in mind, that’s why it written the right to bear arms (armament) otherwise it would read  The right to bear muskets

    • Haha (+1) 2
    • Awesome! (+1) 1
  3. 3 hours ago, sherpa said:

     

    So you were in a restaurant is "North East PA, which is in the northwest of PA."

    Does what you post even make sense to you?

     

    Just to save time, regarding your accusation re Reagan deficits, do you remember how Congress used to work.

    You know, when we actually had a budget submitted and approved?

     

    If not, I'll remind you of Reagan's attempt to get a line item veto to handle what are now called "earmarks" which are nothing more than getting the taxpayer to pay for stupid expenditures that added to the budget.

    Remember any of that?


    Skunk and Goat? Or Freeport?

  4. 3 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said:

    Dude, there are many XX women I wouldn't sleep with.  So what?


    Would you sleep with a trans woman? It’s a simple question, sure there are ugly women but men do sleep with ugly women  go ahead and post a picture of a a trans woman you find attractive and would sleep with.

     

    If any of you believe trans women are women this should be no problem 

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  5. 43 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    Hey, Mikey Flynn's wingman, it looks like you rediscovered QAnon all by yourself!

    Continue living in your fantasy world.

    By the way, your description of you job duties confirms my guess: lab tech.

    Maybe Trump 47 will help to advance your career before you hit 70.

    Loser.

     Again a “Lab Tech” is known as a Medical Laboratory Scientist requires the following courses….. General Chemistry, Organic Chemistry, Biochemistry Quantitative Analaysis Chemistry, Clinical Laboratory Chemistry, Physics, General Biology, A&P I and II, Genetics, General and Clinical Microbiology, Hematology, Immunohematogy and you can’t get any lower than a C letter grade in any of those courses.

     

    Its not the burn you think it is. 

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  6. 1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

     

    Brings back memories..

     

    I used to do countless reticulocyte slide stains for my research...can't recall what the stain was.  Also  hematocrits with capillary tubes and that ruler device thingy. 

     

    Ancient times. I imagine there are more modern techniques for both these days.


    New Methlyne Blue using those Copeland jars for manual stains but luckily that’s done by flow cytometry, manual spun HCT is actually still done in my lab as a confirmatory test or when there is an interferce that requires a recalculation of the indices.

    I’m lucky enough to start off in a lab that did mostly manually methods that helps the baseline understanding of the automated methodology 

    • Like (+1) 3
  7. 4 minutes ago, Tommy Callahan said:

    Techs would still do the work, like blood draws and what not.   AI would analyze and order test.

     

     

     

     


    I am a Medical Laboratory Scientist, blood gets drawn we run it through the instruments and there is even an instrument that categorizes the WBC and red cell morphology but the instrument such as a cella vision gets confused particularly when it comes to immature WBC in peripheral blood.

     

    Sometimes it confuses a monocyte with a blast or it can’t tell what a WBC is.

     

    Its my job to review and release proper results in the case there is criteria that needs pathologist review such as a blast the Pathologist would confirm as that is beyond my scope for final results.

     

    AI can only assist, you will always need the human judgment there will be many missed or inaccurate results that could lead a misdiagnosis.

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Thank you (+1) 1
  8. 15 minutes ago, The Frankish Reich said:

    Young people do need to think: am I embarking on a career that can be automated? Performed by AI? By remote workers abroad?

    Building things, plumbing, making sandwiches, whatever - these will still be largely on-site jobs.

    On the other hand, some high paying jobs today like Radiologist? Pathologist? Jobs that will be overtaken by AI.

     Pathologist overtaken by AI? 

    • Like (+1) 1
  9. Just now, Scraps said:

    In the days since the shooting, we have learned that the shooter was a registered Republican, he was into guns and was ostracized at school as a wierdo and a loser.  I haven't seen anthing showing that he was a consumer of rhetoric as extreme as what you claim Kathy Griffin did.  Things point more to him being a mentally disturbed person more along the lines of John Hinckley than a political assassin like John Wilkes Booth.  You might be right.  Nobody is denying that but you are forcing the situation to fit your preconceived notions without regard to the evidence that has surfaced to date and you show contempt for any countervailing opinion.


    1.) Whackjob was twenty years old, not like he has a track record of voting republican 

     

    2.) You haven’t seen he was a consumer of rhetoric as extreme as what I claim Kathy Griffin did?

     

    Well I think shooting Trump in the head qualifies him for being a participant of the consumption of the extreme rhetoric, let’s make no mistake I’m not claiming I’m stating as actual fact what Kathy Griffin did post that picture.

     

     

     

     

    49 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

    You forgot a few:

     

    Trump attempted a coup, Trump is a pathological liar, Trump calls on his political opponents to be locked up, Trump has called for terminating Constitution, Trump has said he will be a dictator, Trump lied about losing last election and more.

     

    He brings it on himself


    So you are saying he gets what he deserves?

     

    He deserves to be assassinated?

     

    Is that what your saying?

  10. 15 minutes ago, Scraps said:

    I think the other people are just saying you don't know the motivation of the sick loser killer.  

     

    John Hinckley tried to kill Ronald Reagan to impress Jodie Foster.  Would you have been guessing that as a motivation immediately after the shooting?


    Oh I would assume at first it was political and that’s an intelligent example no doubt about it. The difference I do see is there has been hyperbolic messaging regarding Trump for several years that no other President has faced. I mean it is rabid it’s Trump is hitler, Trump is a dictator, Trump leads a cult, Democracy is at an end if Donald Trump is elected, Kathy Griffin has a mock severed head of Trump so on.And when some psycho actually does something it just doesn’t seem logical that is could be anything but political because who wouldn’t want to take out Hilter. That’s why I say it was politically motivated.

  11. Just now, The Frankish Reich said:

    I love this debate where everyone is trying to get inside the mind of a sick loser killer.


    Well that human interest is rather popular these days particularly with serial killers but most of my arguing today has been this was a politically motivated assassination attempt while a couple  people think I’m a conspiracy theorist for thinking so.

    • Like (+1) 1
  12. 1 minute ago, 4th&long said:

    Just because he chose the site and target doesn’t mean it’s politically motivated.

     

     If Taylor swift comes to town and I want to go out in a blaze of glory and get my 15 minutes of fame, take a pot shot at her does that mean I hate pop music? Does it even mean I hate Taylor swift? No. She comes to an area I frequent and know well I got the advantage of where to hide, her body guard might have never been to the arena in town. I have seen every square inch at the local arena.


    You do realize that the distance between Bethel Park and Butler PA is a good hour right? 
     

    Let’s set that aside 

    Now notice in your warped fantasy for your 15 mins of fame you picked Taylor Swift. The most notorious and popular figure, because that’s going to get you more fame.

     

    Now a point of mine that you have demonstrated is this. If this isn’t politically motivated and you’re after just fame for your death a former president isn’t ideal, a current one is.

     

    or let me explain this how you or a teenager could understand it.

     

    Miley Cyrus is one hour away while Taylor Swift is three hours away. Same assumption level of security which one will make you more famous ? 
     

     

  13. 14 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

    23 and me or some such service. That’s why I don’t use them.

    And you just want it to be politically motivated so you can continue to lash out at the other side. It works both ways!


    It’s not what I want…… it’s what it is.

     

    It is a fact a disturbed whack job traveled to a political rally and targeted a politician.

     

    That wackjob CHOSE that site, he CHOSE the target, the whack job KNEW what he was doing  and WHO he was targeting.

     

     

    • Like (+1) 2
  14. 3 minutes ago, 4th&long said:

    Opportunity. Biden didn’t have an outdoor rally in the wide open country in his back yard.



    Why not wait for the right opportunity then? It’s not like there was a time restriction on making oneself famous.
    If it wasn’t political why not stay closer to home where the First Lady was? 

    That would have made a splash. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  15. 1 minute ago, BillsFanNC said:

     

    It's still pissed because the shooter missed.


    It does explain the difficulty coming to terms what happened, like the guy that makes comment that makes oneself look like a total piece of garbage and tries to claim it was a joke.

     

    I actually bet the poster thought there would be more support instead of being looked at a lunatic that needs watched.

  16. 1 minute ago, TH3 said:

    that tinfoil hat you are sporting is getting a little too tight


    I have a tinfoil hat because I don’t believe the shooter wasn’t politically motivated because he drove an hour to a political rally, for the most part ignored the mass amount of people at said rally and focused on the speaker of the rally who just happens to be a politician? 
     

    Is that right? That’s like saying Lee Harvey Oswald was a crazy mass shooter. You realize that’s how you sound right?

    • Like (+1) 1
×
×
  • Create New...