[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

8 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

Same script every time. 

 

in Blackhat they have instructions and ways to buy or build comment profiles. but last I knew it was only twiter, Disquord, and other big social media sites. maybe.

 

 

Actually I don’t believe this is trolling. That poster has been on here for sometime. That poster is the example for what a liberal is.

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

It's self evident 

 

So answering you would be stupid. 

 

Are there too many gun laws already? 

I love this!

 

Tibs: We need to Ban AR-15 to save lives 

Comms: How is banning AR15 going to save lives 

Tibs: They just will

Comms: Explain how 

Tibs: Well the answer is self evident so it’s stupid to answer

Fine. Pretend I’m stupid, explain it to me as you would a child. How would banning the AR15 save lives? 

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

4 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

It will though, you just don't care. 

 

You like these weapons because they make you feel intimidating? 

Explain how banning AR 15 will save lives. If you could you already would have. 

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Saving lives is not stupid. 
 

 

When you suggest something won’t save lives it is.

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

ummm, maybe because it's not a definition.  more like a manifesto.

 
See if you were smarter you would know there is a manifesto that already describes those things I mentioned, it was written by Karl Marx.

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

10 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

That’s why I love the idea of doing law suits against the makers of the weapons. Help in murdering children, then you get massive law suits against you 

 
Should we sue your mother and hold her accountable for your actions since she should have swallowed you?

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

what is the range of your AR?  Are you certain you never hit someone from your deck?

Is there an official MAGA dictionary?  Where can I get one?

And this is what makes you a load that should have been shot into a sock. You ask for a definition and get one with examples on this very board, and the go to is some MAGA something something something.

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

6 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Why? 

You want them banned but you need a reason, you said it would save lives but can’t explain how it would save lives. This is why I call you a load that should have been swallowed. You make stupid statements 

 

 

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

3 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

define commies.  be specific.  I defined MAGA's.  your turn.

A Commie is one who want removal of arms from its citizens. A commie is one that want children to be a ward of state not family.  A Commie supports the destabilization of the nuclear family.

A communist supports population control. A commie cheers on the persecution of a political opponent.

 

So far on this board I have seen the left leaning posters state, schools should control the children, Abortion should be legal up to birth, all guns should be banned and a misdemeanor that is past the statue of limitations becomes a felony is absolutely acceptable for an indictment.

 

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

Just now, Tiberius said:

You are a garbage person. 
 

Have you ever had a job? 

Don’t get mad at me for making you look stupid get mad at you.

Answer the basic question.

 

What lives will be saved by banning the AR-15? 
 

 

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

Just now, redtail hawk said:

nice image and insight into your thoughts...

Your a  load that should have should have been shot into a sock

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

Just now, Tiberius said:

To save lives 

Showing us everyday you are a load that should have been swallowed.

 

How would banning AR-15 save lives?

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

2 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

You're replying to a chain of replies about banning AR-15s WTF are you talking about?

 

How would the goal not be to remove them? I suppose technically you can write a law in such a way as to grandfather in previous ownership but when the previous comment is as vague as "ban them" I don't really get into that detail.

 

Also there are a lot of different ways to enforce a ban beside peoples paranoid posse of a roving federal band going around and taking peoples guns. They can use buy-back programs, they can institute fines, they can enforce it as they see it, and obviously they'd ask people to turn them in, but yes also they could take more extreme measures.

 

Why ban the AR 15? 

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

56 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Or just go ahead and ban them 

 

 

6 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

So there it is.  

 

using the state to disarm or take from legal citizens.

 

 

 

 

The ask where are the commies and then go to other threads and suggest commie favored policies….can’t make this up 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

1 minute ago, Roundybout said:

All our institutions are built on the reliance of people with specialized roles to fill those roles. I don’t want morons with room temperature IQ making decisions on the education of my child. 

Oh the irony 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

5 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Then do it at the school board meeting. Why should it be pulled after ONE parent comment?

 
Was the parents comment correct? It could be a bug in the system that will get sorted out 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

13 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Parents can have a say at school board meetings. 
 

They should not be able to delete parts of the curriculum just because it hurts their feelings, like this law allows.

I think it’s a good idea, it’s a check system where subject matter can be reviewed and if needed added to or discarded. Again the example of common core comes to mind 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

3 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

This is not a rebuttal. 

You tried to make a point on saying parents should have no say in their children’s education because they aren’t qualified by an institution. I am going to take a stab saying you aren’t a parent are you? 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

1 minute ago, Roundybout said:

Would you trust your barber to repair the timing belt on your car?

Are you stupid? 

20 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Hmm, would I rather have education designed by people with PhDs and masters degrees in child psychology, education, arts, etc. 

 

or 

 

Would I rather have education designed by Breighlynn, the high-school dropout mom of two with mild alcoholism and a belief that 5G towers cause autism? 

Common Core. That’s all that has to be said about that. 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

maybe you should buy a copy of the Kama Sutra.  There's a reason it has been popular for hundreds of years...

Some people don’t need a sex manual to do what comes naturally. 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

18 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

ask yourself why books on different lifestyle choices are such a threat to people like desantis and his followers.  My bet is that to many, it's a threat to what they define as their manhood.   I don't perceive that they threaten me or my lifestyle at all.  What do you think?  Oh and reproduction is enhanced by pleasure.  It's kinda the impetus or ideally it is.

What are you taking about? None of that has anything to do with sexual books being kids libraries.

 

And reproduction is enhanced by pleasure? If putting your penis inside a ***** doesn’t give you pleasure that means you size problem shorty

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

10 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

banning books is a slippery slope to banning more forms of artistic expression...oh, and more books.  and contraception. I'm glad u asked.  can we agree that reproduction is vital to the continued existence of a species?

So your solution to sexual books being school libraries is to leave them there in the libraries because if you remove them that is book banning and that will lead to banning more “artistic expression” which leads to bannning regular books and then pow banning contraception. 
 

Wow. Now you may need a book on how to reproduce but us regular humans have been reproducing without a manual for quite sometime.

 

 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

Just now, redtail hawk said:

It might soon become that.  Slippery slope.  Desantis wants in your bedroom...and they say Biden is weird.

Explain how keeping sexual books out school libraries is a slippery slope to banning books in a public library.

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

Just now, redtail hawk said:

I meant a public library.  but as I recall, it's entirely heterosexual.  We gave it once as a dirty Santa present exchange.  Given every year after by the next couple.  was a good running joke but also practical.

But that’s not what the controversy is about, it’s about books being taken out of school libraries.

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

35 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

 

can you still check out the Kama Sutra?  Cuz it's Indian and sexual but informative.  Does Desantis understand that procreation usually happens thru sex?

Why would you want the Karma Sutra in a school library?

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You saying that makes it ok for those Jan 6 animals to kill police? 

 

Wow! 

Nobody is falling for that, nice try