Commsvet11
-
Posts
496 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Commsvet11
-
-
3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:
And clubs and body armor and bear spray and shields and helmets and spears and battering rams and handguns.
How is that not being armed?
23 people charged with having deadly weapons that day
For all those weapons there is a surprising low fatality rate that day! maybe the body armor, shields and bear spray were defective and couldn’t kill as those items usually would. And a club and a spear I mean better put my gun down I am no match for that1 minute ago, Tiberius said:One of your mom's boyfriends say that one to you?
Your MAGA mom in Montana did
-
Just now, Tiberius said:
I've read enough of your trashy posts to conclude you are well below the average level of human intelligence
And You’re still a load that should have been swallowed. -
7 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Why did they have gun parts?Keep trying bro - it’s hilarious
So nobody #*%*#+ with them.They cooperate with the Capitol police, the police find it’s legal but the rest of the crowd aren’t none the wiser, it actually ruins your insurrection argument because you would have to cooperate with the police so you don’t get shot, kinda something you only do if you want to protest peacefully but are aware of unruly protestors.
-
Just now, Tiberius said:
They were armed, though
Apparently you can’t read either
-
1
-
-
45 minutes ago, BillStime said:
I didn’t lose anything - lmaoTRUMP lost and his people were ARMED.
Why would they have GUN parts? You can’t square this lmao
Again you aren’t intelligent to be asking critical thinking questions.From your Twitter link that you posted it doesn’t seem like those 3 people did a good job smuggling in those gun parts, so they could put the gun together later, I mean if you want an insurrection it seems like the better plan is to come armed with an already assembled rifle because guess what even though it was legal to posses gun parts, you just flagged yourself for suspicion and the chance of assembly of such weapon later drastically goes down.
So here is another thought. DC already has high crime and add in crowds that are protesters and counter protesters, we already seen what a mob can do, sometimes for one’s own safety you need a presence.
Even your not stupid enough to start something to someone who looks armed and guess what when the police question what you have which in your link did happen, you are in the clear.
-
5 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Why would they bring PARTS of a gun?You can’t prove that the other parts weren’t smuggled elsewhere with others.
You made the claim they were armed, you don’t have any proof they actually were and you cannot prove there were other parts on any other person to complete the set up.
You lost.
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, BillStime said:
But it does matter… they were going to pair them up with their corresponding parts later and you know it.
You can’t prove that and neither could the source YOU provided. -
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Why were they caught with parts of guns?Doesn’t matter why, it is legal to do so if you read what you posted. Which you didn’t. Why do people make the shape of a gun in their coats, to make people think they are armed when they aren’t but that’s neither here or there, in this case it was legal to do so.
But you, being a shining example of a liberal just read a headline and the bolded part and read what you wanted to read without any reading comprehension of the story.
You couldn’t wait to post that and when someone like me read literally a few lines down from what they wanted you to read it made you look stupid. Now it goes from “they were armed!!!!” To “well they COULD HAVE been armed.
-
1
-
-
31 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Do you think this is a gotcha ?They had PARTS of weapons - are you telling me the other parts couldn’t possibly have been carried by others elsewhere and then reassembled when they regrouped?
Freak
Don’t get mad because I point out your stupidity, you got busted. Calling me names won’t change that fact.-
1
-
-
15 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Unarmed?
Classic Billstime, someoneclaims protesters were unarmed so billstime shares a link on a Twitter account that says they were armed without reading the part that said they were actually …. thats right unarmed.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Unarmed?
HA! Read what you just posted, line 22 and 23.
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, Chef Jim said:
So you are part of his medical team that was aware of total mental abilities? I didn’t know that. Huh.Whether Hillary won is not the point. Just pointing out our possible hypocrisy. You probably said something derogatory about her being a carpetbagger but Oz being one is fine.
Now one more time. Other than “he’s not Fetterman” what qualities did you like about Oz?
Tell me more about Fetterman’s level of intelligence.
And now we’re choosing our representatives based on how they dress? Almost as bad as basing it on their gender and race.
We know Fetterman doesn’t have a medical degree, so there isn’t many translatable skills, whether or not you like it a medical degree does prove someone has a certain amount of intelligence. We know Fetterman didn’t like showing up to work as Lt. Gov and we know his town he was mayor of is one of the worst places in Pittsburgh during his tenure.We already seen how Fettermans stroke affected him, you don’t have to be a medical professional to know that, just like any intelligent person does when they see Joe Biden has dementia or do you think Joe is fine because I’m not on his medical team?
And basing a candidate on how they dress is not even close to gender and race discrimination…..are you Billstime Stupid?
Here is the thing Jim, we know you aren’t Billstime stupid, you see our points but want to be a devils advocate and we all see through that-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Chef Jim said:
Cute. He’s a carpet bagger for one. And backed by Trump for another. Now your turn. Why would he have been a good Senator?
Because there was a baseline of intelligence, that candidate at the very least passed medical school. I’ll take that any day over a guy that dressed like a slob that appealed to PA morons. -
11 hours ago, Chef Jim said:
When did those letters go out?
E-mails, sent on the 20th of this month to those who applied. -
1 minute ago, BillStime said:
Awe - precious - you got it! Apply that same logic to your desire to get an abortion… or your deep secret to get married to your buddy.
Everything will be okay sunshine.
Your secret is safe with everyone here and ATOP.
😘
😂 -
Just now, BillStime said:
Ask your daughter after she tells the BIg BAD government about her period.#winning
Well now see sweetheart, that’s the joy of it, they can participate or not in answering those questions. Had you read the article you wouldn’t need me to mansplain it to you.
-
Just now, BillStime said:
Oh tough guy - lol
How’s that snack coming sweetheart?10 minutes ago, Andy1 said:So the party who supports small government and doesn’t want government intrusion into the lives of citizens is OK with this?
What are you referencing?
-
1 minute ago, BillStime said:
Say that to your daughter or niece or neighnor - do it tough guy
Well if they act like the B word you are I will.-
1
-
-
36 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Look at you turn yourself into a pretzel trying to justify this highly inappropriate program.Do you think it’s anyones business?
Absolutely not.
If DeNazi asked you to jump over Niagara Falls you would lead the way.
I turned myself into a pretzel because I actually read and comprehended the article in your clickbait tweet?
Maybe the article hits too close to home, are you on the rag Billstime?
-
27 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Ask those girls.
Do you think this makes these girls feel real good talking about these highly private things?So unbelievably inappropriate.
Sick phucks.
Well if you actually read the article instead of just the tweet you would know it is voluntary…… meaning the teenagers don’t have to answer those questions. The article in fact is more of HIPAA concern. Now go make me a snack.-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, BillStime said:
Why DeNazi has NO chance in hell… this is sick AF. Nothing like sexualizing these kids, right @Brueggs? @BillsFanNC @Commsvet11?
The young vote will destroy him….
Why don’t you go ahead and explain how this is sexualizing children. -
6 hours ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
ok, forcing a mother to bear a child she doesn’t want is directly slavery and adds a mortality risk, are you sure this argument is a good path?I have bad news for you, biological functions aren’t considered slavery.
Our society literally takes wages from a paycheck and will imprison a person for not paying their child support. Which one sounds more like slavery?
-
34 minutes ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
No I feel that you are welcome to YOUR religious views.
why do you feel you’ve earned the right to impose your views on other people?
There has to be some type of morality in a society that is maintained by laws.We can base some laws we have to the Ten Commandments such as its wrong to steal and its wrong to murder, we have laws that say it’s against the law to steal and murder.
You have ignored my points where I have the opinion that abortion is as civilized as owning slaves the only difference is unborn infants instead of POC being considered less than human and needing advocated by a groups with a moral standard
-
1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
Simple- stop making your religious opinion a federal or statutory policy discussion.
don’t believe in it- don’t do it.
Don’t believe in it -don’t do it is the same saying as if you don’t want an abortion don’t get one, to which I say if you don’t believe in slaves don’t have any. But luckily there were those that would speak for those that were considered less than human
The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
Whose side had the riots about police brutality again?