[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

Just now, redtail hawk said:

nice image and insight into your thoughts...

Your a  load that should have should have been shot into a sock

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

Just now, Tiberius said:

To save lives 

Showing us everyday you are a load that should have been swallowed.

 

How would banning AR-15 save lives?

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

2 minutes ago, Warcodered said:

You're replying to a chain of replies about banning AR-15s WTF are you talking about?

 

How would the goal not be to remove them? I suppose technically you can write a law in such a way as to grandfather in previous ownership but when the previous comment is as vague as "ban them" I don't really get into that detail.

 

Also there are a lot of different ways to enforce a ban beside peoples paranoid posse of a roving federal band going around and taking peoples guns. They can use buy-back programs, they can institute fines, they can enforce it as they see it, and obviously they'd ask people to turn them in, but yes also they could take more extreme measures.

 

Why ban the AR 15? 

[What is better, no guns, or more guns?]

56 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

Or just go ahead and ban them 

 

 

6 minutes ago, Chris farley said:

So there it is.  

 

using the state to disarm or take from legal citizens.

 

 

 

 

The ask where are the commies and then go to other threads and suggest commie favored policies….can’t make this up 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

1 minute ago, Roundybout said:

All our institutions are built on the reliance of people with specialized roles to fill those roles. I don’t want morons with room temperature IQ making decisions on the education of my child. 

Oh the irony 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

5 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Then do it at the school board meeting. Why should it be pulled after ONE parent comment?

 
Was the parents comment correct? It could be a bug in the system that will get sorted out 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

13 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Parents can have a say at school board meetings. 
 

They should not be able to delete parts of the curriculum just because it hurts their feelings, like this law allows.

I think it’s a good idea, it’s a check system where subject matter can be reviewed and if needed added to or discarded. Again the example of common core comes to mind 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

3 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

This is not a rebuttal. 

You tried to make a point on saying parents should have no say in their children’s education because they aren’t qualified by an institution. I am going to take a stab saying you aren’t a parent are you? 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

1 minute ago, Roundybout said:

Would you trust your barber to repair the timing belt on your car?

Are you stupid? 

20 minutes ago, Roundybout said:

Hmm, would I rather have education designed by people with PhDs and masters degrees in child psychology, education, arts, etc. 

 

or 

 

Would I rather have education designed by Breighlynn, the high-school dropout mom of two with mild alcoholism and a belief that 5G towers cause autism? 

Common Core. That’s all that has to be said about that. 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

2 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

maybe you should buy a copy of the Kama Sutra.  There's a reason it has been popular for hundreds of years...

Some people don’t need a sex manual to do what comes naturally. 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

18 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

ask yourself why books on different lifestyle choices are such a threat to people like desantis and his followers.  My bet is that to many, it's a threat to what they define as their manhood.   I don't perceive that they threaten me or my lifestyle at all.  What do you think?  Oh and reproduction is enhanced by pleasure.  It's kinda the impetus or ideally it is.

What are you taking about? None of that has anything to do with sexual books being kids libraries.

 

And reproduction is enhanced by pleasure? If putting your penis inside a ***** doesn’t give you pleasure that means you size problem shorty

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

10 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

banning books is a slippery slope to banning more forms of artistic expression...oh, and more books.  and contraception. I'm glad u asked.  can we agree that reproduction is vital to the continued existence of a species?

So your solution to sexual books being school libraries is to leave them there in the libraries because if you remove them that is book banning and that will lead to banning more “artistic expression” which leads to bannning regular books and then pow banning contraception. 
 

Wow. Now you may need a book on how to reproduce but us regular humans have been reproducing without a manual for quite sometime.

 

 

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

Just now, redtail hawk said:

It might soon become that.  Slippery slope.  Desantis wants in your bedroom...and they say Biden is weird.

Explain how keeping sexual books out school libraries is a slippery slope to banning books in a public library.

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

Just now, redtail hawk said:

I meant a public library.  but as I recall, it's entirely heterosexual.  We gave it once as a dirty Santa present exchange.  Given every year after by the next couple.  was a good running joke but also practical.

But that’s not what the controversy is about, it’s about books being taken out of school libraries.

[DeSantis For President in 2024?]

35 minutes ago, redtail hawk said:

 

can you still check out the Kama Sutra?  Cuz it's Indian and sexual but informative.  Does Desantis understand that procreation usually happens thru sex?

Why would you want the Karma Sutra in a school library?

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

2 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

You saying that makes it ok for those Jan 6 animals to kill police? 

 

Wow! 

Nobody is falling for that, nice try 

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

Just now, Tiberius said:

Ya, not enough dead cops for you to care, huh? 

Whose side had the riots about police brutality again? 

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

3 minutes ago, Tiberius said:

And clubs and body armor and bear spray and shields and helmets and spears and battering rams and handguns. 

 

How is that not being armed? 

 

23 people charged with having deadly weapons that day 

For all those weapons there is a surprising low fatality rate that day! maybe the body armor, shields  and bear spray were defective and couldn’t kill as those items usually would. And a club and a spear I mean better put my gun down I am no match for that 

1 minute ago, Tiberius said:

One of your mom's boyfriends say that one to you? 

 Your MAGA mom in Montana did 

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

Just now, Tiberius said:

I've read enough of your trashy posts to conclude you are well below the average level of human intelligence 

And You’re still a load that should have been swallowed. 

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

7 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Why did they have gun parts?

 

Keep trying bro - it’s hilarious 

So nobody #*%*#+ with them.

They cooperate with the Capitol police, the police find it’s legal but the rest of the crowd aren’t none the wiser, it actually ruins your insurrection argument because you would have to cooperate with the police so you don’t get shot, kinda something you only do if you want to protest peacefully but are aware of unruly protestors.

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

Just now, Tiberius said:

They were armed, though 

 Apparently you can’t read either 

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

45 minutes ago, BillStime said:

I didn’t lose anything - lmao

 

TRUMP lost and his people were ARMED.

 

Why would they have GUN parts? You can’t square this lmao 

Again you aren’t intelligent to be asking critical thinking questions.

 

From your Twitter link that you posted it doesn’t seem like those 3 people did a good job smuggling in those gun parts, so they could put the gun together later, I mean if you want an insurrection it seems like the better plan is to come armed with an already assembled rifle because guess what even though it was legal to posses gun parts, you just flagged yourself for suspicion and the chance of assembly of such weapon later drastically goes down. 
 

So here is another thought. DC already has high crime and add in crowds that are  protesters and counter protesters, we already seen what a mob can do, sometimes for one’s own safety you need a presence.

 

Even your not stupid enough to start something to someone who looks armed and guess what when the police question what you have which in your link did happen, you are in the clear.

 

 

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

5 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Why would they bring PARTS of a gun?

 

You can’t prove that the other parts weren’t smuggled elsewhere with others.
 

 

 

You made the claim they were armed, you don’t have any proof they actually were and you cannot prove there were other parts on any other person to complete the set up. 
 

You lost.

 

 

 

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

1 minute ago, BillStime said:

But it does matter… they were going to pair them up with their corresponding parts later and you know it.

 

You can’t prove that and neither could the source YOU provided.

 

 

[The January 6th Commission To Investigate The Insurrection]

2 minutes ago, BillStime said:

Why were they caught with parts of guns?

Doesn’t matter why, it is legal to do so if you read what you posted. Which you didn’t. Why do people make the shape of a gun in their coats, to make people think they are armed when they aren’t but that’s neither here or there, in this case it was legal to do so.

 

But you, being a shining example of a liberal just read a headline and the bolded part and read what you wanted to read without any reading comprehension of the story.

 

You couldn’t wait to post that and when someone like me read literally a few lines down from what they wanted you to read it made you look stupid. Now it goes from “they were armed!!!!”  To “well they COULD HAVE been armed.