Commsvet11
-
Posts
496 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Commsvet11
-
-
4 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:
All good man, and I get where you are coming from, but I just dont think its as different as people think.
What are you talking about, I have mentioned Brady a lot lol...read more than one post.
Prolific Passers
Rodgers, Brees, Rivers, Luck, Ryan and Stafford.
You didnt include Brady.
Your thinking of building a defense first is just wrong, there have been many times that the bills fielded an excellent defense but it didn’t do any good and there is a decent defense right now it means nothing because we can’t score.
Same problem last year only it’s much worse.
This FO has just one year to fix the offense and it’s not going to happen with the resources and time they have.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:
I totally agree with you on that. And I am not saying McD will be good at that, I am making the case there is no way to know that today given the talent he has to work with this year and the injury to Allen.
I will say he managed to take a bad offense to the playoffs last year, and during a year most thought we would win 5 games around here. So he has earned the benefit of the doubt until the personnel gets better next year. End of next season, if the offense is not vastly improved after investing in it this off season, then his seat will get hot.
You quoted a bunch of stuff not directed at you...lol. So dont take it personal, I like your posts and you as a poster.
But, what about 2015? Just 3 years ago. Broncos won the SB with the worst QB's in the NFL that year in Manning and Brock during the regular season, and then won the big game with the worst QB performance in SB history for a winning QB.
Flacco won the SB with mediocre offense a couple years before that. Seattle won the SB and almost back to back with run first offense. I mean this was all in the last handful of years. Most SB's have-at least one team that isnt a prolific offense over the last 10 years, and several winners. Giants beat Pats TWICE...who had the most prolific offense in NFL history at that point with defense.
I meant there are more examples the last 10 to 15 years that say the opposite.
Meanwhile: The most prolific passers: Rogers, Brees, Rivers, Luck, Ryan, Stafford, etc have barely sniffed the SB and combine for only 2 SB wins.
I noticed you left out Brady.
-
Just now, Alphadawg7 said:
Here is the thing thought: People need to stop comparing McD to Fox or Fisher. They got fired for being bad HC's. Fisher has the most losses in NFL history for instance.
There is fairy tale going on amongst this board that suddenly feels this false narrative that a HC with defensive backgrounds cant be good NFL HC's...all the while Belicheck has dominated the NFL and this division for almost 20 years as a defensive minded HC.
And a guy named Brady.
-
1 minute ago, HomeskillitMoorman said:
Quality head coaches understand both sides of the ball and have input everywhere. What you just said just further iterates that he should be a defensive coordinator, not a head coach.
And even if you're OK with his only duty for the offensive side of the ball is finding the right person to run it...he's 0-2.
And that’s another problem in itself. He is stuck with his OC. He can’t fire him and get a quality OC because he will be on the hot seat next year, any OC won’t take the risk of being dismissed after one year.
-
4 minutes ago, Alphadawg7 said:
No, people are using this thread as an attack on McD like hes so stupid for starting NP. Well he has NOT started NP yet. As of today, he is the ONLY ready QB. So TODAY he will say NP. Period. To draw any conclusion about McD or this decision is stupid, he is CURRENTLY the ONLY healthy and ready QB.
If someone else is ready by Sunday, they will start. But right now they are not, so to WANT him to say someone else name is silly. He cant, and won't until there is another name that is ready to play. So yes, stupid thread for how people are using it against McD
So who started game 1?
-
Well, if someone has the time;
there should be some polls on who the fans wanted to draft on each season.
Lets assume a majority on those polls wins or frequency of a player in a round on mocks and compare those to see if that player fell to the draft spot the bills had. If that player was gone next popular choice.
-
2 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:
This thread is clearly sarcasm. Those other threads? There are people who honestly believe that Pegula is going to rise up and fire either Beane or McD right as if that will really happen.
I remember you saying along those lines about Whaley like a day or two before Whaley was fired. How did that go?
-
1 minute ago, Bangarang said:
Isnt that exactly what this thread is?
No, no, this is being “critical”.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, vorpma said:
If this team is not improved by this time next year; then you got me! Give them then off season!
That is always the retort from the not so smart fire everybody crowd! Who?
But how many more wins will next year yield with the limited resources?
And how how many wins will it take for them to save their jobs?
Do you think it would be enough?
-
2 minutes ago, vorpma said:
Will you give it some time!!!
How long should I give them?
-
16 minutes ago, vorpma said:
Are you looking into your crystal ball little guy?
I don’t need to. It is very simple.
There isn’t enough resources vs time.
The Bills have ten picks, but how many of those will be actual NFL day one starters? How many will be offense
You have FA but these players who actually do make it FA have to fit a model set by this FO and compete with other NFL teams finically and reputation-wise.
We have to base improvement from a wins stand-point. How many of those resources will contribute to wins?
Grumble all you want about how coaches don’t get enough time, but that is how it is in the present NFL.
-
1
-
-
11 minutes ago, vorpma said:
Get a grip Junior!
The standard is 3 years not 5. There is not enough time nor resources to fix what has been done.
The F.O. has already committed their firing offenses, they just won’t be fired until next year, which is stupid when it can be done as a proactive measure right after this season.
-
Just now, vorpma said:
The Millennials are on the warpath today!!!
Damn those millennials! They want to kill off seeing the Bills bad. The old timers saw how bad the bills were in the olden days and PAID for the privilege!
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, BillsEnthusiast said:
I enjoy knowing we are getting a top-5 pick and 90 million in free cap for a shopping spree. I enjoy not going 7-9 again.
Tell me how is all that going to help?
How many actual starters will be drafted? Who will you get in FA?
-
1 minute ago, Wayne Arnold said:
Because (a) his play was not nearly at the level of the salary we were paying him, (b) the team saved $56 million in cap space by trading him, and (c) after this season all of the Dareus dead cap will vanish for good.
Do you think any free agent is going to be compensated fairly for their pay or will buffalo have to overpay?
-
8 minutes ago, jrober38 said:
Yet people seem to trust that he's going to massively upgrade the offense over the offseason.
Those folks know exactly how next years season will end, they just have delude themselves longer because they worry that no coach with a super awesome 5 year plan will come here.
But deep down they know.
-
It would be the smart move to move on after this season.
This isn’t getting fixed in the off-season. There won’t be enough Carolina cast offs in FA, and any other FA has to be part of their precious process as well as their draft picks, speaking of the draft resources, the players drafted that give immediate impacts will be at the very best 3 players and the first draft pick will be defense player anyway.
-
8 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:
Who coached them?
I lovr you guys. When it's something from that draft that supports badhing McD, he ran the draft. When it doesn't all of a sudden it was Whaley.
I think Pegulas will give them the time
I cannot name one person here who has not said something to the effect that until they draft a QB nothing else matters. So they do that and they're still wrong.
Pegulas give 5 years? Not happening.
-
4 minutes ago, John from Riverside said:
Because of one qb who sat for a year and now is playing on a all star team of offensive players.......
By the way....Mahommes just threw his 6th interception in the last 4 games.....and ppl think he would not throw more with this offensive trash.....comical
His offensive line is keeping him clean....his OT's are playing outstanding.....and ppl think he would get that here....comical
Everytime I read something like this I tend to agree which begs the question why aren’t the bills like those other teams where QBs are put in a position to succeed?
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, oldmanfan said:
Google the 2017-2018 playoff teams and get back to me
It isn’t a playoff team now is it?
The idea is to get better not worse.
Your logic is they will burn it down and build it back up, but what you fail to realize is, this even if this coaching staff and FO are good enough to do that which is questionible, will they have the time see their vision play out?
The last part is critical, see if the results this year were close to last year it would have been possible, that’s why you see other teams making do with the talent they have and build on that, it gives them more wins and more time to build their team to the final product as they see fit.
Next year is what they have left, and because of the holes that have to be filled, it won’t be successful either.
It isn’t predicting, this coaching staff and FO has already made their reasons for being fired.
-
4 minutes ago, oldmanfan said:
We are all disappointed this year. We will see what they do with their picks and cap space. Too damn many people here think they're Nostradamus.
It isn’t difficult to recognize this FO and coach will fail because of their philosophies.
-
Gronk will do what Gronk always does, and the Bills will let it slide.
-
1 minute ago, Thirdborn said:
Yes, I believe her.
Belief is not proof.
-
1 minute ago, Thirdborn said:
yeah, I'm mad, bro. This is !@#$ing ridiculous. there are other qualified judges available. Keep pushing this clown ... we'll see what that gets your party.
It’s ridiculous but not for the reason you think it is.
-
1
-
McD - we do have wins, although they are not always on the scoreboard. Saw some Bills style football yesterday
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
That one guy meaning Brady, uh yeah that kinda does, since he was in 6 superbowls.
You can can preach your arachiac mantra of defense wins championships (which is quickly going away it’s not a fad)while I say offense gets you that championship and now wins them.