Figster

Awesome

We all know Taylor needs to improve areas of his game and I'm really not sure what the point is your trying to drive home. Your not going to convince me Lynns thoughts on Taylor had anything to do with the design of the G Roman O. We averaged over 5 yards an attempt in rushing, best in the league, and everyone knew our intentions. Why are you (or Lynn) trying to fix something thats not broke?

thanks for all the research fellas

Taylor has much to prove, I get that, but when you say Lynn wishes the Bills O was better in the passing game operating out of a run heavy O that he didn't design, the comment means nothing to me. (Lynns)

Wouldn' t Taylors top 10 QBR and TD to INT ratio suggest to you that T T can handle more on his plate in the passing game, not less?

I just have an opinion and its no better then yours are anybody else. Practice makes perfect though Tee and everyon just needs to realize the Bills O put more time and effort into the run game and less in the passing game then any other team in the league. It was by design and Taylor/ passing ability had zero to do with it IMO. Do you see me insulting Tee, bang, or anybody else that disagree's with me? You got that right...

gotta run, it was fun, I could care less what Lynn who has zero experience as an OC said, with all due respect Tee

Taylors 47 TD's and 12 INT's speaks for itself. For the record HC Rex Ryan wanted a run heavy O and Taylor delivered with the best running O in the league while keeping his overall QB rating top 10. What I find mind boggling is trying to blame Taylor for the design and intentions of the G Roman O.

Nice find on Foles Taylors TD to INT ratio beats everyone else on the list Big Fitzy fan ? Then they shouldn't have devoted so much time with the run game. I agree

I figured without looking A Rodgers and Cam Newton would be the exceptions. Do you realize Taylors stats were accomplished operating out of an O that registered the lowest pass attempts in the league? 3 to 1 TD to INT not good? Then why does everyone say the low wonderlic of JK or Dan Marino wouldn't cut it in todays NFL? Suggests to me the NFL has gotten harder on QB's, not easier...

Bradys first 2 seasons as starter, 47 TD's and 26 INT's (Top dog) Peyton Mannings first 2 seasons, 54 TD's and 43 INT's Do you consider ball protection in your assessment? ​

Compare Taylors first 2 seasons as an NFL starter with any QB in any Era you wish including the elite and tell me how many you find that scored 47 TD's (passing and rushing) and only 12 INT's Let me know what you find...

Astro

thanks, lets add 10 more making it 47 TD's and 12 INT's for Taylor

Franchise QB is just another way of saying face of the franchise in my humble opinion red. When we think of the Pats we think Brady, Diego/ Rivers, Saint's/ Brees, Packer's, Rodgers and so on.

real clever, Taylors first 2 seasons as NFL starter 37 TD's and 12 INT's Jim Kellys first 2 seasons as NFL starter 36 TD's and 32 INT's Which QB helped the team more ? JK had a championship caliber GM and coaching staff, Taylor had below average GM/ coaching that got sent packing.

Not a bad way to define it IMO. So we have Taylor going into his 3rd season with HC McD building a team around him.

I agree 100% A franchise QB is what a team says it is and like it or not your description may suffice.

Say what you want, Nobody knows for sure Taylor is not a franchise QB. Just for fun though compare T T's first 2 seasons as a starter to the hall of famer J K

I don't accept bridge by way of description...

On a side note I noticed how polite you have become on the board lately John and it suits you well. Good luck buddy

Good posting

Awesome, thanks for the heads up. yip yip yipeeeeeeeEEEEEEE!

High murder rate perhaps

We see it in our favorite video games. We entertain ourselves with crime shows, horror, war and sci fi movies. We see it making news headlines, and If you live in Chicago you might get a first hand glimpse. We even pretended at an early age with little plastic army men. Times have changed and along with it the ability to fantasize at greater lengths to feed our hunger. We can believe civilization as a whole has become more civilized, but lurking just bellow the surface there is an ugly attraction that still haunts us. I'm having a Big mac attack...