Figster

moore? but you are Italian so...

innovative coaching can go a long way in uniting the systems and its players and to me its one of the main ingredients in the recipe for success in the NFL IMO. The league is constantly evolving with rule change/additions and new ways to attack and defend the opposition with a revolving door from player injury. Get innovative or get beat... good point Biscuit, and you also wonder how much of the HC rubbed off onto the assistant.

The success or failure of a franchise is determined in so many ways by the ability to find the right fit in my humble opinion.

I'm one of them, Already a big Taylor fan and see the Bills QB position looking very intriguing to say the least.

I agree grb, thanks

By posting their production? I agree with the rest of your post. It seems relevant to the discussion in my humble opinion. (with all due respect)

Petermans dart throwing style/ mechanics can be improved upon to get more velocity on some of his throws in my humble opinion.

true that

Makes sense to me if someone wants to use the Watkins/Woods #1 and # 2 by way of example that their production be posted along with it. ( IMO ) Everyone just needs to keep in mind the Bills pass attempts per game average is the lowest in the league. ( under 30 )

3 and out stat /ranking sounds worse then what it is IMO Its worse then getting one 1st down and out after the second set of downs, but clearly not a back breaking stat thats hard to overcome with good special teams in my humble opinion. The Pats/Brady won a championship with higher 3 and out numbers so to me it helps prove the insignificants. with all due respect

Does average D or below get you playoff results? (18th would be considered below league average) I agree, the O does have much room for improvement. ( Patriots had more 3 and outs then Buffalo )

I don't think I am, 16th ranking, 18th ranking, is that supposed to help your argument?

I understand, Less participation from TBD's more football knowledgeable patrons is not the answer though IMO.

vs contributing and making the conversation sound a little more intelligent? People from different walks of life frequent the boards and some more educated then others. Everyone likes to chime in and talk football regardless and in my humble opinion they all have something to contribute.

When you look at where the O could be with even a slight improvement in the passing game it becomes easier to understand why McD wants to see where Dennison/Taylor will take him with better Defense.

Right, and the O made the most of it ranking 10th in the league in PPG. The problem is giving the opposition the ball deep in its own territory and watching them march the entire length of the football field. Can you see how that works against us? with all due respect

The whole idea of how a run heavy O will succeed is not with a middle of the pack Defense. Middle of the pack is not a good Defense. when the opposition continues to flip the field on you despite a good run game its a recipe for failure.(IMO) Its very likely that with a better D the Bills O would have ranked even higher in PPG in my humble opinion. Starting field position is key...

I agree, We may win many of our matchups with the Pats, but playing the best team in the league twice a season appeals to me. Tom Brady is history in the makings ...

thanks OP Dennison seems well versed in adapting to the strengths and weaknesses of the QB /football team. nice work

You and me both

Yes he is, icebowl has also been here on TBD for years, I'll ask you the same thing icebowl, How well would you/Packers do in the AFC East?

Nice reply The coaching upgrade (IMO) puts every player on the Bills roster in a better position to succeed. thanks OP

I'm not sure where all the confusion came from. Amen I want to bump this post

innovative