Taylor doesn't need a clean slate my friend, his body of work so far for a 2 year starter in the NFL is fine.Tyrod Taylor detractors would like you to believe the G Roman O was scaled back because Taylor couldn't throw the football and its simply not true (IMO).
I think they should go back and watch film on other O's Roman managed.
McD/Dennison have every intention of carrying over the Bills run game and when you have Shady and T Mobile behind center it makes perfect sense.
We all know Taylor needs to improve areas of his game and I'm really not sure what the point is your trying to drive home.
Your not going to convince me Lynns thoughts on Taylor had anything to do with the design of the G Roman O.
We averaged over 5 yards an attempt in rushing, best in the league, and everyone knew our intentions.
Why are you (or Lynn) trying to fix something thats not broke?
Taylor has much to prove, I get that, but when you say Lynn wishes the Bills O was better in the passing game operating out of a run heavy O that he didn't design, the comment means nothing to me. (Lynns)
I just have an opinion and its no better then yours are anybody else.
Practice makes perfect though Tee and everyon just needs to realize the Bills O put more time and effort into the run game and less in the passing game then any other team in the league.
It was by design and Taylor/ passing ability had zero to do with it IMO.
Do you see me insulting Tee, bang, or anybody else that disagree's with me?
You got that right...
Taylors 47 TD's and 12 INT's speaks for itself.
For the record HC Rex Ryan wanted a run heavy O and Taylor delivered with the best running O in the league while keeping his overall QB rating top 10.
What I find mind boggling is trying to blame Taylor for the design and intentions of the G Roman O.
Nice find on Foles
Taylors TD to INT ratio beats everyone else on the list
Big Fitzy fan ?
Then they shouldn't have devoted so much time with the run game.
I agree
I figured without looking A Rodgers and Cam Newton would be the exceptions.
Do you realize Taylors stats were accomplished operating out of an O that registered the lowest pass attempts in the league?
3 to 1 TD to INT not good?
Then why does everyone say the low wonderlic of JK or Dan Marino wouldn't cut it in todays NFL?
Suggests to me the NFL has gotten harder on QB's, not easier...
Bradys first 2 seasons as starter, 47 TD's and 26 INT's
(Top dog) Peyton Mannings first 2 seasons, 54 TD's and 43 INT's
Do you consider ball protection in your assessment?
Compare Taylors first 2 seasons as an NFL starter with any QB in any Era you wish including the elite and tell me how many you find that scored 47 TD's (passing and rushing) and only 12 INT's
Let me know what you find...
Franchise QB is just another way of saying face of the franchise in my humble opinion red.
When we think of the Pats we think Brady, Diego/ Rivers, Saint's/ Brees, Packer's, Rodgers and so on.
real clever,
Taylors first 2 seasons as NFL starter 37 TD's and 12 INT's
Jim Kellys first 2 seasons as NFL starter 36 TD's and 32 INT's
Which QB helped the team more ?
JK had a championship caliber GM and coaching staff, Taylor had below average GM/ coaching that got sent packing.