MAJBobby

And I clearly clarified my weed suspension to the positive test as that is what the majority have been in the NFL. And someone that can follow a conversation can see that as It was the links strictly to a question about the TESTING Policy

I have him as a 4th round Grade.

Even though the full player vote might be a week or two away. They would not be doing this if NFL and NFLPA doesn’t think it passes.

everytbing PFT writes is slanted to the players. Hence saying oooo the fact sheet says this but players “Don’t Believe it” our source says otherwise. happened last CBA as well. really where I posted the fact sheet. It says nothing in there about game suspensions for a positive test. So I will wait and re-engage once I see posted a NFL or NFLPA Fact sheet or the full CBA that says there will be suspensions for a positive test.

so where in the fact sheet does it say that there will be Game Suspensions. Show it to me.

Because that is how they are. They still have the “testing” program. They can keep their history of see we are still testing for something illegal in our state. Blah blah blah. Completely get rid of it they lose those Conservative Owners that still think it should be banned and the Owners do not approve their own CBA

TO HAVE THE CONSERVATIVE OWNERSHIP group OK the CBA. there have been at least 7 owners that say weed should not be allowed. They needed to get some of those owners on board

nope. That is Due Diligence. Like EVERY team does. A Visit conveys interest.

sure how many people will they catch in a 2 week testing window with a reduced testing pool and a 150ng limit. window dressing for the “Conservative” ownership group. Changes to Drug Policy-- Narrows the testing window of THC from four months to two weeks at the start of training camp -- Reduces the penalties to players who test positive for THC, eliminating any game suspensions strictly for positive tests --Reduces the number of players subjected to testing for THC -- Increases the nanogram limit from 35 to 150

exactly like transporting 153 lbs over the international border. again anything PFT writes about this situation is slanted to one side. And it is always going to be against the owners

We have looked into him and even talked to him,” said Beane. “Nothing more than that.“

I always laugh at sports reporting. Beane says they had a Conversation with Josh Norman. Sports reporters Bills interested in Josh Norman.

doesn’t say that ANYWHERE in the fact sheet. Does it? So until I see the CBA that says otherwise I keep my point that a Positive test will not result in a suspension. so how many PS players except a “Futures” contract over going to get paid in the Spring? Additionally once XFL can show the pathway to the NFL I am willing to bet you start seeing College Recruits defect to the Paid league as well.

Negotiation Tactic. And guess what it worked.

yes strictly for positive test no suspension. So again No suspension for a Weed Test. As I stated. under this CBA Josh Gordon would have never had a single suspension.

because it is clear as day in the fact sheet. Elimination of suspensions for positive test. meaning NO SUSPENSION for weed. https://nflpaweb.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/PDFs/CBA Proposal Fact Sheet Final.pdf Reduces the penalties to players who test positive for THC ,eliminating any game suspensions strictly for positive tests.

T there will be No Suspensions for Weed Clear as day in the second bullet talking about it. https://nflpaweb.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/PDFs/CBA Proposal Fact Sheet Final.pdf

Watching

See my links I added. Remember PFT is Always against Owners will “tailor” their posts that way https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomangell/2020/02/20/nfl-would-end-marijuana-suspensions-in-deal-circulated-by-players-union/

they are no longer going to punish for Weed.

AFC 1 seed Bye - Best Record 2 vs 7 3 vs 6 4 vs 5 not to difficult. Then a reseed that has 1 vs 4 2 vs 3

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28783678/nflpa-reps-vote-send-proposed-cba-full-membership-approval

Proposal is 3 Preseason 55 man Roster 48 Active PS expanding to 14 have not seen that in the new proposal anywhere

This was a sticking point at one point. Seems owners tabled the 18th game for at least 10 years.