The Frankish Reich

Best division in football, top to bottom now?

The kind of game I would have to have money on in order to actually watch

Bo Nix: calling it now, he's a bust. Zach Wilson is on that roster and I'd say there's a 1 in 3 chance he could actually still be good. What is Sean Payton waiting for?

Can't believe y'all are missing this actual news about MSM journalists behaving badly. The hot journo-babe having Face Time sex with the old nutcase Her mob-raised boyfriend threatening her The envious other journos who don't have the ability to flirt for stories https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-family-secrets-of-ryan-lizza-whose-fiancee-olivia-nuzzi-cheated-with-rfk-jr

That reliable Alt Media!

No fair. That's like that other trick question, "Do you want Ukraine to win?"

That’s what happens when we are less than a month away from deciding a two person race.

It’s almost as if they were right when they projected it going from a CAT 4 to 3 to 2 to 1. I will never watch the Weather Channel again!

Roger Stone, an actual ******* in the literal sense, with the ill-advised sex joke!

Well ain’t that clever. Never mind the top of the ticket. We got the Hillbilly Cato!

They are both awful. But it’s like the rings of hell. Kamala is ordinary awful. Trump is a special kind of awful.

You mean there’s two of them? Two Posobishits?

No one cares about some kind of innocuous edit. If you’re right, the actually edited out one of the more powerful/concise responses she gave. So a big nothingburger. And yes, she is more mentally adept and smarter than her opponent, which bothers you to no end because you wanted to keep harping on Biden is Senile rather than Trump is an old fool.

Oxen

So as I told you, Kamala's campaign is running an ad here in AZ (get me outta this hellhole of nonstop political ads and 110 degree temps!) featuring her in the debate. Trump is not running "THEY'RE EATING THE CATS" or anything else from the debate. I wonder why. He is, after all, superb at this off-the-cuff stuff.

True. And you clearly see my point: it all depends on whose ox is getting gored.

Biden just gave a perfectly coherent and strong response to Trump’s silly allegations about the federal government dragging its heels on emergency response.

Commsvet, you make good points. Unlike some others with “expertise” in this area. But unaddressed are these points: - why send ANY essential equipment directly to Putin at that point in time? Why? You suggest it may have been an act of friendship/comity. But then … - why deny it happened? The Kremlin said it did. And Woodward didn’t just make it up. If it was normal and important to maintaining good relations, well, then admit and explain. It’s just … weird. this “what if” game can go too far, but here it’s fair to say “what if it had been Biden and the recipient had been China”

I’m in Arizona now. (Mistake. I was I formed that the heat breaks last week of September.) Kamala is running an ad with one of her debate answers. It is obviously rehearsed, but is delivered well, and forcefully. I would call it an effective oral argument. I don’t know what “off the cuff” means to you. Having talking points and delivering them effectively is modern politics. She is perfectly fine at that. She doesn’t wander into a silly stream of consciousness consistent with mild dementia.

SC automatically gets assigned Jacksonville. Maybe Trevor Lawrence’s girlfriend goes to Matt Gaetz’s orgies. Something to hang your hat on.

You really think stream of consciousness riffing on sharks, Hannibal Lecter, etc is evidence of good off the cuff speaking skills? Only one remaining candidate is mentally fit, and it ain’t Mr “Dampen the Forests” subgenius.

True. These folks support any and everyone who posts leaks, including Julian Assange, who made a career out of it. But a boring assessment of JD Vance crosses the line?

Funny, I thought it worked pretty damn well in 2020. That is why we call him “former President Trump”

She is a more talented off the cuff speaker than her opponent. Right now that’s the relevant test.

That edited bit you cite is coherent and expresses solid support for Israel. So where’s that liberal “word salad” you guys are harping on?