Jump to content

GunnerBill

Community Member
  • Posts

    64,435
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by GunnerBill

  1. Actually his specialty is press zone coverage and he did extremely well in Schwartz's Cover 2 that utilized him that way. Seattle uses a press Cover 3 and obviously a player like him could always press on the C2 side of a Cover 6. Gilmore has got a lot to offer in a lot of defensive schemes, just not so much when he constantly gets put on an island like in Wrex's dumbass scheme. What I don't know is how he'd play in McD's Cover 3 that calls for CBs to typically use the bail technique rather than press. Between that, him (obviously) wanting to move on and the cap situation the Bills are in I can certainly understand why he wasn't re-signed here.

     

    Indeed. What I meant is not "just" a zone corner. I was typing whilst in a work meeting.....

  2. Some of the comments coming out from players (Jon Beason, Steve Smith et.al.) is alarming and makes me wonder about the character of our new GM Beane. Is he a disciple of Gettleman? Did he praise his practices? Or is he his own man that also felt the same negative way about his old boss?

     

    Beane pre-dated Gettleman. He is more a Marty Hurney disciple if anything.

  3.  

    holy crap, I guess we ain't talking about Gettleman anymore. lol.

     

    so there's like different cultures in English cities eh? In what sense? Pubs are different? different cuts of chips?

     

    Pubs, music, attitudes to sport.... cuisine.... traditional industry.... even the racial profile of the people who live there in terms of which waves of immigration settled in different places. Basically all the things that would be different in different cities around the world.

  4. If it's any consolation guys we have the same thing over here...... Stoke-on-Trent (which is where I am originally from) is technically midlands but it is much more culturally similar to Liverpool and Manchester (which are north west and about an hour away) than Birmingham which is midlands and also about an hour away.

  5. They needed a good corner and had the money, but Gilmore showed a very selfish side to him that I wouldnt want as a coach or teammate. I see him like Byrd in his contract year, totally sold out his teammates and in the end after ruining his reputation he ended up being overrated and overpaid.

     

    Sold out his teammates who hadn't taken the time to learn the defense and didn't know the calls? Yea.... I'd have called them out too. A bag of wet cement would have been an upgrade at the safety position for us last season.

  6. No we won't. There isn't a competition being held. We may see someone emerge if Tyrod gets injured but there aren't guys competing to start now.

    We will see in camp.......... we will see who wins the #2 job (and hence who gets a shot if Tyrod is injured or possibly late on if the season is lost). To think that there is any competition for the starter job is ludicrous.

  7.  

    the NFCS hasn't had a repeat Division Champ since 2002. Yes, they've made the playoffs and the Super Bowl, but as a franchise, they're erratic. The Pats* and -well us and NYJ & MIA are the model of consistency. :wallbash:

    Not true.... the 2014 and 2015 Panthers went back to back.... tho they won it at 8-7-1 in 2014.

  8. Odd timing. Four GMs gone after the normal firing season this year. I know there were certain circumstances in Washington but the others maybe indicate NFL teams have started to think that the traditional firing season doesn't really work for personnel people given the way scouting and the draft works? Maybe the Bills (who have made our last 2 GM changes right after the draft) are ahead of the curve for once?

  9.  

    I think the main area in which we disagree is the extent to which today's head coaches are really utilizing analytics on game day. I believe most still coach by their gut during the course of the game because of the intense scrutiny of the position. There are only 16 games, so if one of these decisions supported by the algorithms doesn't pan out and the team loses, the coach may theoretically lose his job. For as many fans/reporters/etc. there are clamoring for teams to use data in their decision-making, there are just as many who would be the first to criticize a coach for not taking the old school, conservative approach.

     

    Maybe. But teams are doing the scenario planning with their analytics guys now... so Head Coaches are not blind to the data on gamedays. Do some still just revert to gut and conventional wisdom in the heat of battle? Sure. But I think some coaches are making smarter decisions on things like 4th downs, 2 pointers, FGs and challenges now and I think the fact that most teams have guys actually doing analytics and not looking at over generalised surface level numbers helps.

  10. isn't he like 2-22 in his games since 2014?

     

    2-20 with the Buccs and Browns. He has started games in 9 NFL seasons. Only 1 of those 9 did he end up the right side of .500 his 3-2 record with the Bears in 2013. That is a career win - loss of 18-42.

     

    His career TD-INT ratio is 79-69.... again that is bolstered by 2013 when he went 13 TDs to 1INT. Take that year away he is 66-68.

  11.  

    You apparently didn't read the last sentence of my response. I also think you are grossly underestimating the level of "gut" coaching that still goes on.

    I did read your last sentence and that was my initial point. Analytics done properly is an incredibly useful tool but part of the problem in the differences in understanding is the surface level numbers masquerading as analytics that don't build in the situational variables. I think teams get that much more than fans.

     

    As for whether I grossly underestimate the gut coaching... I don't think it is that - as I said to Thurman I think it is more that the occassions when uninformed fans shout "analytics" to criticise a coach who the analytics would almost certainly support stand out to me much more vividly because I have this bug bear about anything with numbers being labelled "analytics". Analytics isn't using numbers it is actually interpreting them and the surface level stuff just doesn't do that.

  12.  

     

    IMHO most of them don't do it because if they go for it and don't make it there'll be a massive firestorm aimed at the head coach, whereas if he goes conservative, no firestorm because he's doing what the conventional wisdom has long championed. So even if the analytics, both general and situation-specific say go for it, most teams still won't.

     

    Yea of course to some extent that is true. It just grates on me when I see twitter reactions to coaches who the analytics would support getting hammered for ignoring analytics. Particular bug bear of mine I suppose so I tend to notice those situations more, they stand out to me.

  13. i think it plays a role. i certainly rooted for manning over brady any chance i could get.

     

    I'm not saying you are wrong.... I think it is human.... as I said I really dislike Rafael Nadal for no other reason than he was Federer's rival. It's the same principle. But I think for a lot of Bills fans it means they are predisposed to think Peyton Manning is this loveable, angelic type figure rather than the flawed individual that he is.

  14. i'm more on the side of liking manning, but i just don't get the dislike for him. a tea bagging incident? is it amazingly d-bagish? of course, but people move on. hell...let's not forget that brady completely took off on his pregnant girlfriend when he felt he found someone better. one doesn't make the other more right or wrong, but manning strikes me as much more likable.

     

    This is what I am talking about..... Bills fans like Manning because he isn't Brady.

×
×
  • Create New...