Buffalo Boy
-
Posts
6,892 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffalo Boy
-
-
9 hours ago, John from Hemet said:
We have been complaining that our receiving talent core is so bad
it will be interesting if all of a sudden they are not
They were snatching balls out of the air last week ..... when they were finally there to be snatched?
7 hours ago, JM2009 said:To be fair Benjamin has only been here one game.
KB doesn’t have the best hands on this team.
Hes just big.
4 hours ago, joesixpack said:Which means 8 visits yes? 8>0
Man, I have enjoyed the heck out of trolling theCowgirl fans for years.
Romo was MONEY.
Like Cliff Clavin on jeopardy, you just knew it would never end well???
-
1 hour ago, Mike in Horseheads said:
Was move at QB a Good Move or Bad Move
The move was good!
Will NP be good???
-
34 minutes ago, dave mcbride said:
I was one of those who was really unimpressed by him last season. I was wrong! That said, the entire offense had a massive upgrade, with Whitworth being the most important one. He has dominated.
Point being that it takes some cats longer than others. He clearly sucked last year, as a rookie on a bad team but he kept his head down and got the experience.
-
I’d be surprised.
He needs the remainder of the season to grind and see if he can be coached and progress.
As Mr. Tuel said, TT is done so let him grind.
-
Hope!!!
-
1
-
-
But I was repeatedly told that Goff sucked and wouldn’t amount to anything this preseason???
These numbers can’t be right.?
-
I grew up on Kelly, Marino, Esiason,Montana etc.
Those were QBs. They led offenses worth celebrating.
I celebrate Phillips’ Defenses. Those were fun to watch. The offense led by Flutie was not exceptional.
The idea that Flutie was on the cusp of some miraculous era and he had the rug yanked out from under him is delusional.
In the other thread I hoped for 17-25 for 225 and 1 TD from a rookie making his first start!
A ROOKIE making his FIRST start.
Or as some of you would say, the APEX of QBing?
-
10 minutes ago, JM2009 said:
Benching Flutie was good for the franchise. ok. Do people even think about what they post?
AS is Benching TT. And there are still a bunch of Butt Hurt TT lovers lingering in the shadows just hoping Peterman fails so they can shout "I told you so!"
-
Just now, THEHARDTRUTH said:
Dont shed tears for Skin Flutie. His adult film career is thriving.
That must be a "Short" feature:)
-
5 hours ago, reddogblitz said:
Worser and worser? Really?
We won 6 out of his last 8 starts.
But yeah, worser and worser ...
1999 Flutie last 8 starts stats
Ravens 155 yards 18of 40 1 TD 3 Picks QBR 32.8
Skins 211 16of22 2 0 133
Phins 157 10of20 1 0 93.1
Jets 220 22of40 1 2 58.3
Pats 207 9of16 2 0 140.6
Giants 184 15of32 1 1 66.5
Cards 239 21of32 2 2 82.7
Pats 212 22of35 0 0 79.7
Total 1585 56.1% 10 8 85.8
2 good games (although 9of16 is sketchy) , Two bad games and a bunch of TTesque Dreck
239 was his highest output. I suppose its gonna be the old, "He was playing within the system" BS?
They were 2nd in rushing attempts and scored 15 in the air(13 by Flutie) and 15 on the ground that year. Defense was 2 in points, 1 in yards.
These rose colored glasses you all wear when you think back to the Original Saint Doug are sad. He was a crap, weak armed QB which is why the owner decided to force the switch.
RJ turned out to be a bum also, this is not my argument.
-
Not cool!!!
Figured at least 9 points from him this week with 15 being a definite possibility
-
42 minutes ago, joesixpack said:
Man , there’s the pump fake but no jump......
or ball for that matter.....?
-
50 minutes ago, JM2009 said:
Anyone that doesn't appreciate what Flutie did in his play and what he did for the organization has no clue IMO. Not surprised here.
Fred Smerlas-and I'll take his football opinion over yours-has always been of the belief that the Bills would have been farther ahead with Flutie.
Well now, Even I couldn’t argue with Freddy?
-
24 minutes ago, JM2009 said:
So did the QB who touched the ball on every snap. That was a terrible move.
RJ couldn’t hand the ball off as well as DF?
He won with a last minute comeback.
-
4 minutes ago, JM2009 said:
Doubt it. Chargers, Miami, Colts very winnable with TT.
RJ played one game against a bad Colts team, and that got RW all excited for him too play. Flutie earned the right to play that game.
This figures. Why am I not surprised?
The Defense and ball control run game got us to that game.
-
21 hours ago, simool said:
Well you have Joe in NJ, so self-explanatory. Buffalo Boy who appears to be a grown man that likes to be called boy, being an RJ fan does not seem like that big of a stretch from there. Then you have RJ who feels it is necessary to alert you to the fact that its not that RJ, then proceeds to carry that RJ's jock.
Just another day on BBMB2
So....
Back in the Bledsoe era, the week before we played NE in the second season, I got the name Buffalo Boy by one of the local radio guys as we were arguing about the upcoming Bill-Pats games.
It was clearly meant to be pejorative but F him. So I own it. Mark from Charlotte just doesn’t have the same ring.
As, already stated RJ turned out to be a Bum.
In 98 though he wasn’t terrible when he played. Nor was Flutie.
Then Flutie played Miami, Sub 60 Percentage completion, 1 TD, 1 BRUTAL pick and some other bad plays and lost the game.
The following year Flutie got “ worser and worser”to use the local vernacular . His nickname could have been “ Bat Down” or “ Jump n Pump@ for that stupid fake he would do.
He would not have won the Titans game!!!
He had been figured out by the league already and the Titans were playing good D in the playoffs, regardless of what certain posters on here wish to believe.
-
1 hour ago, kdiggz said:
ask me after Sunday
There are so many questions:
How conservative is the game plan?
How much latitude are they giving a Rookie at the line of scrimmage? NP has shown the ability to make pre snap reads that seems to already surpass TT. Kinda getting sick of seeing Shady tackled for a loss.
Does NP rise to this occasion? There has been no pressure on him till now and he’s appeared fairly composed. Does being a starter change this. Does a bad play or series change this.
How does the Oline and receiving Corp react to him.
After this weekend we will be able to answer these questions better but I know this. I haven’t looked forward to a game like this for a while.
-
17 of 25 for 225.
1 TD, O int. If he does have a pick it’s because our receiver initiates a tip drill.
YAC will be better than we’ve seen, markedly.
Run game will be 175 including 20+ from QB
-
1 hour ago, BigBuff423 said:
Honestly, I don't know that you can answer that question with clarity since each QB takes their own time to truly know....like you said, in retrospect, those other guys we should have known quickly. However, as with Wentz, he started the whole year and threw 16 TDs to 14 INTs - and on this board, that gets you benched but look at him this year. I think, JMO, you know when you see the guy throw. It's not always about stats, it's about how he commands the Offense, how he throws the ball, where the throws the ball, how the receivers are able to catch the ball and what can they do after the catch, if he can recognize Defenses appropriately and audible, and how accurate he is because in the case of Wentz, his completion % was 62.4 last year, a solid number.
Now, don't mistake my use of Wentz as an example to say that I think Peterman is or could be Wentz, I'm just saying I don't know that stats tell the whole story, which is very much the case for Tyrod. His stats aren't terrible, but when you watch him play, at least for me, I know that he's a truly gifted athlete and good guy, but he can't QB in the NFL. His skill-set doesn't match the demand for what the NFL requires NFL QBs to do....
Goff might be an even better example
Many had already written him off before this season started.
-
6 hours ago, uticaclub said:
According to Tyrod fans, at least 40+
Where is the Tyrod breakdown?
A bunch of us saw him for who he was before LAST season even started.
In terms of Peterman, I think we will see by the end of this year and some of us will have a fairly decent idea.
I want the kid to do well but if he is only competent then we need to take a QB early next year.
-
12 minutes ago, joesixpack said:
Hey, wait a minute....
Darn!!!! Thought I could “ slip that one in” as it were???
-
14 minutes ago, joesixpack said:
time. I always was pulling for the Dough Boy to get a shot.
As is plainly obvious.
-
1 hour ago, nedboy7 said:
I support the move. I just don’t see how there will be enough therapists in Buffalo if peterman doesn’t put up Brady numbers.
This isn’t about playoffs for me. This is about seeing what we have over a decent period of time to plan for next years draft.
If he is GOOD. That would be awesome but I definitely reserve judgement a t this point.
-
10 minutes ago, row_33 said:
RG3 got hurt and they put him back out there when he was clearly unable to play, disgusting
Kap just suddenly snapped, mostly in his head, and wasn't able to play at his best anymore, you could probably pinpoint the exact second it happened like when Lisa broke Ralph's heart
The Flutie move BURNED exactly the right people that I was hoping it would. Quite enjoyable and it still isn't over with based on responses here...
Man, You aren’t kidding about that brother!!
Youd have thought I called their mommas ugly?
[closed]Why the rush to Peterman this week......
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
Because, for the second time TT has been benched when the regime decided he wasn’t the guy.
The Playoffs were a pipe dream before the season started and still are.
The prudent move is to see what your semi promising backup has and set yourself up for next season.
This Defense looks shot also.