-
Posts
7,046 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Buffalo Boy
-
-
1 hour ago, Fleezoid said:
I propose we call the defense Hank. I've always liked the name Hank. It's the salt-of-the-earth, old-fashion, blue collar kind of name.
I got something you can Hank
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Brianmoorman4jesus said:
“The Bible” because the book was written on it years ago.
We have watched the same game by this defense for 7 years straight. 2017 it was good. That offseason teams learned how to get to it. We have still not changed. Our coach that is only here because of defense but wins because of the offense.
If we had an ounce of competence on that side of the ball, we’d have 2 rings. And it’s not the players. We have good players on defense. It’s 100% the coaching. We have 3 LBs that can run and cover and get mauled by every physical team at the point of attack. We are the one team in the league that can play a base defense every down and instead We play nickel more than anyone. We are stubbornly obsessed with doing what we want regardless of it working or not. If a good DC was here and had complete authority over the defense, we win the Super Bowl
It’s too early in the season for that kind of reali…… err, I mean negativity.
Am I fanboying correctly?
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Not at the table Karlos said:
Came here to say this
Me too
-
1
-
-
The Man
The Super Man
The best we will ever see in a Bills uniform at QB
-
45 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:
From a game theory, statistical, and/or probabilistic point of view, it was the right decision. Simple math says so.
From a subjective point of view, it's hard to say. How much would've that first two-point conversion, which was likely to be converted, meant beyond the scoreboard in terms of momentum and team morale? How much would failing the two-point conversion - which was unlikely but did happen - hurt momentum and morale? Given the probabilities, was it worth the risk? You decide. But I think a lot of coaches would've made the same decision that Sean made.
I think you are right.
But, what is maddening is he is conservative when he needs to let it hang out and risky when prudence might be more prudent.
-
1
-
-
26 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:
Thanks for this. And you're exactly right.
Logically and statistically, McD made the right decision on the first two-pointer. When it failed anyway, he was forced to go for the subsequent 2-pointers. Each decision was rational by itself. But we failed on each of them so hindsight says it would have been better to kick all those EPs.
A coaches job is to make the right decision at that specific moment in the game.
The team was reeling. We were already in “ catch-up” mode and no one should have had any expectation that our D would stop Baltimore making every point sacrosanct.Going for the first one down 8 points was not the right call in that game at that moment.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, JakeFrommStateFarm said:
I'm just curious. After the TD by Cook, it was 27-19. Why go for 2 point conversion there ?
Why not just kick the extra point and have the score be 27-20 ? Down by just 1 TD
Anybody know what McDermott was thinking ?
He wasn’t …. He wasn’t thinking….i said it in the game thread…..inexplicable
-
2
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, HIT BY SPIKES said:
Most ==> JOSH ALLEN
None ==> SEAN McCOLLAPSY
Fact!!!
6 hours ago, transient said:I give the most credit to the failed 2 pt conversions. If not for those bad decisions the Bills would’ve been up by a point with time running down and it would’ve been our defense getting torched for a walk off game winning FG.
Sadly, you have a point
-
1
-
-
23 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
The Ravens fans are blaming coaching. Which is an eternal truism in the NFL. Fans overblame coaching and underblame talent. That is consistent across all fanbases.
But they have a point
-
1
-
2
-
-
6 hours ago, GunnerBill said:
Yep. As soon as the Ravens went into prevent and the receivers had room to work Allen was unstoppable.
Imagine if we gave him receivers who got open from the start of the game. How about that as an idea?
This is where I do n’t know if it’s :
Early season sloppiness ?
Poorly schemed routes/play design ?
The Ravens D being on fire but wearing out ?
Watching Brady call those behind the LOS plays repeatedly….. against Ravens players who were closing on the receiver in nano seconds, was frustrating!
-
I’m out.
Poor Josh.
I feel legit bad for him as I’ve said before. He deserves better than all of this that he’s been saddled with.nighty night
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, buffblue said:
Almost like we've seen this movie before
Well, some of us have🤷♂️
-
1 minute ago, Bangarang said:
Our WR room is so mediocre
🤫
We quietly got better….
-
-
The thing about the Ravens is they aren’t the smartest team either.
This same thing happened in 23. They whooped us in the first half and Josh got us the win .
But, this is still ugly as heck to watch
-
3
-
-
Hence, I don’t like it. We are already chasing points. You take the 1 and try and get a stop.
STUPID
-
Don’t like this
-
2 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
Bishop can't stay out there folks. He doesn't know what he is doing at all.
Yee of little faith
He can…..and he will
-
2
-
-
Hanging on by more than a thread
-
1
-
-
Back shoulder to Coleman
Tgats what we got him for!!!!
-
1 minute ago, Big Turk said:
At the end of the day, I don't really care about what happens until the playoffs because it's all meaningless.
We are going to win the division by at least 3-4 games and until McDermott's D doesn't fold like a cheap tent in elimination games what happens in the regular season doesn't matter
That a boy!!!!
That’s the kinda positivity we need
-
Raven doing STUPID stuff….
Thank you Ravens!!!!
-
4 minutes ago, Comebackkid said:
brady thinks this is a playoff game?...
The D certainly does😂
-
1
-
-
That score is much closer than this game so far
Nickname for our defense
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Oh No!!! We Suck Again D