Trump_is_Mentally_fit

Well, he is leading in polls now, Marjorie Taylor Green is a leader of that party and so is Jim Jordan. I don't see them "growing up" anytime soon. And yes, the Dems did change course after losing in 84, but this group of GOPers just simply declared they were cheated instead of accepting defeat. Sure, they might change, and I'm sure they will eventually, but as of now it ain't happening. This demographic shift has been underway for decades and will continue, the nation is changing and the Southern Strategy that Nixon started in 1966 after the Civil Rights Acts passed is basically what Trump won on in 2016. That strategy is played out and the GOP does not seem to get that. Yes, they may shift by 2028, but it is hard to teach an old dog new tricks

On no, this trend won't swing back and forth, this GOP is a dead man walking. Keep nominating morally deprived trash like Trump and you guys will get beat worse and worse each time. There's a reason why in the light of Romney's loss in 2012 some in the GOP called for trying to broaden their appeal to a larger section of the population. They didn't and got real lucky in 2016. That won't happen again

Frank, I'll just add this from the article: About 48 percent of Gen Z voters identify as a person of color, while the boomers they’re replacing in the electorate are 72 percent White. Gen Z voters are on track to be the most educated group in our history, and the majority of college graduates are now female. Because voting participation correlates positively with education, expect women to speak with a bigger voice in our coming elections. Gen Z voters are much more likely to cite gender fluidity as a value, and they list racism among their greatest concerns. Further, they are the least religious generation in our history. No wonder there’s discussion in some parts of the GOP about raising the voting age to 25, and among some Democrats about lowering it to 16!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/07/19/gen-z-voters-2024/ Every year, about 4 million Americans turn 18 and gain the right to vote. In the eight years between the 2016 and 2024 elections, that’s 32 million new eligible voters. Also every year, 2½ million older Americans die. So in the same eight years, that’s as many as 20 million fewer older voters. Which means that between Trump’s election in 2016 and the 2024 election, the number of Gen Z (born in the late 1990s and early 2010s) voters will have advanced by a net 52 million against older people. That’s about 20 percent of the total 2020 eligible electorate of 258 million Americans. And unlike previous generations, Gen Z votes. Comparing the four federal elections since 2015 (when the first members of Gen Z turned 18) with the preceding nine (1998 to 2014), average turnout by young voters (defined here as voters under 30) in the Trump and post-Trump years has been 25 percent higher than that of older generations at the same age before Trump — 8 percent higher in presidential years and a whopping 46 percent higher in midterms.

Wow

The case against Trump for inciting a riot is pretty easy to make First he spread a lie he knew was not true Then he called a rally based on that lie, the “Stop the Steal” rally The rally he called for and planned was on the day of the certification of his defeat He then pumped the crowd up with more lies about how they were being cheated After enflaming them with lies and violent rhetoric he had them march on the capital He then refused for hours to stop the violence, a clear dereliction of duty. People died as a result of his “stop the steal” riot, that’s manslaughter at the very least There is no way you did not know this, more willful ignorance on your part The law includes threats of violence if those involved have the ability to immediately act on the threat. Inciting a riot, according to federal law, is defined as the acts of "organizing, promoting, encouraging, participating in a riot" and urging others to riot. Rioting and Inciting to Riot - FindLaw https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-charges/rioting-and-inciting-riots.html#:~:text=The law includes threats of,and urging others to riot.

Just weird that you spent so much time arguing for a criminal. You must love that criminal. You are wilfully ignorant, no matter how its spelled. It was not just a bad idea to stir up a mob on 1/6, it was criminal in how it went, people died, and Trump should be held accountable

Stupid

On the very day Biden was to be certified, and his mob, that he stirred up violently delayed that and people got killed. You think its ok what he did, let him get away with it. No you are wrong. Putin interfered in our election and Trump welcomed it. His team met with Russian officials, encouraged their efforts and even took Paul Manafor, a Putin plant, into the campaign. Even called him a genius for murderously attacking a peaceful nation that Putin simply wants to crush To say there was nothing in the Putin attack on our election is to show yourself to be seriously and wilfully ignorant

He organized the rally right on that day and sent them to the capital. The only reason to do that is to "Stop the steal."

So that's a no, then.

What if I say yes? What if I say no? Do you understand how supply and demand works? Also, "western sources"? You speak like a Kremlin clown or Baghdad Bob

You have seen the evidence, did he stir up a riot in your opinion or not?

Yes, it sucks that the pro-Putin side isn't better represented, is that right? Maybe if Hitler had better media support in the US during WW2 things would not have been as bad. How stupid!

You seem like the one that can't handle the truth. You really think Trump didn't try to violently interfere with the transfer of power?

No, you are wrong. You seem to have lost the argument and have turned into a crap throwing monkey

Whelp! There it is