In-A-Gadda-Levitre

I forgot to mention that if you're running Internet Explorer V7, you need to reinstall that as well here the order would be: 1) run sfc 2) reinstall IE 7 3) reinstall WMP

but it's sooooo easy to see who is the troll

ok, I'd rebuild Internet Explorer and clean up any obvious corruption by running the System File Checker, assuming that's your browser. You might need the Windows CD to replace some files. Click Start, click Run, then type sfc /scannow, and then press ENTER. Restart the computer when System File Checker is finished Then reinstall the latest version of Windows Media Player here If this doesn't work, you have some other corruption in Windows that won't be quite so easy to resolve

yeah, you choose a restore point from before the time that the malware was loaded on your computer.

I'm assuming Windows Media Player still works, make sure. Reinstall it if it doesn't. If that doesn't do it, START/ACCESSORIES/SYSTEM TOOLS/SYSTEM RESTORE/ and check RESTORE MY COMPUTER TO AN EARLIER TIME

did a quick google of kelsay eagles trade and not 1 page came up with that scenario color me suspicious

you got it bro

the reason is risk - many free agents, especially pro bowlers, have proven they (at least during some seasons on some teams) can play in the NFL and excel at their position. In the draft you can get a Mike Williams or a Marshawn Lynch. Yes, of course there are no guarantees with free agents either, but the risk is way lower.

yeah, I've been thinking about this scenario as well, since just about everyone agrees that the primo WRs in this year's draft can wait until late RD 1 or into RD2 my only concern is the perception that he can't stay healthy

this is an important statement, although who knows what the agenda is. It says that the Bills believe he has a learning curve ahead, beyond the typical rookie WR maturity that's been discussed many times. IMO they might draft him, but will also draft or trade for another WR who can produce sooner.

or we will make a serious effort before his current contract expires to sign him to a long term extension

take it to the bank

oh yeah, forgot to mention a few other interesting facts... algae sequesters 90% of it's weight in carbon dioxide, read this as takes greenhouse gases out of the air. under the Kyoto Protocol (ok, so our fearless leaders refused to sign it, don't bore me with the details...), companies get paid for this stuff, in some kinda reverse pollution credit, currently about $15 per ton. a system based on this technology would remove about 270 tons of carbon dioxide per acre per year per acre in its current development state

click 'Listen Live' in upper right corner

which Les Paul is it? I know a guy...

here you go, it's official 2008 NFL schedule

This company is experimenting with producing vegetable oil from algae aka pond scum, in a vertical, high yield, closed-loop system. Most corn or soybean crops can yield 20-30 barrels of oil per acre per year. This technique is estimated to yield up to 100,000 barrels per acre per year! CNN video Biomass Magazine article

Saying that cap is not absolutely necessary is just a negotiating tactic. They want the NFLPA to believe that it's not that big of a deal. If there was no salary cap, parity is gone and it's pretty hard to conceive that the league will allow that to happen.

Anthony Bialy is not someone I usually admire or agree with, but he's right on the money with this article. The Bills absolutely need a WR and TE foremost, everything else can wait until after that. We can trade down to get more picks, but choose the best WR that's available, then get a fast, preferably tall TE that can catch the damn ball!

was that Chris Drury that skated up to Avery in the crease after the screening and said something?

Most of the AI and newer lenses work on the Digital SLR bodies, here's a good chart from Nikonians

NFL.com Draft's Top Tight Ends I like Purdue's Keller - he's fast, strong, runs good routes, and has a great feel for the ball

mistake, he was signed by the Chiefs

great stuff!

I hear what you're saying, but most of what I've read and seen is very consistent. On one side you have the Dept of State, the CIA, some former Justice Dept (i.e. Jack Goldsmith), and most of the journalists and authors. On the other you have the neocons like Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc. The latter wanted a regime change and railroaded it through, pushing aside moderates and 'voices of reason'. For what it's worth, Frontline does a pretty good job bringing in experts that were on the ground and in the meetings. It's not like State, the CIA and journalists or authors are saying different things happened. There's a few people like Feith and Yoo are trying to justify their actions and contest the moderates/journalists/authors views, but they're the minority and they end up looking pretty stupid in the process.