TakeYouToTasker

You can change your name, not your gender. He's a dude named Chelsea.

It's impossible to know for sure, but some slaves likely did participate in the building and furnishing of pyramids. The pyramids most certainly were built by and for slave owners, however; and slaves were entombed along with their masters.

As little love as I have for Joe Arpaio, he would have been a political prisoner, which is scary to contemplate.

He can call it a concentration camp all he wants. "con·cen·tra·tion camp ˌkänsənˈtrāSHən ˈˌkamp/ noun plural noun: concentration camps a place where large numbers of people, especially political prisoners or members of persecuted minorities, are deliberately imprisoned in a relatively small area with inadequate facilities, sometimes to provide forced labor or to await mass execution. The term is most strongly associated with the several hundred camps established by the Nazis in Germany and occupied Europe in 193345, among the most infamous being Dachau, Belsen, and Auschwitz." Now, is Tent City a concentration camp?

Tent City is a concentration camp? You're an idiot.

The major problem is the advent of the unitary executive. Our government wasn't designed to have a "President whose job it is to get things done" outside of the scope of their specifically designated powers.

This is stupendous.

I'll add "logic" and "arguments" to the list of things you aren't bright enough to do correctly.

No, you're not.

Anyone who hasn't gone through the proper channels of having their status legalized over a 20 year period isn't interested in becoming legalized. If that's not a priority for them, then they don't need to be here.

That's not how logical argument works. You've made a positive assertion. It is your obligation to defend it. You don't get to make fiat declarations and pretend that they stand as fact until someone else comes along to prove a negative.

Racist institutions you ask? Howard Dean tells us "You're a racist if you vote Republican"

This law does not apply to the President and Vice-President, as receiving gifts is one of the protocols of the office. Both must report gifts with a value in excess of, I believe, $350. The giver of the gift must differentiate if the gift was intended to the sitting President (or Vice), or the Office of the President. In the case of the first, the sitting President is free to keep the gift when they exit the Office.

I'm giving 50/50 odds, given her background, that she has raised this poor child to believe they are transgendered.

I would posit that the fact we're talking about the system dismissing these cases is evidence of the system working. Further, I always find it hilarious that the political left is always screaming about how bigger, stronger government is the answer to most problems, but fail to recognize that the police are the acting executive arm of the government when they make their case.

If you're interested, you'll both probably enjoy Daniel Boorstein's The Image: A Guide to Pseudo Events in America It's absolutely illuminating.

Actually, it's that "There is nothing wrong with Antifa! They are fighting Nazis!"

I'd say it's reasonable to care about individuals espousing a broken ideology accounting for well over 100 million deaths over the course of the last century; and even more reasonable to care about violent militant Communist agitators assaulting people and destroying property. You don't think that's reasonable?

Wait, what? Trump is a Leninist?

No !@#$ing way... That's not real and I'm not getting Rick-rolled by clicking that link. No way that's true.

Wait, what? Not that Richard Nixon was a conservative, he wasn't, but before you say things like this you should really do some reading and learn about the original charter of the EPA under Nixon. Trump's stated goal was to return the EPA to that original charter. On the EPA, the two are exactly the same.

If that was the case, it would still put me at least 12 months or so ahead of you. With that said, I have no problems with posters who have bad opinions, or different opinions which I happen to disagree with. Case in point: I don't have you on ignore. 34 doesn't have a long history of intentionally ruining otherwise potentially interesting discourse. He's just dumb and has a deep authoritarian streak, and he's only been at it for a week. I doubt many here, if any, have him on ignore at this point. Gatorman has been at it for so long that a sizable number of regular contributors have him on ignore to improve our board experience, and your constant engaging him both encourages him to stay at it, and makes his nonsense visible again. But you don't give a !@#$ about the quality of the board, or anyone else's experience, so keep on douching it up.

That would be fair if this guy develops a multi-year history of board degrading nonsense like gatorman has.

And here we are again, with you seeking to criminalize thought. "The IDEAL itself is the enemy." Thoughts don't harm people, actions do, and the government is absolutely fantastic at !@#$ing Nazis, right along with anyone else, who engages in criminal activity. For instance, erecting and burning a cross on someone's lawn is a crime no matter who does it. It doesn't matter if the person erecting and burning is a Nazi, or if it's your grandmother, because it's not the idea behind the burning which dictates the criminality, but the action itself. There are acres of daylight between thought and action, and people are perfectly free to think and verbalize whatever terrible things they wish, so long as they don't act them out. Ideas don't kill people, actions do. And you know what? If Nazis start taking action outside of rhetoric, domestically we'll send in our Nazi !@#$ing units (you'll note that Dylan Roof and James Fields were both quickly apprehended, the former now on death row), and internationally we'll invade France. However, as a practical matter, no one in the West is in any real danger from Nazis. You are more likely to be killed by a vending machine than by a Nazi in the United States. The only reason this is even a conversation, is because the fringe left have received far too much deference from the government in recent years, and now radical militant Communist fronts, having not been smashed into the Earth by law enforcement for engaging in rampant vigilantism and violent activism, now believe that it's their business to engage in extra-legal !@#$ery. It isn't. Nazi !@#$ing is the government's business. In fact, it's the whole reason we even have a government.