FireChan

Oh, like the 2013 games against Atlanta and TB?

You wouldn't say Foles is better than the guys failing to compete with Matt Cassel?

Joe Buscaglia ‏@JoeBuscaglia 42s42 seconds ago Woods' helmet came off and he just kept swinging at Gilmore, who still had his helmet on #Bills

Tanny is the second best QB in the AFCE by far, so I will accept them being higher.

Joe Buscaglia ‏@JoeBuscaglia 1m1 minute ago EJ Manuel picked off by Wes Miller on a horrid throw. Wasn't even close

Agreed. Both those guys are leagues better than Manziel so far. Guess that exonerates the Bills.

Are you kidding? Bridgewater looks to be the best QB from the 2014 draft. The Bills "missed-out" on him. My personal opinion of him leading up to the draft is irrelevant.

Is Johnny a QB or not? Being wrong about how Teddy would be as a pro does not mean I didn't want to add another QB. I'm not a scout, I can get career trajectories wrong. I can also fault not attempting anything.

I wanted another QB leading up to the 2014 draft. Those analysts are the same ones who get blasted when they mail in a story ripped from the Syracuse Chronicle? Or get half their predictions wrong?

On the right path by looking like black Jake Locker?

Tanny is costing them $4M and $11M against the cap the next two years. The horror. Bridgewater. No one is acting like the league is full of anything. Actually, in this thread someone is acting like the Pats signing Ryan Lindley on August 10th means the Bills have devoted enough resources to finding a QB.

There's this thing called a draft.

Not try to find a franchise QB at the tail end of the offseason?

Because he's retired? They also passed on Elway.

Every team drops a couple they should've won.

Can I see a link to that? It doesn't even matter. The NFL is making more money than ever. All this outrage nonsense hasn't hurt the brand at all.

Luckily no one is arguing that.

I posted prior to that "Assuming they are the same woman."

No. That's not what I meant. Lemme try a new way. Hypothetical solution. There are two girls. One of them is sitting on a guy's lap all night, laughing at his jokes, clearly into him/flirting. The other girl is not doing any of those things. The guy takes each of them into a room, where sexual contact occurs. Which one is more likely to have consented? Clearly the one that has been flirting with him. Does it mean she did? No. Does it mean she "probably" did? Not necessarily. But I'd still say it's more likely than the other case. And looking in from the view of a jury, if that was the only evidence, that shadow of a doubt would be enough to not convict Kane. And that's why the bar report matters. Even though obviously no means no and all that stuff. I'm not saying she deserved it, or played him on, or anything else. Just probabilities and how it looks.

No one is claiming Kane was justified raping this girl. I don't know why you're on this self-evident tangent.

So we're just pretending those actions don't point to probabilities? C'mon.

I'd love to see that stat. We had no idea how friendly they were. If she was standoffish towards Kane all night in the bar, would that make no difference? Obviously not. Assuming it's the same girl.

Yep. Him opting out hurts us.

Biting and scratching don't necessarily mean rape. Carry on. At least you're honest.

What? I think you're the one implying something here. It only means nothing because there were no rapey vibes in the bar. It provides no evidence that a rape occurred, which is something.