Bigfatbillsfan

I have a better idea. Why don't you go !@#$ yourself? American is progressing and beginning to move forward into the 21st century. Think of PPP as kind of like a refuge for people who are afraid of this. A place where they can be among others who feel the same way. It's also a place where losers like 3rd grade can come and feel like their twisted opinion matters. They don't have a life in the real word. So they come to this little wild life refuge.

Sounds like the Phoenix PD.

I admit I go there too. For the same reason.

When I get "stung" is sure as hell won't be by 3rd grade. And no, I don't take myself all that seriously on this forum. The rest of the board? Fine. But here? I don't come here for great conversation and debate. I will debate with a select few that I feel are here for serious debate. When the craven shows up. I tell him to !@#$ himself. That's about what he's worth.

Why don't you go back on Wordnik and play with the rest of the boys and girls your own age? Humpty Dumpty will be there too. If that doesn't sound appealing to you, why don't you go !@#$ yourself? Yes, the media are douche bags. That's a given. And no, TM was not a little cherub. We know that too. So now what is the purpose of posting the pictures unless you are trying to make the point that what TM looked like on the night he was killed somehow justified GZ's actions? If you make a loaded statement by posting those two pictures side by side be ready for some blowback.

What is the point of showing the difference between those two pictures unless you are trying to make a point that how he looked on the night he was shot was somehow relevant to GZ's actions.

Oh, this changes everything. Now that I've seen a picture of him the night he was killed I can tell he deserved to be shot. This changes nothing. We know that TM wasn't an angle. But that doesn't justify GZ's actions.

Wordnik? Are you kidding me? This is how they describe themselves: "At Wordnik, we believe, like Humpty Dumpty, that words mean what we want them to mean" I know that's a site you may go for word meanings in your kindergarten class, but you're talking with adults now. Dear God, that just makes me feel dirty. I need to take a shower.

Holy Christ. Wiktionary? I must hold true to my former statement. You are a jackass. Now please go !@#$ yourself.

I would have to agree. If the Prosecution is going to try to use past character flaws to bolster their case, the Defense should be able to use TM's in Zimmerman's Defense. Well then, consider yourself dismissed. Feel free to go !@#$ yourself.

Dude, beat me to it. I was totally about to make that same joke. And yes, I would.

And that's just this week!!! True, but that being said, is there a time when in the most heinous of cases that we should make a statement? Most would agree that Texas goes a little overboard but I have to admit that there are time when I think a person should be put to death. It's something I struggle with since I am mostly anti death penalty. Sometimes I think we have to make the statement that a person is so utterly depraved that they are not fit to live in this world.

Oh, I think he knows what I mean.

Here's an assignment for you: Look up the following words in the dictionary. After learning what each word means put them all together in a sentence and see if you can glean some meaning from it. Go !@#$ Yourself

Good, at least I'm not the only one that feels that way. The assignment you gave me? I believe you asked me to do something and I told you to go !@#$ yourself. That hardly seems like you handing me an assignment. So please, go !@#$ yourself. Are they sure they were watching the right trial?

The person who is claiming stand your ground should also be responsible for proving that they are not the initiator of the confrontation.

I live in Flagstaff, Arizona. Hippie capital of the universe. In AZ all you have to do is prove you felt your life was threatened at the time you used deadly force. Nor do you have any responsibility to try to retreat from a threat.

His lawyer looks amazing. As with you I have only seen a little bit. But the defense is making the prosecution look like a high school football team taking on a pro team. I know that the defense is not claiming stand your ground as a defense for GZ's actions but I still think that law needs to be tweaked. It's written similar to what we have here in AZ. In it's current state a person can start a fight with someone. And when that someone is kicking their ass they can pull out a gun and shoot them. It happens here all the time.

No, it's not a word you jackass.

No, the opening post holds the contention that BoA refused to uphold the conditions of the deal they made. And did so intentionally. It's about the actions of the bank. Let me answer for Tom. TARP is not HAMP. Therefore your point is invalid.

The first part of my post was originally in a quote of one of Birdog's posts. I predicted that one before reading Tom's response. Tom operates on a pretty predictable system. If Birdog gave him a redirect to the original point Tom would claim that Birdog was incapable of having the discussion with him. And "dismissable" isn't a word you jackass.

You have to read his posts over again to figure out what he's saying because you don't know how to read well. and idiots tend to dismiss what they don't understand. That's part of what makes them idiots. You also spelled "I'm" and "dismissible" wrong you jackass.

Bird Dog, Just a friendly tip. You're arguing against Tom's straw man. The main point of your opening post is that BOA signed a contract stating that they would help struggling home owners in return for a massive amount of money. They then failed to uphold their part of the deal. That's the point. Tom is arguing that HAMP is not TARP. I'm sure soon he'll be telling you you don't understand any of this. Check. Oh no, we've entered the part of the thread where 3rd and Tom start jerking each other off.

So you post a transcript of a person who shovels **** for a living and ask people to not attack the messenger? Not to mention that I didn't even attack the messenger. Read what I said again. It sounds like one of Mr. Limbaugh's three hour mouth dumps. That's describing the transcript, not Limbaugh dumbass. Paranoia abounds. You seem even more paranoid here than you did on the "other board" Who is John Galt? An ass hole. John Galt is an ass hole. Holy Shcit! Are you a psychologist?

Sounds like part of one of Mr. Limbaugh's 3 hour mouth dumps.