Bigfatbillsfan

Oh my god... I'm so scared. I think I might have just crapped in my pants. (sarcasm included) As far as I can tell atain isn't even a word. Yeah I'm starting to realize I'm in a different league... with people that don't even have an argument, don't know what the hell they're talking about half the time, and when that is pointed out to them have nothing to offer but mindless insults. And the few jobs that are available will fall out of the sky and drop in your lap if you don't go out and look for them. That was J8's point.

There isn't a difference between attain and obtain they mean the same thing. There is a difference between procure and create. You can look them up in any dictionary.

I'm sorry, you must not have seen the post were DC claimed that job searches create jobs after J8 used the work procure. To me that says that he doesn't understand what the word procure means. I make no implication that you or anyone here was a moron.

I'm not quite sure where AD locks into job creation. If your point is that with more people working with buying power will increas prices and keep demand static I don't think that will work. If we produce more demand there will have to be more production so even if prices rise the rise in buying power will off set it.

I don't get how he would think that a group of people who are trying to destablize and destroy the government we recognize as the national government of the nation is not the enemy. Good example of double speech by the administration.

What he was was Job searches eventually bring job procurment. Procurment is ataining a job not creating a job. Though I agree that ataining a job does not create jobs directly remember that putting someone to work is going to create more demand now that they can afford to buy product and services. The more people find jobs the more demand for goods and services the more jobs have to be created to keep up with demand. Thats idea behind keeping people afloat during hard times.

Let me see if I can explain this to you again. What the professor was calling socialism was in fact communism. They are not the same thing. That's the part of the OP that I take issue with. No, I don't think grade sharing is a good thing but that is not socialism to begin with. Grade sharing would be more in the realm of communism. Socialism would be the fact that all the students have access to the teacher. Like I said. They are not the same thing. Did I say it was?

Most of my posts didn't make sense to you. That's because they were most likely a little over your head. In face I think most of the rights would always complain the the lefties' posts didn't make sense.

Wow, someone has some issues. You may want to talk to your doctor about Xanax. I am disputing something in your post. What the "college professor" was describing was not socialism. It was communism. They are not the same thing. I would tell you to look it up, but considering you didn't bother to find out if your E-mail was even true I would say it's safe to say that you wouldn't bother. And remember to talk to your doctor about that Xanax. It'll make you feel better.

according to snopes this never happened. Not to mention that what the "college professor" was calling Obama's socialism was in fact communism. They are not the same thing. http://www.snopes.com/college/exam/socialism.asp Please take the time to read the link.