Bigfatbillsfan

THAT'S RACIST!!!

Read my post again. That's not what I said. Do you have another straw man you want to try to assert?

Actually, most of us that can think might make the connection that it's a Russian news site and what was actually said may have been lost in translation.

Wow, you really put some work into this case.

I've seen quite a few of these and know exactly what you're talking about. I could write a dissertation on what this is about. But to sum it up in a quick sentence: It's because being an intellectual doesn't stop someone from being an !@#$. They do it for the same reason that my 5 year old will poke or hit my 3 year old in the back seat of the car while we're driving somewhere. She wants to get a rise out of her sister and see her get mad. My 10 year old has outgrown this particular behavior. However, these people making their "Blasphemy" videos have not. Personally, the only kind of person I find more annoying than a militant christian is a youtube atheist.

That's because your an ass

Holy ****! How did you know I was crying when I wrote that? I had giant crocodile tears running down my face realizing that I was so dreadfully wrong! First off, I was not aware at any point of back peddling on CO2's effect on the environment. Can you provide a link? Second if they have changed their stance on CO2 sensitivity due to observations made over time it's because that's how science works.

Dude, I love how you can always find a way to turn any thread into a global warming thread. Give it up man. You're on the wrong side of that issue.

The people of NC elected their leadership. This is the will of the people. I don't like the direction they're going in but I don't live in NC so I don't have a say in any changes. If you don't like the direction the state is going in you always have the option to move.

I have been. I still don't think GZ's claims of what happened that night add up. But I also don't think the state has been able to prove it's case. If I were on the jury I would find him not guilty. They might have had a chance to prove man slaughter.

I have been following the case. And Z's story just doesn't add up. However, GZ did not get out of his car intending to kill TM. What he should have been charged with is manslaughter. Not Murder 2.

Most thinking people capable of reasonable thinking have been asking these questions since the beginning of the case. Yes for some Z claiming Martin attacked him at told him he was going to die tonight is enough to make the case for self defense.

For all "intensive purposes..."

Getting your ass handed to you in a fight isn't an excuse to kill someone.

The only reason he's not on my ignore list is because it's fun to see what retarded statement he's going to make next. He's by far the biggest joke I've ever run into on a message board. And that's saying a lot.

I would say those are injuries consistent with getting his ass beat. And you spelled "consistent" wrong you jackass. But don't worry, I'm sure Humpty Dumpty and the rest of your friends at Wordnik with agree with your spelling.

The prosecution doesn't have enough evidence to convict. But regardless of whether Zimmerman is convicted or not what needed to happen happened. He stood trial. This was a situation that needed more investigation and it happened.

If you follow a "suspicious" looking person down a dark alley and end up getting your ass beat I would say you were just plain stupid. Does he have the right to defend himself? Sure. But if you're the one that escalated the situation as GZ did. You're still culpable for the person's death. Another good rule to live by is don't follow "suspicious" people down dark side yards. According to GZ. Sorry if I don't just take his word for it.

If someone was following me down a dark alley turning around and ambushing them is something I might do. You're walking home from the store and all of a sudden someone starts following you. First in their car and then on foot. That would scare the **** out of anyone. And under "Stand Your Ground" TM had every right to confront him. I think it could be said that he had a reasonable belief that his life was in danger. He was under no obligation to back down. I also find it hard to believe GZ's story given where the confrontation took place.

I'm not proposing that we try to introduce the unknowable as evidence. My post had to do with 3rd grade's statement that it was a reenactment video. It's not. It's GZ explaining his side of events.

By reenactment video you mean GZ explaining his side of what happened that evening. Unfortunately we can never get TM's side of the story now will we?

That wasn't a peace offering you jackass. That's me telling you I don't take my self or you too seriously. And you didn't read it liar. It's labeled "not yet read" in the PM thread. And I was totally wrong. You're an ignorant douche. So now why don't you go !@#$ yourself.

Don't worry. I won't be that hard on 3rd grade. Says the person who usually can only debate using his own ignorant, non educated opinions. What a Jackass. Now please. Go !@#$ yourself. Unfortunately you seem to be both paranoid and ignorant. Not a good combination.

Here's a copy of the PM I sent to you. I don't know where you get the idea that it's somehow asking for a truce. Just shows how incredibly stupid you are. And why the hell would I give a **** if idiotic dipshits like you laugh at my posts. It's not like your opinion is worth anything. Hey Bro, Don't take the **** I say out in the forums personally. Just busting your chops. I also don't mind you busting mine. Especially over spelling. Funny story: I once handed in a research paper with the word across spell all the way thru it with only one s. I'm sure you're really a great guy. Se you back out on the battle field bro. So now why don't you go !@#$ yourself.

You may want to make an appointment with a psychiatrist to see if you can get your paranoia treated.