Jump to content

R. Rich

Moderator
  • Posts

    10,311
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by R. Rich

  1. I like this little bit of info:
  2. The "hurry up and sign these guys" posts are forthcoming.
  3. One of the committee members farted after lunch.
  4. Yeah, yeah. So is Barry Bonds.
  5. Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions, on a sesame seed bun.
  6. Come to think of it, why didn't Congress subpoena Thunderlips for the hearing?
  7. You're forgetting about the June 1st cap cuts. Don't knock it; the New England Patriots were able to get some pretty decent players after the cap cuts. All is not lost, contrary to what you read here on the Stadium Wall.
  8. 1, 2, 3, and...............2????
  9. Which is worse: repetitive Bills related threads (in the absence of any new developments) or OT posts?
  10. What the heck do these letters mean underneath my username?
  11. Spoken like a true college basketball fan.
  12. The are? They have a pirate section?
  13. Watch your back, todd.
  14. Damn! Is someone from this message board attempting to give Rob Johnson a tiny bit of credit for doing something positive for the Bills? No way.
  15. Oh. My mistake. I wonder if I got a refund for the tickets I didn't pay for, the rental car I didn't purchase, the airfare I didn't need to pay for...
  16. Actually, "isn't anything Bills related" is a relative term (no pun intended). To some, 886 threads about the proposed Shelton trade, or Demulling, or what we can get from trading Travis Henry is okay because it's Bills related. To some, it's overkill.
  17. The "whole picture" also includes a beating we took AT HOME to a team that rested most of its starters. To say that everything was fine after going 0-4 is not realistic. As I said many times before, even if we were to get into the playoffs by winning that game, our weaknesses were exposed. I like the progress we made, but it wasn't enough. We're on the right track, though.
  18. You're not one of those anti-OT purists, are you? Those arguments get tiresome.
  19. A little too high, in my opinion. I'd probably rate it a C or C-. Big Mike is developing, but not near where he should be. Teague improved, but still struggles against bull rushers. Villarrial is very sound. McFarland wasn't given a real shot yet, so it's tough to evaluate him. Sobieski? An enigma. Price looks good at times (filling in on the right side) and then looks awful (when asked to take over for an injured Jonas Jennings). Everything considered, I'd give them a C, probably.
  20. Much like the football players, basketball players, and track athletes, he has nothing to do with this mess.
  21. Brown and Baas would be ideal, but, as I mentioned, it wouldn't be worth what we'd lose in moving up. There's good depth at guard and center, but those two are a cut above the others. But, I say again, it's not worth what we'd lose in moving up to get either of them.
  22. I agree. The only players I'd be interested in moving up to try to draft would be Elton Brown or David Baas. Considering where we are, I just feel it would cost too much to move up high enough to get them. Better to just stand pat and try to get the best player we can. In our mock draft, we wound up with the best center in the draft by staying at that pick
  23. You mean w/all of those virtues, he's still a free agent?
  24. I guess I should've said 'draft' instead of 'sign'.
  25. ...and Go Bills!
×
×
  • Create New...