B-Man

British Girls vs Migrants: The Real Story Remember, the Official Story is always, ALWAYS, wrong in at least one or more substantive details. So, it should come as no surprise that the British media is not only attempting to falsely spin the story of the young British girl who defended her sister from an alleged attack by a migrant sex pest, but appears to have gotten a number of basic details wrong as well. {snip} So, there are several obvious red flags in the Daily Mail’s version: He is a migrant from Bulgaria. No one said, or cares, how recently he arrived or whether he is “legal” or not. He is quite literally “a migrant”. The distinction between “illegal migrant” and “legal migrant” is arbitrary, irrelevant, and intended to obscure the issue. Presumably the police didn’t arrest him for the same reason they didn’t arrest any of the Rotherham rapists or the dozens of other migrant sex pests attacking young British girls. The police are evil and an important element of the war on the British people; the order they are employed to maintain is a wicked, anti-British, and anti-Christian order. She is carrying weapons at the age of 12 to defend herself and her sister from foreign sex assailants because she believes, correctly, that neither the police nor British men are going to defend her. The over-the-top victim rhetoric. “I am a human not an animal” is the sort of thing that third-worlders say because they behave like animals. A civilized individual never has any need to point it out. The “I could never” rhetoric. Never trust the word of anyone who attempts to substitute irrelevancies for actual impossibilities. “I was not there” is an alibi. “I have a baby” is not. He mentions “one more person” without clarifying that it was a third girl who is a friend of the two girls, an eyewitness to the attack, and was the individual who contacted the police. The article states that he was accompanied by his wife but not by their 8-month old baby. Was the woman with him actually his wife? You know it’s a Clown World propaganda piece in defense of the Narrative when they’re not accepting comments on the article. Now the real story from the mother of the THIRD girl who was there, who was an eyewitness to what she claimed was an attack by two migrants, and who called the police. https://archive.is/Rw8FC Never, ever, take anything the mainstream media says at face value. It’s always a spin and it’s always in the same direction. The fact that the story has already gone viral and spawned a series of effective means is why they’re attempting to get out ahead of it and spin their usual false narrative about how foreign invaders never did nothing to nobody and if you think they did, well, you’re just a racist. UPDATE: The BBC inadvertently demonstrates why British police reports cannot be trusted while trying to establish the Narrative. BBC News understands that officers have found no evidence to substantiate claims being made online the youths were at risk of sexual assault. The force had initially said she was 14, before issuing a correction. First, notice the focus on the claim of being “at risk of sexual assault” as opposed to the actual claim of “were physically assaulted by migrants”. Second, note that they didn’t get the age of the girl or the number of girls correct. And third, in the aftermath of Jimmy Savile and Rotherham, why would anyone take anything that the British police say seriously? They’re confirmed liars. UPDATE: Curiouser and curiouser. If this is the couple that attacked and filmed the girls, then the Bulgarian migrant being portrayed as the innocent victim by the Daily Mail wasn’t even involved at all and is probably just a crisis actor. It’s obviously not the same man; among other things, there is no cross tattoo on the neck. https://voxday.net/2025/08/28/british-girls-vs-migrants-the-real-story/

Hopeless. Meanwhile

Because she is a vile human being.

It is your thread.

Anything that you cannot understand usually is. (the problem is your biased view of both) .

That's fine because the post was obviously about Americans running guns to the British. As the Americans had to the Irish back in the 70's Try reading before you answer.

News,

Minneapolis Church Shooter ID'd, Disturbing Videos Suggest Potential Motive Matt Vespa https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/08/27/minneapolis-church-shooter-reportedly-identified-as-transgender-n2662424

Trump’s DC take-over wins praise from residents, biz owners as crime plummets: ‘We feel much more safe’ By Josh Christenson and Chris Nesi WASHINGTON — President Trump’s takeover of Washington, DC, has put hundreds of federal agents and National Guard troops on the streets of the capital to clean up crime — and a lot of residents and business owners said they’re noticing that things feel safer already. “All my employees, including me, we feel much more safe, and even our customers feel really happy when they walk into our store,” Indu Bhatia, who runs a liquor store half a mile from the White House, told The Post. Bhatia said her store was robbed so many times they had to sink piles of cash into renovations to increase security. https://nypost.com/2025/08/27/us-news/trumps-dc-take-over-wins-praise-from-residents-biz-owners-as-crime-plummets/

CHRISTOPHER CALDWELL: Land’s End. Whomever Britain chooses to lead it away from its era of multiculturalism, something big is going to change. In the United States, most deep reforms must travel a narrow road of constitutionality and survive the scrutiny of the Supreme Court. Britain has a different constitution. The democratic prerogatives of the British Parliament are almost absolute. It is true that, at the turn of the century, Blair enshrined the European Convention of Human Rights in British law and empowered a Supreme Court to vet parliamentary decisions. For now, such institutions and treaties impede any program of large-scale deportation. On the other hand, Britain’s proudly (or notoriously) sovereign parliament could abolish these Blairite guardrails in an afternoon. All three conservative leaders—Farage, Badenoch, and Jenrick—have, in one way or another, declared themselves open to the idea. Even relative to Brexit, or to what Donald Trump has done thus far in the United States, this would be an earthquake. It would take at least until the next election, but on present trends it cannot be ruled out. Maybe that will turn out to be what Brexit was for. Read the whole thing. https://claremontreviewofbooks.com/lands-end-2/

Another Trans Shooting John Hinderaker This morning there was a mass shooting at a church school in south Minneapolis. It took place in a neighborhood where I once lived. The school that was attacked, Annunciation, is where we would have sent our youngest child if we had stayed in the city. Reports on the shooting here. Two children were killed and 17 were wounded. The murderer shot through a stained glass window into the church, I take it more or less at random. The murderer committed suicide. The shooter has been identified as Robin Westman, formerly Robert Westman. {snip} So it is another mass shooting crime committed by a trans person. It has become obvious that trans people commit such crimes at a rate far disproportionate to their numbers. There are at least two possible reasons for this. One, gender dysphoria is a severe mental illness which now is not being treated as mental illness, but rather is being humored and encouraged. Two, trans people who transition are subjected to intense chemical regimens that may well impact behavior or aggravate pre-existing mental illness. The trans movement has been a disaster in every way and should be re-examined from the ground up. https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2025/08/another-trans-shooting.php

This prosecution of democrats is unprecedented.

Lets create some more confused, violent people.

Mental illness embraced by extremist democrats.

Trans belief is mental illness and it needs to be talked of this way.