dayman

So leaving out some of the things I find attractive such as long term rail (or even short term efficiency rail improvement) and moving towards green energy and a smarter delivery grid...this fits into your world view how? And I really don't mean to be attacking here but it begs the question raised in previous discussion with you...which basically gets to the point that you have communicated to me that human carbon emissions negative effects on the long term environment is a hoax. And if that is in fact the opinion...then even so...the economics of the nation...plays in how? And we might as well address the retrofit debate which is by far the one I am most passionate about b/c that is a nobrainer as I said earlier and one government should EASILY help facilitate.

The subject matter of Koppel's story and one that O'Reilly was willing to talk about was what you were talking about. That's all I'm saying. Nothing more, nothing less. Since I saw you posting that tonight and I saw that little exchange this week i though I would ask.

Not that it is anything "bold and fresh" or not talked about but have you seen the two interviews with O'Reilly and Koppel? You can find the O'Reilly interview Koppel clip on a google search and the Koppel interviewing O'Reilly clip on "rock center" website...both happened recently...general subject of the "debate" was what you posted above.

A while ago I posted a number of things I felt were noble movement to position us for the next century and you said you agreed with most (or at least some) of them...but might not agree with "my position on how"...do you have the patience/time/energy to address this now? (if not btw...that's fine...even if you continue to post tonight it's not like everyone always wants to get into that sort of discussion at all times so this is not a "call out" or anything like that you can simply say "not now" and no problems w/ me)

Most moderate people, leaning different direction...will agree w/ this. Koppel is on campaign as any O'Reilly viewer know to try and make his point against this....he isn't the first and won't be the last and he won't succeed.

Just to spark my memory (not being facetious here) you are libertarian man, correct?

hehe...well I rarely do not drink during the day then....there...you happy?

Out of curiosity what is the boot exactly? Obamacare? Small business tax for job creators paying the individual rate over $250K? Etc....

All is forgiven. I rarely PPP during the day. And I rarely do not drink at night. I apologize for neither, despite not being Mitt Romney.

You are talking with a man who calls this "Muslim culture on display." You are more foolish than him.

Dear Willard, Chinese manufacturing employees do not work on UI.

BillsFan the wealthy are not evil b/c they are wealthy...brother

Based on your perception of the state of the global economy and the events unfolding just prior to and as Obama took office, as well as the ongoings in Washington in recent years and the role the President plays with the economy, do you think Obama "failed" or has us moving in the right direction? That's the question. Instead of talking about debt and unemployment numbers generally Romney should point out specifics he would take the president would not as well specific policies he think failed and communicate that to the public. Obama will then defend his actions and present his view on Romney's future ideas as well as his own.

There should be a new rule in America...you are not allowed to complain about left wing media you think is stupid, if you consume right wing media that is also stupid

Good lord even the Cain Train himself trying to pile on... Herman Cain would have a "substantial lead" over President Barack Obama if Republicans had made him their nominee, according to Herman Cain, who spoke at the University of Florida on Thursday. From The Gainesville Sun: Cain told members of the media after the speech that Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney's recent "47 percent" comment was a "non-story" being blown out of proportion by the media. But Cain said he would have been doing better if he was the nominee, saying that he'd probably have a "substantial lead" on President Barack Obama at this point. "The reason is quite simple: I have some depth to my ideas," he said. Cain ran for the Republican nomination in 2011. He dropped out of the race in December and ultimately endorsed former House Speaker Newt Gingrich before Mitt Romney sealed the nomination. http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/herman-cain-says-substantial-lead-over-obama-135949668--election.html?_esi=1

22nd amendment is pure garbage. Hot stinking garbage.

I do not follow

There is no point to the 22nd amendment. None

dude penny loafers scream success...

Do you play poker?

I look at that and that's what I think also. No other logical conclusion.

Not in this lifetime amigo!

Yes. Eastwood is that !@#$ing good.

Are they poor b/c they're Republican or are they Republican b/c they're poor? Mull that one over...

Obama became President out of divine will. Our savior, sent from God, to relieve us of this trickle down oppression. Hale thy Obama....savior.