mrags
-
Posts
17,495 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by mrags
-
-
The only thing I know about this guy is the profile pic of his melon on Madden 2010 is absolutely huge. It takes up like half my screen when I click over him. Oh, and that hes a overall 77 FA and wants too much money for anyone to pick him up. Just saying, my Madden business sense tells me no, lol. In reality, we could use anyone at the T position, if he can be had cheaper then a 2nd id say pull the trigger. 3rd is the most Id offer. Unless they want Marshawn, Donte, or one of our scrub QB's.
-
This one is very tough. Im one of the 2 people so far that have opted for a game changing defensive lineman. Defense wins championships more often then offense IMO. Part of the reason why the Steelers have won 2 in the last few years, part of the reason why the Giants beat the Pats after an undefeated dream season of which their offense put up records, and part of the reason Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson have Super Bowl rings as starting quarterbacks. I do think that a HOF QB might be more important then a HOF DLmen, however if you have a QB you need to have at least a decent defense to stay in it. If you have a lights out defense you can win games even with a scrub at your QB. Hard decision, but either way, your probobly looking pretty good at a HOF DL, or QB.
-
I was a big Moulds fan but I think you are forgetting just how good Andre Reed was...he was one of the best run after catch receivers to ever play the game
+1
-
Depending on what else we pick up we are in major need of Tackles on this team. The one true starter at RT we had just retired. Bell is unknown. Im not saying Pace is the best option. But he IS an option that is most likely better then what we have. Like I said, it depends on what else we pick up via FA and the Draft.
-
Lee Evans is the most overpaid, and overrated player the Bills have ever had on their roster. He earns 9 Million/year and gives us little in return. He never shows up in big games, and never takes a leadership role. I would rather have 20 other recievers that would come at a cheaper price.
If the Bills could get 3rd, or two 4th round draft choices I would take it and run!
Does anyone share my sentiments?
I agree completely. Unfortunately you will be castrated on this board for saying it.
-
I have very close friends, and co-workers that have either lived in Denver for years, or grown up there, their entire lives and they all say that Denver winters are not even close to as bad as Buffalo's. The temp might be about the same, the snowfall is much heavier here and the amount of sun is heavier as well.
I dont know this to be fact, but like I said, these are friends of mine and people I trust.
With all that said, Im glad we didnt get Shanny. I want a coach that wants to be here and embraces WNY, its weather and fans. Gailey seems to have done 2 of the 3 so far. Lets see how much he likes the weather during games this year.
-
I don't get the bashing of Campbell. Every year in the league his stats have improved -- yards, TDs, completion percentage. Never threw more INTs than TDs. His average yds/attempt this year was a respectable 7.1 -- hardly "Captain Checkdown" numbers (Fitz was 6.3, Edwards 6.4). And he did this in an admitted "shitstorm" in DC, playing for different OCs every year. Great size and physical tools, and at 28 he's entering his prime. And he's durable.
I'd welcome Campbell to the Bills' roster.
I agree completely, Heres some stats to look at over the last 2 years.
Campbells stats from 08 and 09. The guy got better in every aspect of the game (except a few more ints) while even getting sacked more. Which tells me that his team and O'line got worse.
2008:
Attempts: 506
Completions: 315
%: 62.3
Yards: 3245
TD: 13
INT: 6
Yards per Attempt: 6.4
Yards per Completion: 10.3
Rating: 84.3
Sacked: 38
Lost Yards due to Sack: 266
2009:
Attempts: 507
Completions: 327
%: 64.5
Yards: 3618
TD: 20
INT: 15
Yards per Attempt: 7.1
Yards per Completion: 11.1
Rating: 86.4
Sacked: 43
Lost Yards due to Sack: 285
-
My favorite thing about situations like this is people automatically take it to about 15 levels beyond where it needs to go.
Jason Campbell for Whitner. It's not like we're trading a first round pick for the guy or signing him to a long term deal, we're just trading an expendable part of our roster for a guy who fills a need. This doesn't mean Jason Campbell is the QB here for the next 10 years, it just means he is probably better than what we have on our roster right now, and might buy the Bills at least one more year before they have to go draft a QB.
If it works out, great...we have our franchise QB. If it doesn't? What did we lose? We traded an overpaid, underperformaning player for a guy who is immediately the best QB on our roster.
Make the move.
Possibly the best post on this thread. It is what Ive been trying to nail into everyone's heads this whole time. Whitner gets the respect of the 1st round pick, but is (at the moment) a backup to Scott, Wilson and Byrd. I would honestly take all 3 over Donte. And we get a player in an area of need for the time being. We get to see if the kid actually has anything to play with. I dont so much as look at it as what Campbell is really worth, its more about the fact that I know Whitner is a waste of a roster spot on this team. He is overpaid for his performance on the field, and he opens his mouth far above his pay grade.
-
Thanks! Appreciate the reply...
Like I said, I am sure there are a few QB's to challenge the draft only theory and I think it's great that you took the time to research the stats! I am a little more "open" (not that I have the luxury of making the decision) to the idea of Jason Campbell based on the stats you furnished. I think Jim Kelly was approx. a 89% QB rating for his career and he probably had a couple years of growing pains as well before kicking into gear! So, Jason Campbell isn't way off I suppose. I read a post earlier that mentioned that he struggles with the long ball and to be honest I don't know if that is true or not. I don't see him play that often. Yes, We agree the Bills need a QB and even though it sounds as if the Bills want to keep Trent, I really am hoping that they don't! I just don't care for him as a QB period! Sometimes I like Fitzy, but he is inconsistent. I just don't have a pulse on B. Brohm, only heard that he has a difficult time with the knowledge of a NFL Playbook and his one performance wasn't good! I really think we need to get a FA QB and draft one (if they feel there is a worthy QB in the draft?). In that scenario, I would hope that they would start the FA, have Fitzy the initial backup, and the rookie 3rd string until he gets caught up on the playbook and adjusts to the speed of the NFL. Then sometime later in the season if the rook is doing well bump him up to #2 QB or starter if the Bills are lost in their season again. That's providing they have a solid L OT that can block the rush and not get the QB Killed! I don't know if that is a reasonable opinion...just how I'm looking at it right now. I'm mixed on Donovan McNabb! If the Eagles would even let him go! I know he would be better probably than anything in the QB junkyard that we currently have and suppose there is a GOOD arguement...lol....for picking up a younger FA like Jason Campbell ! I'm starting to warm up to it some...I'm definitely burnt out on Trent. Anyways, it's dinner time..Yeah, no biggee..it's hard to determine tone and serious intentions sometimes from just blogging your opinion and having some football fun disputing a point.. It's cool..sometimes a clash of ideas is great as I needed to get revved up a little for football talk as it is at it's most boring lull until the NFL Draft which I'm obsessed with! Yeah, the Combines just started up but I find it a little boring except for knowing who runs the fastest and who can lift the most reps. Go Bills!!!
See, Im not so hard to get along with as long as you agree that Im always right. LOL.
Have fun enjoying the Combine. Im sick so Ill be home all weekend doing the same. Go Bills.
-
Todd Collins has no problem picking up the system.
He doesn't have the physical attributes that Campbell has and he wasn't a first round pick but he clearly is the better QB.
When others are picking up the system faster than Campbell, I consider him slow.
Redskins fans are fed up with him...they stopped making excuses for him years ago.
JC actually regressed this year. Another excuse is his OL sucked and it did for this year. But he has played under various lines in different years and he has sucked in all of them.
I have watched all Bills and Redskins games for years they are my two teams I follow. (Bills will always be the favorite)
He may not have the physical tools but I would take Fitz over Campbell any day of the week...and Fitz is a bum.
Todd Collins has no trouble picking up the system? Then why didnt he win the job outright over Campbell the past 2 years?
He regressed this year? Hows that possible based on these stats:
2008:
Attempts: 506
Completions: 315
%: 62.3
Yards: 3245
TD: 13
INT: 6
Yards per Attempt: 6.4
Yards per Completion: 10.3
Rating: 84.3
Sacked: 38
Lost Yards due to Sack: 266
2009:
Attempts: 507
Completions: 327
%: 64.5
Yards: 3618
TD: 20
INT: 15
Yards per Attempt: 7.1
Yards per Completion: 11.1
Rating: 86.4
Sacked: 43
Lost Yards due to Sack: 285
To me it looks like the only basis of your argument is that he threw more interceptions. He has one more attempt in 09 then he did in 08 but had more completions, 7 more TD's, better yards per attempt, better yards per completions, a higher rating, sacked 5 more times and only gave up 19 more yards on sacks.
-
Lynch is gone. The way we will 'use him' is to trade him and get some additional draft picks to better this team.
Unfortunately you wont get much for Lynch after the season and offseason he had last year. He is one bad night away from being suspended for a full season and he didnt do anything on the field this year to warrant taking his starting job back. With quality veterans like LT, Westbrook, Taylor available in FA I dont think anyone would give up much in a trade for Lynch. The guys I just mentioned have proven to get it done on the field and off the field they are quality stand up guys.
-
This is being talked about on another thread.
-
They tried to get half a dozen QBs last year before settling back with Jason Campbell. If he is so great, why have they spent two years trying to replace him? Three words: Jason Campbell Sucks!
but...but...but...
Were talking about the mighty mighty Washington Redskins. Every available QB should want to play there and all teams should trade with them and give away their talented QB's for almost nothing.
-
Well stated. Campbell is not the QB of the future, but he is without a doubt an upgrade over what we have now. Furthermore, for all of those clamoring for Tyler Thigpen, Campbell is pretty similar. If Gailey can make Thigpen look good, then he can probably make Campbell look good. With an inept coaching staff and meddlesome owner in DC, it would be tough for any young QB to succeed. I think he has more talent hands down than Edwards or Fitz, and could thrive with the right coaching. If we can get him cheap enough, I say get him!
I like the point you made with Thigpen. IMO he is my first choice of the crap that is out there. There are no big name FA's this year and even if there were you would have to get them to want to come to the Bills anyway. The Draft is as much as a crapshoot as ever and with none of the "Star" QB's throwing at the Combine it shows a lot about them, IMO.
Thigpen is very talented and got a bad stick just like Campbell. Their teams made the Bills look good in the last few years. And we all know how bad we were. Just imagine being on a Chiefs team that goes 2-14 and try and look like a solid starter in the league. Most people would realize this.
-
Yes, I did think of that..and that is why I said " You trade-up if you feel there is a superior franchise QB in the draft" Obviously if there isn't a franchise QB in the draft you don't trade-up for one! Obviously, if there isn't one in the draft at all you wouldn't select one as well. Let's use some sense here, and my word isn't Gospel or anything. It's just a point that OVERALL it almost always plays out that a franchise QB is drafted and if they don't show potential in their first 3 or 4 years (and that's being gracious) as almost all the QB's I named were very good by their second or third year if not sooner! I don't really care who proved what! Bandit this or that..who cares? Campbell is not anywhere near an elite QB and never will be, even if that is hard for you to digest. We can look for excuses for Campbell and Edwards but They are both somewhere between poor and average and I tend to lean towards poor! As far as draft picks go..(did u even read my post?) Obviously not, and why do you come off as argumentative? This isn't my entire life and hopefully not yours either! It's fun, It's a sport, I like it! Anyways, I said that you would use your NEXT draft pick (Round 2 if that's not clear enough) and get the best L OT you can get to protect your QB! If the Bills gave up their 1st, 3rd, 6th, 7th to move up to Detroits spot for instance (If they felt confident that a superior franchise QB was in that spot)..why wouldn't you make the trade?? I am not saying there is one for sure available...That would be in the hands of the scouts/talent evaluators of the Bills! I'm just saying if the next Peyton Manning was available, that I would give up several draft picks...heck if I knew the Next Peyton Manning was available I'd give up those picks and I would feel like I stole him! Bledoe, Blesdoe! You got to be kidding!! He was good for 8 games...real good! and then he disappeared completely as a QB! He hit the wall...His best years was in N/Eng...It was drudgery watching Blesdoe's fall as well! That's not much of a comparison!! You sure got twisted and weird on me and I don't even know you dude/dudette! Anyways, I didn't just mention the players you regurgatated to me...I also mentioned T. Brady, Peyton Manning, P. Rivers, there's also D. Breeze and I mentioned there are others...If you want to be successful challenge my opinion then start naming QB's that had little to no success in the leaugue for 3 to 5 years, got traded to another team and led that team to a Super Bowl victory!!! Huh? Maybe there is one or two that have?? I don't know...If your going to dispute a point then you should back it up! That would be fine...I may not know as much as you? So fire away! Start naming those retread QB's like Campbell who will become a great QB, but had valid excuses during their first stint with their first team, but later became Superstars!! If not, then that is my point exactly!!
Why would we want Campbell???? More of the same to me! Seems like most bloggers are saying that as well!! So what exactly is your point besides trying to flip everything I post????????? That is my point you know...that the Colts and Patriots wouldn't get rid of their QB's at this point in their career....that is the point! That is why I am saying that Campbell
is expendible as M. Shananhan wants to try and identify his QB of the future for the Skins and Campbell in his opinion is not/and will not cut the mustard! So your backing Campbell for what reason? So we should just quit and not try to find the best QB available in the draft because you determined that none of them are capable? Well, If I were a teacher I would have you re-read my original post and have you draft up an outline for a constructive arguement, if you must be abrasive!
I do resent your comment about punching a baby in all seriousness, as I have a lovely 10 week old baby girl, whose eyes sparkle as she smiles at me and I could never imagine anyone ever being dispicable enough to bring harm to a innocent, little baby! Please stick to football if you have to respond so negatively to people's posts. Hope your nicer in real life than
you were in your reply. I'll pray for you!
QB's that were not successful for close to 3-5 years and were traded and became superstars. Lets name some of the more productive ones:
Steve Young: (played 2 years with Tampa and could barely make the field, and 4 years with SF before he did as well)
7 Pro Bowls
3x All Pro Team
3x SB Champ
2x SB MVP
2x NFL MVP
AP player of the year
2x Offensive player of the year
Highest QB rating
Record for most TD's in a Super Bowl
Hall of Fame Inductee
Drew Brees: (played first 3 years in San Diego with a 10-17 record as starter only broke 3,000 yards once in that time)
NFL Comback Player of the year (2004)
4 Pro Bowls
3x All Pro Team
Walter Payton Man of the year
3x NFC Offensive Player of the year
NFL Offensive Player of the year
Super Bowl Champ
Super Bowl MVP
Career QB Rating of 91.9
Kurt Warner: (couldnt even get on the field until an injury took Trent Green out for the season)
4 Pro Bowls
2x NFL MVP
3x All Pro Team
Super Bowl MVP
Super Bowl Champ
Walter Payton Man of the year
Bart Starr Man of the year
2 Different teams with 100+ TD's
Most passing yards in a single playoff campaign
Career QB Rating of 93.7
Oh yeah, he also had a stint in his career where he went 6 seasons with the Rams, Giants and Cards with a winning record of 13 and 29.
Theres 3 (Most Likely) Hall of Fame QB's that I just rattled off for you to ponder. Stats and awards were viewed on Pro-Football-Reference.com and Wikipedia. You and I both know there are plente of QB's in this league that dont get a real shot until they are 3+ years in this league. Not everyone starts out like Tom Brady, Payton Manning, Ben Rothlisberger. More start out like Aaron Rodgers where they cant make the field for 2 years.
We need a new QB. We both agree on that. I personally dont think there is any talent at QB in this draft that will become anything spectacular. But that is all up in the air and nobody will know that for sure for about 3-5 years anyway. But Campbell would be an upgrade over what we have.
Jason Campbell: (after 52 Games starting)
20 and 32
10,860 yards
55TD's
38INT's
Sacked 109 Times
82.3 Rating
And he has finished the last 2 years starting in every game
2 seasons with over 3,000 yards
Trent Edwards: (after 32 Starts)
13 and 16
5,498 yards
24TD's
25INT's
Sacked 58 Times
77.9 Rating
Has not completed a full season of football since he was a Junior in High School
0 seasons with over 3,000 yards
I personally dont think Campbell is the future of this organization. Maybe you were under the impression that was my intentions. He is a better QB then what we have had. We are in complete rebuilding mode and if there are no QB's available to us via FA or the draft we have to wait until one comes along. He is simply a stop-gap until that happens. We cannot expect any QB on this roster to start this season. It would be complete coaching suicide. There will be a new starter at the QB position in 2010. Would you rather it be Trent?
I will not apologize if you take my comments about a baby and punching yourself seriously.
Grats on your baby girl though.
-
Anyway, I see your points regarding Campbell. I'm not necessarily saying that I think he'd be the long-term solution at QB, but if he's burning a hole in Washington's roster and we could get him cheap, I'd be fine with him starting until a draft pick were ready to take over; because no matter what we do in trades/free agency, I believe this teams needs to draft a QB.
My point exactly Bandit. I completely agree with this. You of all people should know from all the arguing we did last year about our OL and QB that I was in favor of keeping what we had to see how it worked out. You were right and I was wrong on that. I thought they COULD be better then they were. My crow tastes better with hot sauce by the way. We need an upgrade at QB and Campbell, no matter how small, would be an upgrade. We know what we have on the roster now and it wont work moving forward. Whitner is burning a hole in our roster as much as Campbell is with the Skins. An even swap sounds good to me. Just saying. I cant believe anyone would say stick with Trent or Fitz over anything new. Its rediculous to me. Anyway, Good posts today.
-
Why would we even want to get him to begin with? Haven't we dealt with enough mediocre players long enough?? I don't want to bring in personnel of mediocre talent anymore! (Not implying that you have anything to do with all that)..Just a frustrated fan that believes he could make better personnel decisons than the Bills do! Haven't seen them do one thing I agree with except for letting go of John Guy since firing D. Jauron. I wish they would let Tom Modrak go as well, but unfortuantely I don't think the Bills's (Pardon the Pun) braintrust will do that! So we'll waiver between 4 and 8 wins over the next 5 years!
Here's the obvious:
1. The best teams build through the draft
2. The best teams have ownership that is committed to winning
3. The best teams ensure that they have the best General Managers and Scouting departments, including Coaches, Trainers, etc..
4. The best teams find the best Quarterbacks who are the Generals in the field! They don't settle for has been re-treads who are over the hill (except for Brett Favre). Look at the best of the best..They are normally drafted and stay with that franchise for many years! Joe Montana, Steve Young, Jim Kelly, John Elway, Dan Marino, Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Terry Bradshaw, Phil Simms, Rothlisberger, Ken Stabler, Warren Moon, etc...............You don't see your QB's who have IT bouncing around from team to team! You rarely get a QB in FA that amounts to anything!! So picking up Campbell or whomever isn't even worth the effort and to give up something for that right is even more damming to our future when it means surrendering draft picks!
You trade up if you believe a superior franchise QB is available to as high as you need to get that QB!! Surrender what you have to and select the best L OT you can when you pick next and probably pick up the best L OT available in FA as well to better your odds to fill a L OT starting role and protect your QB !!! I don't care if you have to draft 3 QB's and 3 OT's to find the starting QB & OT !! You do it and get rid of all the yuck yuck muck muck mediocre bullcrap that you currently have
at these two positions!!
Maybe the "superior franchise QB" isnt around in this draft. Did you ever think of that? To give up multiple picks to trade up for complete unknowns in the draft is just as silly. Bandit showed proof that Campbell produced more yards and TD's this past season than any Bills QB since weve had Blesdoe. He arguably had just as bad as a team and OL that the beloved Trance Checkwards and JP Loserman had but we give them excuses out the a-hole. The fact is there is not much better out there in FA or available for trade first of all, second fact is any FA available would have to be interested in coming here when the rest of the team is so horrible.
And to almost all the names you listed above, most of them played in a completely different time/era of football. You cannot compare Bradshaw, Kelly, Marino to athletes of today. Back then there wasnt a real free agency period or a salary cap. And any fool knows that the Pats and Colts could never get rid of Payton Manning or Tom Brady. They are bigger than the organization. It would be fan base suicide if you traded or cut either of them. Rothlisberger recently got a huge contract but I would expect he wont be a Steeler for ever. And if he is its justifiably so. The guy has won 2 super bowls already and hes not even in his 30's. Your ignorance of comparing the history of the NFL vs todays NFL makes me want to punch a baby in the face. Please log off your computer punch yourself.
-
See, there you go presenting facts while the rest of us are trying to bash a guy that may possibly end up playing for Buffalo.
I suppose the next thing you're going to do is compare him to a QB that virtually everyone on this board would trade for. Like maybe say that--in spite of all of those challenges (in which you didn't mention the fact that he was playing for a totally overmatched head coach)--he perfromed on par with a guy that just about everyone here would be jumping for joy if Buffalo acquired:
Campbell: 327/507 (64.5%), 31.7 Att/game, 3,618 yds, 7.1 YPA, 20 TD, 15 INT, 86.4 QB rating, 40 completions 20+ yds, 8 completions 40+ yds, 43 sacks
QB2: 339/513 (66.1%), 34.2 Att/game, 3,753 yds, 7.3 YPA, 26 TD, 14 INT, 93.2 QB rating, 42 completions 20+ yds, 3 completions 40+ yds, 24 sacks
Source:
http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?sea...mp;d-447263-n=1
Anyone got a guess as to QB2's identity? Scroll down for the answer...
Borderline Future HOF QB Kurt Warner
You are so on the money Bandit. When was the last time Buffalo had a 3,600 yard QB? Bledsoe? The TD's and INT's could use some work on Campbell but he is a solid QB. He would probably rank near 15th or better in the league if you ranked QB's this past year and as you and others have said here, he had absolutely no WR's, his TE was injured, his OL was just as bad or worst than ours, he was constantly reminded that he was not wanted on his team by his coaching staff and fans. His situation makes JP Losmans look like DisneyLand. He would be a huge upgrade over Trent or Fitz and might actually have a future with just the right amount of TLC. It would get rid of a useless waste at safety and we could focus more on the lines. This is a great deal IMO. Nothing more than Whitner and a 4th or 5th though.
-
He is too old, slow, and overweight to play as an OLB in a 3-4. Sure if he lost 20+lbs, and 3 years, and never had nagging injuries he might be a good fit. Its too late in the game for him to learn a new scheme and be productive. He would be a stopgap and thats about it.
If he was trying to get traded to a Texas team so he could be closer to his family, Id say good luck with that. Im sure every other team thinks the same about Schobel. Old, and slow.
-
-
Agreed. LT is soft too. NE can't count on him for the playoffs.
Yup, one year LT gave up in the playoffs, and another he was injured with the Chargers. Hes not even close to what he once was. Backups are better than he is. When RB's get the wear and tear on their bodies that LT has they decline fast. There arent many that play very long.
-
Ive thought this has been a very big possibility for a few weeks now. If TO and McNabb are friends again, and TO actually was serious when he said he would like to stay in Buffalo if all the right changes were made. Maybe he is lobbying to get McNabb here.
The other thought I have is this. Does this coaching staff even want TO? As far as anyone else knows, nobody else in the league wanted TO last year. What makes anyone think this new coaching staff does?
With all that said, This is our best shot at winning next year. Even if TO was interested in staying here, he wont if we go with the same QB scrubs weve had. If we pick up McNabb we answer our QB question for at least 2-3 years, and we keep TO. If we dont get McNabb, we have another hole to fill at WR along with OLB, ILB, DT, QB, WR, LT, RT. Thats just too much to overcome in 1 offseason.
-
Lynch is nothing but an overhyped punk. Another waste of a first round pick by the moronic regime.
+1
-
LT is done and he is done for a reason. He has had too many injuries and is WAY past his prime. Where would he fit in our rotation? Fred, Marshawn, LT....we don't have enough touches to go around for the guys we do have. It is only logical to assume it's another one of these guys that think player XYZ is a thug or whatever veiled "off color" name you want to use. It's typical.
Lynch without question has definitely had some maturity issues but he is a good RB who was in the probowl as an alternate 2 years ago. He had the highest yards per carry of all probowl RBs and was the guy called in when the AFC needed a critical 4th down conversion. We are never going to get better if we keep getting rid of talent because our poor little feelings got hurt because these players aren't perfect gentlemen or actually demand to be paid what they are worth.
I agree he is a risk due to his off field problems and that Fred is a better cut back runner and slightly better receiver. Is this because Fred Jackson is 29 and Lynch is 23? Something to think about people. Freddy better be more mature and more polished as a RB as he is more than 5 years Lynch's senior. That is 2/3s of a lifetime in RB years. That being said if we could actually find this guy a o-line that could open a freakin' hole in the running game he is indeed a BEAST!
Let's worry about fixing our actual holes instead of creating new ones shall we?
I do agree with your pointsa bout not going after LT, as well as your points about keeping talent as opposed to letting them walk. However I completely disagree with your take on Lynch. I do think he started to get looked at on the field because of his off the field issues. However, on the field he is far from a "good" RB. He has proven that he is an average RB at best. Even if you gave this guy a line he would find OL'men to run into. He is a power back, unfortunately he likes to dance around like he is more than a power back. He doesnt fit in what his role should be. The only reason I wouldnt cut him is because we still need a backup at some point. But I think hes worthless.
The Bills' Draft in 2010 should include...
in The Stadium Wall Archives
Posted
+1
I cant find an Icon that makes me laugh as hard as this and I dont want to be a jerk and type a page full of LOLOLOL......
Words cannot describe how I feel right now. LOL