Magox

I know we´ve made these sort of comparisons in the past, but do you remember how badly the Bush administration was criticized for Abu Ghraib (sp)? This is almost as bad, could you imagine the press and coverage this would receive if the Bush administration was still in place? and yes I would characterize this as horrific, you are talking about pissing on a dead body.

Ummm, the economy

OMG!

Yep, business as usual. Romney is gonna have to go against all these networks when the Obama machine turns their focus towards him, lucky for him FOX news will be on his side. Almost a wash

Unreal!

Whoever did it, I´m ok with it.

That´s it, he´s a proven winner. You cannot rationally argue with the facts, he was one of the best in the business when he was with Bain Capital, the incredible job he did with the Salt Lake city Olympics and his fiscal record in blue state Mass. Lets be real here, he is much more qualified to be president than the one who is in there now.

These lemmings dont see it that way. I am all for corporate lobbying as long as their is still lobbying for unions. Of course they don´t see how Union wages and benefits have placed states and local governments on the verge of bankrupcty and have indeed caused local and state taxes to go up virtually almost everywhere in the U.S causing us the taxpayers to foot the bill. No, but its ok, its always corporate greed that is at fault, never the ones they support. Conservatives are for the private sector, and libs for big government, of course I´m over generalizing but thats pretty much what it boils down to in regards to who our representatives are bought off from. So you get more corporate lobbying from the side of the conservatives and more union lobbying for the libs. If you want to get money out of politics, you do it across the board. No union or corporate lobbying. Also this notion of taking money out of politics is being corrupted because of Corporate money is ridiculous and hypocritical. Here are some more fun facts about money and politics. You can verify those numbers in a number of different sources, and it doesnt just go back to these past elections, it goes way back. So i don´t wanna hear you lemmings mention the influence of corporate money in politics without prefacing it with the even more disgusting amount of money that unions use, and in many cases against the will of their members, which makes it even more appalling.

It was actually intended to be an insult at the OP, because you know he doesn´t like black people, but your partisan instincts assumed I was defending Haley Barbour. You see Buftex, do you get it now? do you? Ok

Did I just read Baltimore say something about Conservatives allowing drug companies to make more money? Guess you must have been absent during the health insurance debate of 09/10 http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/03/22/us-usa-healthcare-industry-factbox-idUSTRE62K1IV20100322 Enough of the ¨Pious Bologna¨ the fact of the matter is in order for our ¨Agent of change promising of hope and transforming how Washington works high esteemed¨ president to get through his Awful health insurance bill, he cut a deal with the drugmakers to not oppose the bill and recieve advertising funds to fight FOR it. In exchange, they got all these benefits. If he really cared about lowering costs, he would of allowed Imported drugs to come from Canada, but he didnt. So enough of the bull ****.

I think you been reading too much Maureen Dowd But funny enough, that is how it will be portrayed

If the exit polls coming out of New Hampshire is a harbinger of things to come, then it bodes really well for Romney, considering that out of all the evangelicals, he won that group, even more so than Gingrich and Santorum. But when they see the Obama machine and surrogates come out with all their hollow attacks that fool all the suckers such as Lybob, PastaJoe, David N. etc, this will anger those evangelicals so much that they will go out to vote not so much because they like Romney, but because they hate everything Obama and the libs stand for. All Romney needs is a solid VP choice and he has this race locked up.

Take off your partisan glasses for a sec Buftex, I know you can do it. Come on, just give it a try. The fact is, I don´t give a shid about this topic, hence the yawn.

Of course, you totally missed the whole point of what I was saying. But thanks for playing youtube boy

I love it!

*yawn*

Try creating an original thought, it´s kinda cool, really.

Dante, you were asking what sort of people fall for this line of crap? Here you go, Pasta Joe, king of the lemmings.

The Tea Party definitely don´t like Mitt, but they hate Obama more than they dislike Mitt and that trumps everything.

I didn´t say it was ok, I said it was cheesy. In other words, without taste. And as to your last comment, Mitt will defend outsourcing? ok, if you wanna get ridiculous, then Obama will defend Socialism.

That´s ok, it´s the line of attack that I question. What sort of conservative criticizes one for effectively and successfully implementing the free market system? Firings have to happen in some circumstances, if you read the WSJ findings, most of the businesses they took over were on the verge of failing, and he turned most of those companies around. That´s what is in question here.

That ad by Romneys Pac was cheesy. But if you noticed, I stated that Romneys ¨firing¨ comment was a gaffe, simply because the optics allow it to be, even though it was taken out of context. But you are missing the whole point of my post, it wasn´t that they took what he said out of context it was the actual content of the attack In other words, what I´m saying is that they are attacking his capitalist credentials and tremendous success he had and painting him as some sort of ¨corporate raider¨ . That´s not what wise ¨conservatives¨ would do, it wreaks of desperation, and at the end of the day will hurt those ¨conservatives¨ that choose those line of attacks. Now for the liberal lemmings, you guys will eat that **** up, because thats your type of red meat, much like abolishing EPA, education system is fodder for the right.

Hell No! Newt is too easy to pick apart, just like Sarah but only different. 1) Marco Rubio 2) Jeb Bush (never gonna happen) 3) Chris Christie 4) Susana Martinez 5) Nikki Haley Thats who his choices should be in that order Anyone one of those five, he most likely wins with over 60% chance at winning Of course it is. Lemmings are plentiful. It´s gonna be about who gets their message out more effectively. Havent you heard how these occupy morons interrupt these GOP stump stops parroting what the DNC or other political ads spew? same ****. So yeah, its gonna be a messaging war, and the only shot Obama has in winning this election is by going negative, he has very very little to run on that is positive. So its gonna get ugly, if Romney doesn´t do a good enough job of winning the message war, he´ll be caste as a much worse villain than Bush ever was. It wasn´t Sarah who endorsed him it was her husband Todd.

Obama is moving back more to the left, they realized that his shift to the middle since the midterms of 2010 didn´t move the needle whatsover with independents, so their strategy is simple. Shore up the kooky left with the move to the left and spend a record amount of money on negative ads against Mit Romney in the general elections and paint him as the greedy, ¨callous, insensitive¨ Wall street dude and hope that, that gains enough traction to win just enough independents to win the general election.

This will be the number one attack issue, independents wont give two ***** about romneycare, it will all be about the occupy wallstreet theme of greed, and Romney is the perfect villain for that role. So as Romney says, this will be a battle for America´s soul, capitalism vs democratic social justice policies. It will be up to Romney to explain to the independents that capitalism in its entirety is a net plus for our economy and that Obama has failed miserably when it comes to reviving the economy. I don´t care how you slice it and dice it, if the workforce was the same size that it was in 2008, the unemployment rate today would be at 10.9% And that is a failure.