Magox

At first, I thought it was an attempted sleight at his supporters but after reading the article the tone wasn't derogatory it was simply putting the pieces of the puzzle together. The findings of what the writer of the article makes a lot of sense, republican voters that are at most risk of having to compete for jobs with illegal immigrants are the ones that support Trump. There was absolutely nothing wrong with the article.

You're a nut if you think Trump or Sanders would be better at the helm than Clinton or Bush.

She can't and she won't. She's beholden to her fringe base much like many of the GOP candidates are beholden to theirs. You can't say ALL LIVES matter without being labeled insensitive and not acceptable. You gotta be against the Key Stone pipeline because that's what the crazy Green's want even though the president's own review of it gave it the ok. You can't go against killing a baby after 20 weeks in the womb because the crazy uber feminists think that a woman can exterminate that baby simply because it is an inconvenience and it's her choice.

This is what I have a hard time seeing how in the world can one justifiably defend killing a baby after 20 weeks. You should know by the damn 20th !@#$ing week if you want to have the abortion. Even if it's rape or incest, get the damn abortion ASAP, don't !@#$ing wait 20 weeks to do it. The last election cycle Planned Parenthood and Obama had the GOP on their heels because of those moron's Aiken and Murdoch. This is a winning issue, no one is saying you can't have an abortion, just do it before they are nearly completely developed. **** man, even studies published in the New England Journal of Medicine state that babies CAN survive outside of the womb around this time period. Give the baby a chance. This issue really gets to me, I don't see how anyone can justifiably want to have an abortion this late in the game. Look it's a damn baby.

The latest in PC

I read what cowherd said three times, he wasn't speaking to their intellegence but their academic acumen. This is PC gone wild.

He must have not had his conservative goggles on that day.

With all the great press towards police officers and the constant praising I'm guessing there are lots of people who want to become Police Officers. Recruiting must be fantastic! So much video feed, everyone now a days is their own director and producer via their cell phone, heck if I was a police officer I'd just put myself out there in a position to become a star in one of these youtube features. What could go wrong? Crime most certainly is going to come down because of all of this.

I don't have a problem with subsidizing lower income folks so that they can obtain coverage, but as I had noted ad nauseam a few years back regarding the healthcare law and how it was crafted, the way it is written encourages older and sicker people to enroll through their pricing structure however gives huge disincentives for younger healthier folks to obtain coverage. You need the younger and healthier people to enroll at higher numbers to keep premiums in check so that the risk pools are more evenly balanced. Their whole pricing scheme in order to achieve this is so convoluted and illogical specially when you factor in their paternalistic mandates that the government places on the carriers in the additional 'essential benefits' that for many people are wholly unnecessary i.e, maternity, substance abuse, pediatric and rehabilitative coverage. They didn't think this through too well.

If it was mentioned earlier, my apologies. Clinton email scandal could prompt criminal probe

And it wasn't some typical dumb ass chick that is a peon within their organization, it was both the president of their medical director's council and their senior medical officer. We've seen Planned Parenthood's ads, definitely uber feminism is what dominates that organization and the attitudes of these two high ranking officials I think says a lot in regards to the attitude of how they view things.

At worst there was criminal activity involved, at best the culture that prevails at Planned Parenthood is crass and lacks sensitivity when it comes to babies that are in mother's wombs.

VeryWide Right is a troll account. He is a liberal.

Tgregg is absolutely correct, the Democrats are completely gleeful every time Trump's name is mentioned. This has been the biggest gift they could have asked for, rather than the focus on Hillary's crappy poll numbers and how no one trusts her and how she is having troubles vs. Bernie, the focus has been on the Trump Clown show. There is LITERALLY NO DEMOCRAT that is worried about Trump. Not a one!

It's been posted already.

Funny you mention that, there was an article written by a GOP consultant in Politico yesterday from Rick Wilson, it was quite condescending and he referred to what you were talking about as “herpes and a hangover”

My father had the exact same observation regarding Romney on the those two other debates. Well, hopefully Trump doesn't run as a third party candidate, the saving grace could be his financial bottom line. Despite his bluster about his net worth, his income has taken a little bit of a hit with all the boycotts etc. Not only will have the Latino's written him off, which has hurt his commercial brand if he ruins the chances of the GOP, there will be some wealthy elite GOP donors who won't do business with him either.

I think people forget that the GOP have won three out of the last five presidencies and would have won at least another if Bush sr. vs Clinton if Perot hadn't run. So it's a myth to believe that they keep losing elections, it's simply not supported by the facts. When was the last time the D's won back to back presidencies? I have no problems with candidates running "aggressive" campaigns, but purposely lying about a race to gin up voters is not the way to do it. Why do you think that an overwhelming portion of the country views him as a clown? We aren't talking about a slight majority we are talking about 2/3 of the entire country who see him for what he is.

Have you not seen how thin-skinned he is? Can you imagine him losing and how he'd react? Here is another tidbit from him crying foul. So it's "unfair" that the interviewer reads to him the results of the poll, which is that there are many more people who see him as the clown he is than people who like him? What is he trying to leverage here? CNN better stop or else...... Could you imagine him in a campaign being ripped over and over by either the Democratic or Republican nominee about all the wacky things he has said or the liberal positions that he has had (like support for higher taxes and single payer). The guy isn't tough enough to withstand the withering criticism that presidential candidates have to endure. Oh, and btw, if he were to run as a third candidate, not only would Hillary be the next president, but the GOP would lose every single swing district house race and senate seat. The house and Senate would both flip to the Democrats simply because there are enough knuckle draggers who would buy into his snakeoil to take away votes from the GOP. Let's see what happens.

Na, he's just a thin-skinned wuss that believes he is being treated unfairly. Congrats for being yet another fool who bought his snakeoil.

Waaaa! If they aren't "fair" I'll take my ball and go home. Since when is politics ever "fair"? For being such a straight talking tough guy, he sure can be a lil pu$$y.

Of course that wouldn't happen, having said that he does support a 90% top tax rate on the wealthy, single payer healthcare and free education for everyone. Growth would go way down, companies would move their businesses somewhere else, tax revenues would go down and the federal budget would explode. Of course, he wouldn't be able to get any of this passed through congress, but assuming they were all Californian's, his agenda would put the country in shambles in short order.

It use to be the conservatives that fall in line, now-a-days it's the opposite.

With people feeling comfortable in the confines of their echo chamber du jour, we have a hyper polarized political environment where the extreme's of each party dominate the debates within their own parties. Sure, the more moderate tempered candidates are the ones that are usually nominated but none the less, each party is moving further and further away from the middle.