All_Pro_Bills

Maybe we start to hear it as soon as this morning, but I expect the same set of characters that insist that a private company can do whatever they want to insist the DOJ or some other regulatory agency "block" this takeover offer. Citing "public interest" in blocking the deal. Watch for most of the clowns in Congress and the administration that insist on censorship to be the most vocal as they attempt to bend light to support their argument that freedom is bad. In reality this arrangement was never a private company doing as they please but rather government outsourcing censorship powers to private business in order to avoid constitutional limitations and public oversight. Twitter takes their marching orders from activists inside and connected to the US government embedded in the government not to serve the people but to serve the party. We all know the fact checker set up is a complete farce. If the deal does go through don't expect it to be before the November mid-terms. I also wonder if Musk envisions himself being involved day-to-day? My guess is he'll do something like ask Joe Rogan to run the outfit. At that point you won't need Space-X to launch liberals into orbit and unhinged and agonizing protest.

Is Musk a "free speech absolutist"? My answer to Reich (I must point out an appropriate name for somebody advocating censorship) is probably not. But Musk is a lot closer to that than Reich who holds a view that free speech is a threat.

Or not enforce them and therefore ignoring the law of the land and failing to execute the duties of the office. I'm guessing some would conclude that is an impeachable offense if a certain President was still in office.

The outrage is being held down by large piles of cash filling the pockets of the hypocrites that rule the Hollywood collective.

There is one main rule defining the uni polar world order. The US government makes the rules and everyone else goes along with them, or else and when we decide to change the rules, the rules will change. Everyone must adjust to those changes, or else. 1) Don't follow the rules and the US government has no problem with deploying the State Department, or the Treasury department, or the Pentagon, or the intelligence services to interfere your affairs, or elections, and will seek to destabilize and replace your leaders with more compliant political figures that will follow the rules and this applies to any country regardless of their political system. 2) Follow the rules and you will be left alone as it doesn't matter what form of government you rule under including undemocratic dictatorships and royal kingdoms.

Let me say my intent was not to dishonor the soldier in the field or their standard of conduct. I'm talking leadership. And you can call it what you want but considering how many wars our country engages in vs. the rest of the world (all for good intentions of course) our government's belief in its moral and ethical superiority is always the excuse for a lack of accountability.

Their playbook is so transparent that we just know the Dem's will be hatching some scheme going into election season. Given the polling numbers its obvious they're in trouble and holding Congress is at risk. It might be some vaguely worded and fact deficient "assessment" from the intelligence community that Putin poses a critical but undisclosed risk to "democracy" and the security of the election. And of course no details or facts can be revealed because that would put methods and procedures and people's lives at risk. The usual excuse to conceal lies and avoid open discourse. And of course if the Republicans gain control of Congress questioning the legitimacy of the election result because of interference and the second coming of "the resistance". And absolute certainty: blame Trump!

We have a few problems when it comes to oil. I'm talking about the human race and not just America as we're all in this together. The first one is simple. Annual production exceeds annual discovery of new reserves. The problem is depletion of a finite resource. This has been going on for decades and its interesting that the discovery of large fields peaked in the 1960's. Newer discoveries are generally smaller deposits in more remote areas which higher overall costs. This means energy in vs. energy out ratios are trending towards break even. Over time cheap and easy to find has transitioned to more expensive and harder to extract and get to market. This is a one time endowment of energy that took 75+ million years to form and will only take about 225 years to use up. Prices are going to rise. That doesn't take Biden off the hook for some short-sighted actions. Working without a plan and strategy, something both parties in Washington are good at. Like cancelling Keystone. And while environmentalists have the right idea that oil use is resulting in greenhouse gas emissions they're misguided to believe their solutions will result in some uninterrupted or even an equivalent level of prosperity and living standards. That leads to the second problem. Solar and wind energy generation just don't stack up to the energy output produced by oil and gas. While the Sun produces more energy in a couple seconds than we require to run civilization for a year our technology is just too primitive and inefficient to get the job done as it stands now. My conclusion is you can't support 7 1/2 billion human lives with solar and wind. That's the Elephant in the room nobody talks about. And my suspicion is part of the global elites plan is to eliminate in one way or another a substantial percentage of the population over time to make things more comfortable and suitable to their liking. To stretch out the supply so they can continue to operate their gas heated private compounds, jet-fueled private aircraft, and diesel fired yachts. That's the New World Order they now openly mention but just gloss over the silly details. Their plan doesn't differentiate between whether your a liberal or conservative or any other social or political slice or distinction you want to make. So why are we fighting amongst ourselves?

Some of the posters here act like Russia is the first country to ever violate the ethics and moral standards of modern warfare. While it sure looks like they're guilty of it they're not the first. And people living in a country that initiates discretionary and optional warfare in multiple places around the world which results in a lot of death and suffering shouldn't be throwing stones at glass houses. Do I think Putin should be held accountable? Absolutely. And so should the king of drone strikes Obama. How many civilians died as a result of his orders? How many wedding parties got hit over the border in Pakistan? Illegal attacks on Pakistan per international law. And Bush for something like 400K civilian deaths in Iraq. Who by some wild stretch is now a hero of the left for denouncing Trump and all these killings are forgiven. And those 10 civilians killed in Afghanistan in retaliation for the airport attack that Biden ordered and pronounced a success. All innocent men, women, and childred. Remind me who was held accountable for those civilian killings. Just an honest mistake, right? The bottom line is war sucks.

Yes because the laptop provides real and factual evidence of corruption and payoffs and likely implicating and compromising the President while all the 1/6 "evidence" that Trump sought to overturn the election thru some illegal action is just bullsheet made up for and by Trump-obsessed people like you that believe bullsheet.

Rumor has it that Obama showed up at the White House this week because he was tired of working from home.

Looks like you and Putin have a lot in common when it comes to advocating the use of State power to frame political enemies. You must be very disappointed with this verdict.

51 former officials inside the US intelligence community signed a letter expressing their conclusion the Hunter Biden laptop was a Russian dis-information campaign. Even the NYT and WaPo have agreed it is authentic. Do you think the former intelligence officials are lying or incompetent?

So you support a racist system trying to profile an African American male?

I'm just still wondering how you can hold confirmation hearings and vote through somebody for a court position that isn't vacant? From a procedure perspective, shouldn't they wait until there is an actually vacancy? I mean, if the slot doesn't need to be vacant at the time of the hearings then why not vote through 8 more Supreme Court justices-in-waiting and stack them up to fill the openings when the become available in maybe a year or two?

My base assumption when assessing unverifiable "information" originating with intelligence agencies wherever and whomever they work for is they are lying. And why wouldn't they? Lying is a basic skill requirement defined in the job description.

Let's face it. At this point given 16 months of almost nothing, nobody can actually be stupid enough to believe these conspiracies about 1/6. Believers in it are just good liars. Proponents of all these insurrection conspiracies know they're all bull crap but don't care. All that matters is the result, not the means or methods or the truth. Like Captain Ahab getting his whale the far-left is going to get Trump whatever the cost and whatever it might take. So maybe another question for anyone genuinely interested in truth and reality is why does anyone continue to believe in these manufactured conspiracies generated by the same group of people when one after another they're failed to deliver any indictable evidence or charges and have proven to be false? Maybe its time to consider the motivations of the accusers rather than the accursed and do some critical thinking about the nefarious objectives of the political actors not named Trump at work here? Of course my thoughts will likely be met with lots of tweet quotes and check lists of transgressions generated by various 1/6 conspiracy believers when all that really matters is evidence, charges, indictments, trials, convictions, and sentencing of the guy in charge. If you can't produce any of that you've got nothin'. End of story.

Oil prices have been in a steady rise since Biden took office. His first action was to cancel Keystone. If he didn't that pipeline would be in production today and the price shock to crude would have been much less to perhaps nothing. And also to align with activists pressuring banks to withdraw or withhold capital from the oil & gas exploration and development sector. Then informing the industry their services will no longer be needed in the near future. Who would invest given those conditions? Now Congress is doing their standard "not my fault" grilling of industry executives. Its a real hoot. If the administration was more focused on long term strategic planning, like our enemies are, instead of appeasing the fringe left we wouldn't be in the current mess. My advice is to build more solar panels and pray for sunny days.

Nobody likes Putin. The specific poll is just a reflection of how much Biden sucks ass, period. Is that too difficult to comprehend?

Who's crying besides you? In November the voters will wash the scum down the drain and all there's left now is to see how much more damage these clowns can do until the mid-terms. In the meantime, we're all going to suffer one way or the other.

Yes, Biden is acting like a dictator assisted by a cadre of political and corporate elites aided by a state security network used to monitor citizens and punish political opposition that combined form a threat to our democracy. Finally we agree on something.

So what's the real lesson here? This Trump supporter is an idiot or Biden is such a terrible and ineffective President that some would rather have a ruthless dictator?

Unchecked? So I assume you didn't notice the hostile press and a Federal bureaucracy and intelligence community intent on sabotaging the administration from day one along with the generation of various imaginary plots and conspiracies?

The only scenario worse than Biden continuing his best actor role as President would be Harris taking over the job. If that happens expect all Hell to break loose on all fronts.

This clearly calls for an independent counsel with the President unambiguously recusing himself from any involvement. When pigs fly, right?