GaryPinC
-
Posts
2,419 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by GaryPinC
-
-
Been to museums in Cleveland, NYC, Pittsburgh, Chicago and small ones out west so this one's gonna sound weird but the best family museum I've ever gone to is the Grand Rapids Public Museum. If you're ever stuck around Grand Rapids, I highly recommend it.
They do an amazing job with their displays with a wide variety of items gathered from history and donors around that side of the state. Art, fashion, paleontology, games, natural history, engineering history, war history. It focuses on Western Michigan but has worldwide items donated by wealthy in the area.
They recreated an entire street from the 1890's with all the shops that you walk into to see the appropriate artifacts. Aquarium tank with several young sturgeon from the Grand River. A large finnback whale skeleton a local Dr. had bought in Florida and displayed in his front yard for a year before donating to the museum.😂
Interesting collection that keeps you from getting bored for 2-3 hours.
-
29 minutes ago, RunTheBall said:
Does no one see the irony of the members of fan base called Bills “MAFIA” being triggered by a frog hanging from a rope?
Selective outrage.
The frog is not being lynched. There’s no rope around his neck. It’s suspended by as rope on a stick. I can see how those who want to be offended can find fault in this though. I just think the whole thing (both the “hanging” and the response to it) is dumb.
And Mahomes absolutely sounds like Kermit
Yes, everyone knows Mahomes sounds like Kermit. The added hair and jersey seem to indicate that also. It's a different kind of disturbing to pretend that this isn't a hanging of Mahomes as a joke.
I'm not saying it's racism. But it is symbolic of the lynchings and systemic racism in the south and offensive to at least some members of the black community. I know because I've discussed with some of my friends/acquaintances.
It's disappointing and it would be nice if these Mafia members had more class to find a different way to get this joke across.
-
1
-
1
-
-
8 hours ago, Magox said:
I know he's not a Bills player any longer but this was one of the reasons why I liked him as a player.
I appreciate his passion for trying to make the play but I prefer my punter to act as safety. He's just asking to get lit up charging into all those personnel. Sooner or later a ST coach will notice this on film and assign someone to make sure he does.
-
1
-
1
-
-
41 minutes ago, Niagara Bill said:
Bernard's interception in the last minute or so was, to me, one of the most incredible defensive plays I can recall. Yes he maybe a little under sized, a little injury prone maybe. But few people in NFL history could react and close that fast and make that play.
In my mind, equal to Josh's great play that few QB can make.
He is a pleasure to cheer for.
I posted it after the game, but I feel that Bernard's intelligent enough he goaded Mahomes into making that throw. Kelce is his security blanket over the middle, especially late in games, everyone knows it. Stay far enough off him to make it look like an open window but keep a good angle and slam it shut once the ball is in the air.
-
2
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, DapperCam said:
- Benford, yes.
- Bernard I’m a little bit hesitant on because he’s always injured. I wouldn’t break the bank on him, and might let him test the market and then circle back on a deal. He is a great player in our scheme when he’s out there.- Shakir I like a lot, but I wouldn’t pay him WR1 or high end WR2 money. I’m afraid some team will overpay him. Josh Allen has gotten so many dudes paid.
They're all playmakers so I say definitely yes despite Benford injury concerns.
-
23 minutes ago, Coach Tuesday said:
See I come at this differently. I know it’s normally the reverse but Sunday was a game where I would’ve started with Ray Davis or Ty Johnson to batter down and tire out the front seven a bit and then I would’ve switched up to Cook. Again the tendency is usually the opposite, get the defense tired from chasing and then hit them with the power back - but with the Chiefs I’d have done it in reverse.With Ty getting at least 30-40% of those runs. He hits heavy and in a hurry.
-
2
-
-
20 minutes ago, ToGoGo said:
I think everyone likes him, but the narratives on him have been so bad the last 7 years that they’re hesitant to openly say he’s awesome.
A Super Bowl win would be enough for people to admit it.
This year, he's finally a complete quarterback. That's the only complaint talking heads could preach on him, that he was trying the dumb hero throws too much instead of the open shorter routes.
But other teams' fans all know how good the guy is and how fun it is to watch him play. For years now. If they can't openly say he's awesome it's because they're jealous we have him. All my non-Bills fan friends sure are.
-
2
-
-
20 hours ago, Ethan in Cleveland said:
Make no mistake about it, that was Allen and Torrence making a play. Spy makes no sense on fourth and 2. Give credit to McDermott for not kicking the FG there. He's learned his lesson. The only thing that stops Reid and Mahomes is Allen having the ball. Like Rex said, Allen has never lost to the Chiefs.
People were talking that this game was almost meaningless, McD admitting the Chiefs are too good to kick the late field goal followed by staying aggressive on defense the last drive blows that perception out of the water. Now his players have lived it and that confidence has been created for next time. Let's hope he applies it to all the playoff teams past the first round. Continuous improvement McD, well done.
-
2
-
-
3 minutes ago, K D said:
The gameplan yesterday - Run up the middle for 1 yard, throw short screen to the sidelines for 1 yard, Josh has to make a superhero play on 3rd and long. It lacked any creativity and it's not a sustainable model for success. We won, sure, but Josh had to literally make the best play in the NFL this year for that to happen.
Would have liked to see some play action off that 1st down run or end around to the motion man, or everyone go one way and throw screen back the other way. Something creative. Or more Cooper down the field and Shakir over the middle. But we won so feel free to down vote this.
I agree with you about play action, I would also counter that all the boring plays are needed to set up the exotic in a game like this.
This was always going to be a tough, grind it out game against a great defense and so as tough as it is to watch, it set up things like the second half flats pass to Shakir for a first down, TD pass to Samuel, and of course Josh's run. They had that 4th down perfectly defensed as they had seen the look a lot!😂
Lulling the defense to a bored state of mind so you can exploit a variation when needed for a big play. Running down the clock with the lead. I think this was purposeful, and especially because we held the lead. And it truly gives me hope for a Superbowl because it's next level stuff this year.
-
7 hours ago, Special K said:
The Bills would have won last years playoff game if their Defense was at full health.
Mahomes did not look like his usual self, Kelce was basically invisible, and it was due to players that were out or playing hurt in that playoff game.
Not so easy for Kelce to get whatever he wants when AJ Klein isn't guarding him!!
Lets hope the D stays healthy for the rematch in this years playoffs!!
Go Bills!!!!!!!
You're going too far with the irrefutable, but not having Bernard, losing Benford, and Von being limited goes beyond their injuries. All three are playmakers, excelling when the moments are the largest with game changing plays. Next man up, yes, but you can't replace losing that big-time factor.
-
2 minutes ago, Magox said:
I was just telling my brother that I’m really going to miss Josh Allen when he retires. The amount of joy and satisfaction he has added to me is immeasurable. It’s not just the winning which there has been lots of it over the past 5 years but the insane talent he out of this world plays he makes that very few if any can make.
I know the Bills haven’t won the big one yet but I’m going to savor this victory because it was special.
Reminds me of watching the Bills' K gun during the 90's. Just breathtaking watching it click.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
What do you bet Bernard goaded Mahomes into that pass. Stayed off Kelce just enough but kept a good angle between Mahomes and Kelce?
-
7
-
2
-
1
-
-
13 hours ago, Doc Brown said:
I'm not even sure if McDermott realized it until he took that timeout. WTF was he doing?
Thank you for noticing all that, this is exactly my point with McD.
He's gotten us this far, but is he doing everything he can to get us over the playoff hump?
Sure it's only a handful of snaps but the troubling aspect is his mentality and lack of emphasis on finding these guys max number of snaps.
Set aside the debate of whether or not Elam and Bishop could replace the current starters. They appear to be the first option off the bench if a safety or boundary corner gets injured. What if the injury occurs in the playoffs? Will these guys be as ready as they can be?
We know our future, it's certainly true that you get there by focusing one game at a time, but McD is the one leader who has to concurrently tweak and plan for this future now. And for me he appears a bit lacking.
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, GunnerBill said:
I don't care about Basketball so all that is lost on me. They actually didn't hand TB the job in camp. He battled Tyrel Dodson for is and they were hoping one emerged. Bernard won a pretty uninspiring competition and started. It's fair to assume had it gone badly they'd have flipped to Dodson quickly. They didn't have to. Bernard earned the right to stay on the field. That's always how it works.
As for Beane giving McDermott a warning... this shouldn't need repeating again but Beane is NOT McDermott's boss. He has zero power to warn McDermott of anything. They both report independently to Terry Pegula.
Tyrel Dodson is JAG who was here since 2019. For the FO to not draft and act the way they did, they knew how the formality "competition" would go.
Bernard earned it the year before and McD chose to sit on him for whatever reason. I watched his first start and despite the mistakes it was completely obvious why the FO had faith in him; his intelligence, aggressiveness and playmaking ability quickly popped. He was the revelation Dodson or even Edmunds was never going to be.
You're right about the command structure, thanks for pointing it out and my apologies. Imagine McD getting a warning any way you want. Not sure if it happened but if not it needs to happen:
-McDermott is in his eighth season, Allen his seventh. Culture is firmly established.
-We haven't sniffed the super bowl since 13 seconds, a disaster that McD with his two timeouts to set the D, has never been fully accountable for.
-Our defense is stagnant and a major part of what results in our playoff losses. Our D line has never been a dominant force when we need it.
-It doesn't seem like the defense is any better this year, perhaps it's regressed a bit.
Change is needed. I would like to see McDermott himself change and tweak things to be more successful, do better to give every chance for playmakers to get on the field ASAP rather than next year. Is his system really maximizing the talent we have? I'm obviously not very confident it is.
If we can't move forward out of stagnation this year, then it's time for a new voice, leadership and direction. McD has done a phenomenal job establishing this team but has stalled out like his defense.
-
1
-
4
-
-
16 hours ago, machine gun kelly said:
Why rush it with Bishop?
Because for the playoffs, we really need a safety who can anticipate and close on the ball quicker than Hamlin. It's going to be a problem. It already is, it's just less obvious with winning. I understand the coaches if Bishop is making zero forward progress in practice, but if he is progressing they need to do everything in their power to help accelerate it. I'm also not suggesting he gets shoved into a starting role at this point.
-
1
-
-
18 hours ago, GunnerBill said:
Of course I think players can get better. What a nonsense thing to say. Bishop gave up both touchdowns against Houston he hit the wrong gap for the rushing touchdown and the guy sauntered right through the hole where Bishop should have been. As for playing him a series or two where we have a comfortable lead.... I mean that is what we have done. He got a series late against the Titans. He played late in games earlier in the year against Jacksonville and Baltimore when games were done.
Otherwise the ask is to take a player off the field who is avoiding making back breaking mistakes to put one in who is.
And your argument is actually hurt by your Bernard example. In 2022 he was bad when he played. He didn't then play again and "learn from his mistakes" while getting beat on the field. The Bills worked with him in practice and in the classroom and when he got his shot again in 2023 he earned the right to stay on the field with his play.
The NFL is too hard to have guys out there who are not ready mentally to play in the league. Other teams (even the bad ones) are too clever and well coached and will just spot your weakness and go at it relentlessly. We shouldn't need more proof. The Texans did it with Cole and the week before the Ravens attacked our 2nd level - Spector, Williams, Lewis and Morrow - in the absence of Bernard and Taron with all but one play on offense in that first half on the way to a big lead. When NFL teams know you have a weak spot they go after it.
I wanted Cole starting by now. I want him on the field. But he is going to have go some to earn back the trust he lost in Houston. It isn't just with the coaches either. If the other players see a teammate benched for a high draft pick even when that guy is hurting the team they soon let you know about it.
I don't agree that TB hurts my case, because he didn't have to earn it in 2023. He earned it in 2022, they made a point in the off-season of saying Edmunds' replacement was already on the roster so drafting one was not a priority. We don't know at what point in 2022 the coaches decided TB was ready only that they didn't act on it until 2023.
I agree with you on the rest, I just feel the coaches need to more prioritize getting him minutes. Not starting, just finding him more minutes to accelerate his development.
Bottom line is to this point we are wasting Josh's career and our window. McD needs to tweak his "process" to take that next step in the playoffs.
Best analogous example I can think of is the Cleveland Cavaliers and specifically their last game against the Nets. Their old coach Bickerstaff was a rigid process guy, not a lot of player development and limited success in the playoffs.
The change in player development under new coach Atkinson is an explosion. Multiple players are trying and doing things on the court they seldom did before.
Against the Nets, their 2 bigs starting lineup just wasn't working, Atkinson recognized it and went to a 4 guard lineup to seize and close out the game. Bickerstaff would have stuck with his starters and lost the game.
I'd like to see McD transition from Bickerstaff to Atkinson. I do wonder if Beane's given him warning because in pressors he face seems more sullen and stressed than in years past. We'll see.
-
1
-
-
7 hours ago, GunnerBill said:
We got much worse, like game losing level, play when they started Bishop. If he'd been just a bit of position in that game that would be one thing. He made the critical mistakes that led to two touchdowns. It's okay saying "get him experience and take your lumps now" but what if he costs you another game? Then what? A third game? At what point do you say you just have to play the guys who have been better to this point. If Bishop had played well at Houston he'd have got more reps. He played really poorly, he rides the pine. It's a meritocracy. And be clear I am no fan of the guys that are starting. I think they are the worst starting safety tandem in terms of talent level in the entire NFL. Bishop is more talented but when he got a shot on the field it went really, really badly.
Shakir played a 3rd of the snaps on offense as a 5th round rookie. People talk as though he wae never out there. The lack of production was because he couldn't run routes and kept overrunning the soft spots in zone which was understandable because he came from a gimmicky college offense that never asked him to do those things.
Is there an argument they should have committed to him as a peice of their offense ealier in year 2? Yea I think there is. They were trying to force feed the 12 personnel under Dorsey and I think that limited Shakir a but from breaking out sooner.
Bishop got caught looking on the long TD, I didn't see what happened on the other one. But to your points about him costing us more games, what if he does something many here including you think unheard of and learns from his mistakes? What if he cuts way down on his mistakes next game? What if McD instead plugs him in for a series or two in games when we have a comfortable lead?
Every NFL player has to adjust to the speed of the game, secondary is particularly rough but it has to happen in a game. Practice can't simulate it.
For those that say coach will put him in when he shows ready in practice, it didn't happen that way for Terrel Bernard so I don't trust the coaches. TB did get in early 2022 but of course made mistakes and was never seen again that year. Yet when Edmunds left they knew TB was the answer so much so they didn't draft anybody. That implies to me he earned it in practice but the coaches still held him out.
TB was a revelation when he started 2023, smart, attacking. Everything Edmunds wasn't. And he elevated Milano's game as well. Would have been interesting if he and Milano could have had more chances to develop that in 2022.
The other thing about giving Bishop some opportunities here and there is you challenge Rapp and Hamlin, let them know why Bishop is getting some time and how they need to pick up their play.
I agree with BananaB that this defense isn't good enough to survive deep in the playoffs, especially with how slow our safeties are to react with little anticipation. We need to be doing everything we can to get better in time for that.
-
1
-
-
I think the idea of game oversight by a studio official with power to overrule is a good potential option due to the speed of the game.
The other biggest thing to me, is getting more consistency of calls by officials from game to game. I think there needs to be more and a lot of feedback from an oversight committee between games and even within games about the judgement quality of the calls being made, and if the officials are zeroed in on one team too much.
Much of the PI and holding rules have evolved to depend on refs judgement, whereas in the past they were looking at specific markers. Holding now means significantly restricting or changing the path of the defender and doesn't discuss hand placement inside or out. PI has to significantly impact the receiver's chance to catch the ball and in many situations the defender has equal opportunity to attack the ball. "Incidental" contact/hand fighting is now more allowable than in the past.
Refs in all sports swallow the whistle more at the waning moments of games, regardless that Cincy TE got hosed on the two point conversion. Yet, if the ref didn't have a good angle, I could see how they felt the contact wasn't impactful enough.
-
9 hours ago, GunnerBill said:
I think you are still being blinded by the 1st round price tag. After 3 years in the league I'm judging you by what you have done for me as a pro.
I get it, you think he's had enough opportunities and I don't. Definitely understand and respect your view, just happen to disagree.
If I'm blinded by anything about him, it's 6'1" 4.39 sec and the fact that he "pops" at times on the field with quick agility and playmaking ability. I would also say McDermott probably shares your view, I just hope he changes his mind enough to throw him more scraps. The kid seems tough, wants to win and is eager for opportunities.
-
On 11/5/2024 at 12:29 PM, GunnerBill said:
See the difference is I think he has had those chances and failed. It is the end of year 3 now. He played better the other day, that is a positive. But there is a body of work to judge him on.
Sure, but if a late developer, you take his rookie season with a grain of salt. Last year he was trying to play with torn ankle ligaments until the team IR'd him.
Sunday he probably sustained a dislocated shoulder on that long pass play to Hill.
I can't find his quote but saw it post game to the effect that once they popped his shoulder back in he returned to the game because he wasn't leaving for anything.
Make the effort to get the kid some reps where you can. His body of work isn't very extensive.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Jukester said:
Yes, i think you're absolutely correct. During the game, i assumed the ref had a bad angle and thought Dawkins yanked the defender down by his arms. But this video shows the ref having a perfect view of what Dawkins did. I think that Edwards piling on was when he decided to throw the flag.
Looking at it again, I think the ref pinned the foul on Dawkins but clearly Edwards didn't fall on Chop until he was on the ground, probably the ref felt the effect of both men combined was a foul.
-
3 hours ago, Augie said:
We like Baldy today. 😊
I think it's a very weak call, but I think the call was made because you're not allowed to hold down a defender on the ground. Not sure if the guard laying on top of him mattered, but the ref doesn't throw the flag until the defender's on the ground trying to move his torso with Dawkin's extended arms on his shoulders/upper back.
From the NFL Rule book: https://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/nfl-rulebook/#article-3-illegal-block-by-offensive-player
If a blocker falls on or pushes down a defender whose momentum is carrying him to the ground, Offensive Holding will not be called unless the blocker prevents the defender from rising from the ground.
So they could have called it on the guard who fell on top of Chop.
-
3
-
-
35 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
That applies to Bishop more than Elam for me. I want them to have packages to get Bishop on the field on D even if its in relatively limited ways. Reason being is I think our corners are very good indeed. Our safeties are not. So get the high potential rookie involved somehow now the division is all but won.
Totally agree on Bishop, I know my take on Elam isn't very popular, just as it wasn't when I voiced my disagreement with them stashing Bernard his entire rookie season.
I respect McDermott and his process, but we're not trying to build a contender anymore, thanks to Josh we ARE a contender. In the bigger picture McD needs to add some wrinkles to his process to identify and maximize our unique talent contributions every year. That's why I feel Elam deserves a quicker and better plan until he fails. He's got great speed and potential intangibles. If developed, even if still a backup, he could give us an extra dimensional matchup and playmaking ability in the playoffs.
We can't be content with simply winning the regular season and how things appear against the weaker teams in the regular season. We know what to expect in the playoffs and must gear for that even if it means mistakes and taking some losses to develop our best talent now.
-
11 hours ago, BigAl2526 said:
McDermott is always going to opt not to fix something that isn't broke.
And this is the crux of where I feel McDermott needs to improve. Thinking something isn't broke during the regular season isn't the same as when we are up against the top teams in the playoffs. Push the development of targeted rookies/backups that could have critical roles in improving what doesn't appear broken yet. Especially if they may be playmakers, not just scheme executors. DL, safety and CB. It's going to take multiple games for rookies/backups to get comfortable on the field and there is no substitute for it.
I'm not saying the change of personnel has to happen, just that McD whittle out some opportunity when game conditions allow and see if these guys show enough to warrant it.
In Elam's case, he seems able to handle game situations, but no one will truly know how well until he gets game minutes. Why wait until next year if there's a possibility you can develop him to contribute in the playoffs this year?
Yeah, this guy gets it: https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/nfl/bills-defense-in-desperate-need-of-injection-of-rookie-talent/ar-AA1tybz8?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=658e77147ca04fdda4486a48d8c5bcf0&ei=17
-
1
-
Chiefs sign former Pro bowl OT Humphries
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
Watt's good, but much like Bruce, Garrett makes far more plays in the run game and down the LOS.
Couple that with the fact that Cleveland doesn't have much to play for, despite Garrett's post game pressor.