SDS

I can hit just fine, but I'm not made for HR's. No big deal. It doesn't make me any less of a man. I don't need to spend $300 to join a HR derby. Those banned bats are ridiculous ego builders which you readily admit to, so I don't see why you are arguing with me. If you don't need a crutch then why use it?

You just don't get it Pete. Why not just catch the ball with your hand - run to the outfield and toss it over the fence? Just as valid in my book. All you are saying is that you are not strong enough to hit it out yourself with a normal bat. You need help. You need technology to do what your biceps can't. Hardly something to brag about.

and only one of those bats is ASA legal. And for $300... what a deal.

I was trying to look for info on the: DeMarini 2005 Ultimate Weapon Singlewall... It's $99. Which still seems outrageous, but I don't want to dent a cheap one either. My current 10 year old Louisville Slugger chatters my teeth with every swing. My hands hurt so bad after BP I need ibuprofen.

the problem is that most any bat that is actually approved by the ASA is apparently not worthy of BEING reviewed! All the reviews are from the banned list and maybe a couple 98 MPH ones for $200+...

there is a reason leagues ban these bats... not everyone is meant to hit HRs. If your leagues limit HR's then why use a $300 bat if you don't need 50 more feet of manhood?

and this helps me how?

and if you use one - consider yourself a pink panty wearing p****. BTW - YOU aren't hitting bombs with those - the bat is. I guess in the age of Viagra any artifical means up pumping up one's manhood is "money well spent". Go get 'em tiger. You da bomb.

$200-$300 for a softball bat? Since when did a bat match the cost of a decent Home Theater Surround Sound receiver? For all you big men hitting Freaks and Synergies - do you hit from the women's tees too? Afterall - artifically adding 30 feet to your swing is like moving the fence in closer - just for you. Does anyone know of a decent bat for $100? You would think that should be able to buy you a good bat, but I'm not so sure anymore.

very cool thread: http://www.thefuselage.com/threaded/index.php?topic=11340.0 I like alot of what is said here - in particular the parallels betrween Locke and Ethan.

Perhaps they are checking to see if the last person who left turned out the lights?

Correction: I pay the bills, but it is with donated money.

A fan of Triumph huh? God Bless you and Fight the Good Fight....

One thing for sure - my mug will never be on there. However, these other guys have been wait8ing for their busts far too long.

I have quite a list of who should be on there - it's just finding the time to compile the info and format it that is holding me up.... and the years tick by....

1 hour.... 6 hours.... who's counting?

http://www.animationartwork.com/images/sku2398.jpg

here is the last picture I took of them: http://www.deanguitars.com/wallpaper/custom2/twins.jpg

Don't get me started. I'd hate to have to plant your ass in the turf.

I have it on VHS if you want to borrow it...

Video

Isn't that the same as drinking it from the urinal? BTW, how much salt does one actually use?

Well Chris, you see it's like this: You can tout your reasons for being against DRM all day long, but you know well that the side benefit of being able to steal the content and mass distribute it is the elephant sittnig in the living room. You know it's there, but you don't want to talk about it. The copyright holders have the same gig. They talk about their reasons for DRM, but fail to point out that they will try and use it to extract more money from the consumers. So both sides are disengenuous. However, no DRM is not feasible in the day of perfect recordings and worldwide distribution for free. So option 1 isn't really an option.

"- All "information" and "ideas", which includes music, software, text, and other unique works, should be allowed to freely flow between people in an unlimited fashion without any encumbrances of ownership;" How can you stomach this hippie crap?