Let's just breakdown your rant...
1. Wilson just wants to sell jerseys!
- It sounded good because it was a nice negative statement to demonize the owner, but as I pointed out - it isn't true.
2. Wilson made this choice...
- So, when our head coach/GM says he wants/needs a dynamic scatback in his offense long before the draft, and our resident insider says the Bills will draft certain linemen if they fall to us at #9, but will take CJ Spiller if the linemen are off the board - you conclude that Ralph Wilson made the selection? How does one actually reply to such an "analysis"?
3. Wilson is more concerned about selling tickets than winning!
Nice false choice. Draft Spiller and lose or draft the way you want and win. Let's just follow the illogic here. The corollary to your argument is if the Bills win games they would have an empty stadium? So, Ralph needs to avoid winning so he can make money by drawing people to the stadium by losing with gimmick players? The only thing missing in this argument is a Hitler reference.
And to continue on with point 3... Think about your "point" for a minute. If Wilson did force the pick of Spiller (he did not) to sell more jerseys (it doesn't work that way), and in order to sell more tickets (this is apparently a bad thing to do) then the overall point you're making is Wilson needs to be chided for putting a product on the field that more people want to watch... What a bastard.
Stringing a bunch of negative thoughts together, and repeating them over and over, just because they superficially support your opinion doesn't make a supportive argument. Constantly referring to CJ, who by all accounts seems to be a tremendous person, as a "gimmick" in order to marginalize him before his 1st snap is also rather unfortunate.
No one said you had to like his selection, but your argument against it is just poorly thought out.