Buftex Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Last week at this time, and more so throughouth the week, a good number lot of threads showed up here criticizing the Bills' front office for a lack-luster FA period. Lack of signings made people around here mad. Did something happen this weekend to make that change? Because all those threads are gone. Just wondering. You see, the more people make new threads for pointless things, the further back all those old posts go...bdelma! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
millbank Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 my goodness a "rooster-a-hoop" reference.... to have such right on the tip of the tongue.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 if i am to be called a 'rooster-a-hoop', i prefer this definition - ADJECTIVE: 1. Being in a state of boastful elation or exultation. 2. Being askew. ETYMOLOGY: From the phrase to set rooster on hoop, to drink festively. On your next visit to Cockaigne don't forget your cockade you rooster-a-hoop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billsfreak Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Last week at this time, and more so throughouth the week, a good number lot of threads showed up here criticizing the Bills' front office for a lack-luster FA period. Lack of signings made people around here mad. Did something happen this weekend to make that change? Because all those threads are gone. Just wondering. You obviously didn't read too many threads, there were approx. 70% of the posts who were not in favor of the T.O. signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Normally, I hold back from adding my two cents into a discussion like this, but I thought Flbillsfan#1's post was obviously sarcastic, hence the all-cap words for ironic emphasis. However, maybe I just prefer to read it that way because it makes the later comment about sarcasm flying over people's heads incredibly funny. You read my 1st post correctly which is why my 2nd post is so funny. The IRONY of Sage not getting the OBVIOUS Sarcasm of my sarcastic reply to the origional poster is just TOO FUNNY. He must feel REALLY STUPID. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Senator Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 On your next visit to Cockaigne don't forget your cockade you rooster-a-hoop. you cocker spaniel - that is a cockeyed, cockamamie idea. time for a cocktail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lets_go_bills Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Last week at this time, and more so throughouth the week, a good number lot of threads showed up here criticizing the Bills' front office for a lack-luster FA period. Lack of signings made people around here mad. Did something happen this weekend to make that change? Because all those threads are gone. Just wondering. Well we did sign Terrell Owens. It's kind of a big deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Last week at this time, and more so throughouth the week, a good number lot of threads showed up here criticizing the Bills' front office for a lack-luster FA period. Lack of signings made people around here mad. Did something happen this weekend to make that change? Because all those threads are gone. Just wondering. Don't worry, they always come back. Just wait till draft day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SageAgainstTheMachine Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 You read my 1st post correctly which is why my 2nd post is so funny. The IRONY of Sage not getting the OBVIOUS Sarcasm of my sarcastic reply to the origional poster is just TOO FUNNY. He must feel REALLY STUPID. Hey, it's not my fault that you suck at being sarcastic, brother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 Hey, it's not my fault that you suck at being sarcastic, brother. The other poster GOT IT. Oh the IRONY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flbillsfan#1 Posted March 9, 2009 Share Posted March 9, 2009 You obviously didn't read too many threads, there were approx. 70% of the posts who were not in favor of the T.O. signing. A poll that was on the Board was almost 85% in favor of the TO signing so I think your numbers are OFF a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts