WellDressed Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Check out this map of murders in Philly from 2006: http://inquirer.philly.com/graphics/murders_map/ NICE!! Only three knifings between 12 am and 6 am. woops, make that 5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattyT Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Best homer article on the subject.... http://www.realfootball365.com/articles/bills/13643 C'mon your honor...he's not a bad guy. He probably wasn't gonna use it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 You need to do a bit of legwork, learn about the crumbs that were shot while committing crimes, and learn about the term "race racketeer". The riots were bogus. Just another chance to commit violence, and looting. fair enough, im sure there are very valid reasons that Cincinnati is known as one of the worst places for race relations in the country... but what was your point in your original post i commented on? was i close with any of my guesses? he didnt need the gun because only white people are at risk in bad neighborhoods? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 fair enough, im sure there are very valid reasons that Cincinnati is known as one of the worst places for race relations in the country... but what was your point in your original post i commented on? was i close with any of my guesses? he didnt need the gun because only white people are at risk in bad neighborhoods? Since you are sure, please educate us all, and let us know exactly what those valid reasons are that make Cincinnati known as one of the worst places for race relations. Don't omit black hatred, as you search and tell us. I await your facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrDawkinstein Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Since you are sure, please educate us all, and let us know exactly what those valid reasons are that make Cincinnati known as one of the worst places for race relations. Don't omit black hatred, as you search and tell us. I await your facts. way to skirt the question... so you dont have a point you want to admit to in your original post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Da Big Man Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 You can take the gangster out of the city, but you can't take the city out of the gangster! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R!P REVOLUTIONARIES Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 Regardless if the gun belonged to Lynch or if he violated a concealed weapon law, the civil liberties of the people in this country are gradually being trampled on. Everyday we move closer & closer to a soft form of fascism. Like it was in Nazi, Germany, they would approach any citizen they wanted to & say "papers please". Violation of privacy, checkpoints, profiling and warrantless searches are common things used in this country to "protect" us from ourselves. The definition of a free society is where you can do whatever you want unless it involves harming others. That notion has been ignored for years now, as our "leaders" pretend they are doing us a favor by violating our rights. They say "We are protecting your freedom" while at the very same time violating that very same freedom they pretend to pretect. It's total hipocracy. Based on the information we have so far, the police had no probable cause to search the vehicle. Let's pretend they did have probable cause. They find the gun & Lynch is where he's at now. He is being charged with possesion of a CONCEALED weapon. He is legally allowed to have it, but not allowed to conceal it. Apparently a gun concealed in a trunk is more dangerous than a gun exposed on the waist of an individual in a car. After all he would have a better success rate in a drive by with the gun in the trunk. He would have a better chance at shooting someone if he had to first open the trunk and then run out of the car, get it and then shoot someone. Lynch should have known better. Next time he should strap the gun on his forehead, chest or mount it on the front of the wind-sheild. Even if he would have had it exposed, he would have still gotten hassled about it. "Papers Please." What about the people who don't even own a gun, getting their privacy violated!? There's more freedom in Canada & Switzerland than this country! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Endzone Animal Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 I would imagine the love for the Bills to be at an all time low right about now. People will be giving up their season tickets this year faster than you can flush a toilet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cåblelady Posted February 17, 2009 Share Posted February 17, 2009 I would imagine the love for the Bills to be at an all time low right about now. People will be giving up their season tickets this year faster than you can flush a toilet. Don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Poland Posted February 18, 2009 Share Posted February 18, 2009 Based on the information we have so far, the police had no probable cause to search the vehicle. Let's pretend they did have probable cause. They find the gun & Lynch is where he's at now. He is being charged with possesion of a CONCEALED weapon. He is legally allowed to have it, but not allowed to conceal it. Can you show us a sorce for this, where it has been determined that the police had no probable cause? I wonder what kind of excuses and stories you were pushing for lynch when he ran a woman over with his suv and left her in the street? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts