molson_golden2002 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/04/04/...lors/index.html Thank Darwin! I mean God! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 That's good to here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ieatcrayonz Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 That's good to here. Good to where? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Good to where? To the GPS spot that listed them in Iraqi waters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted April 4, 2007 Author Share Posted April 4, 2007 Good to where? This benefits Canada more than anyone else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketch Soland Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Ahmadinejad is a crafty fellow. It will be interesting to see how much political capital he thinks he can win out of this "goodwill" gesture.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prognastic Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Ahmadinejad is a crafty fellow. It will be interesting to see how much political capital he thinks he can win out of this "goodwill" gesture.... Well played by the Iranian "dictator". He saves face and curries favor around the world as a kind and gentle leader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Well played by the Iranian "dictator". He saves face and curries favor around the world as a kind and gentle leader. Are you being sarcastic here or are you just very naive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Avenger Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Well played by the Iranian "dictator". He saves face and curries favor around the world as a kind and gentle leader. News for you - Ahmadinejad isn't the power in Iran - he's merely the face of political power. The Ayatollahs run the show and control the Republican Guard and are the folks calling the shots on this and all other matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PastaJoe Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Dick Cheney and OCinPhilly must be disappointed that they're losing this opportunity to advocate military action against Iran. Negotiating a peaceful settlement is such an impediment to the neo-con agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted April 4, 2007 Author Share Posted April 4, 2007 Dick Cheney and OCinPhilly must be disappointed that they're losing this opportunity to advocate military action against Iran. Negotiating a peaceful settlement is such an impediment to the neo-con agenda. So true! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted April 4, 2007 Author Share Posted April 4, 2007 "Peace in Our Time!!!!" RIGHT, Joe and Molton? Poor little boo boo doesn't get to see the bombs go boom! Ahhhhh, poor little thing. Go play with your GI Joe doll now, that will make you feel better! Call me when Iran is demanding the Sudentenland, ok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicot Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Go find where I advocated or pined for war with Iran in regards to THIS situation or anywhere else, you dipwad. You missed the point, AGAIN. The point is not some kind of disappointment for whats taking place or could have taken place NOW. Its about what this means FOR THE FUTURE. What are the ramifications around how Britain and the West reacted, what Iran feels they go out of this situation and what that means about how these Countries will react and act IN THE FUTURE. And nice way to minimize a threat, considering that Iran would like to see countries "wiped off the map." And finally, diplomacy DIDNT WORK HERE, sh---for-brains. Iran didnt realase the soldiers due to negotiations of any sort....they did it on their own. We don't know that. It's quite possible that some sort of deal was worked out behind the scenes. Just because we haven't heard about it doesn't mean it hasn't happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 We don't know that. It's quite possible that some sort of deal was worked out behind the scenes. Just because we haven't heard about it doesn't mean it hasn't happened. If it did, it's almost certain the Iranians would be shouting it from the rooftops, as it would be a concrete indicator that a major Western power is treating them as an equal and not a backwards post-colonial nation...which is really what they want, anyway. Equal one-on-one negotiations between Iran and Britian or the US would be a major diplomatic victory, and not something to be kept secret. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
molson_golden2002 Posted April 4, 2007 Author Share Posted April 4, 2007 Go find where I advocated or pined for war with Iran in regards to THIS situation or anywhere else, you dipwad. You missed the point, AGAIN. The point is not some kind of disappointment for whats taking place or could have taken place NOW. Its about what this means FOR THE FUTURE. What are the ramifications around how Britain and the West reacted, what Iran feels they go out of this situation and what that means about how these Countries will react and act IN THE FUTURE. And nice way to minimize a threat, considering that Iran would like to see countries "wiped off the map." And finally, diplomacy DIDNT WORK HERE, sh---for-brains. Iran didnt realase the soldiers due to negotiations of any sort....they did it on their own. No, you were just waving the appeasement flag as if getting these guys released was some sort of a defeat. That's all. Only a neocon idiot like yourself would find this as a bad thing. Can't blame some of us for thinking you were hoping they all got killed so you jack asses could use it as an excuse to kill more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdh1 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Dick Cheney and OCinPhilly must be disappointed that they're losing this opportunity to advocate military action against Iran. Negotiating a peaceful settlement is such an impediment to the neo-con agenda. Yep, good thing Iran took hostages again and this time is was for only a few days, instead of 400+. President Tom of Iran must be mellowing in his old age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chef Jim Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Dick Cheney and OCinPhilly must be disappointed that they're losing this opportunity to advocate military action against Iran. Negotiating a peaceful settlement is such an impediment to the neo-con agenda. Or the Brits and the US could have told the Iranians to let them free or they would not recognize the majority of their country in 48 hours. It may have ended peacably but it may have been negotiated with force. Why did the Irananians back down so quickly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VABills Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 Or the Brits and the US could have told the Iranians to let them free or they would not recognize the majority of their country in 48 hours. It may have ended peacably but it may have been negotiated with force. Why did the Irananians back down so quickly? Of course just with anything else, we'll never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketch Soland Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 We don't know that. It's quite possible that some sort of deal was worked out behind the scenes. Just because we haven't heard about it doesn't mean it hasn't happened. Of course just with anything else, we'll never know. *Peak Perspective Achieved* /PPP Forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erynthered Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 I wonder if they got to keep those suits that were made for them. TJ Mohammed's sure has a nice selection of suits, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts