nodnarb Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 sweet. I'd rather have Dillon than Rhodes or Brown. He's got some fight left. McGahee for a 2nd would be a nice ending for that goofball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1billsfan Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Corey Dillon..Dominic Rhodes...are they serious? Why are they so desperate to get rid of McGahee for these guy...unreal. Dillon (platooned back) = 13 TDs in 2006 199 carries/812 yards/4.1 per McGahee (full time starter) = 6 TDs in 2006 259 carries/990 yards/3.8 per So to answer your question, yes they're serious. Dillon happens to be a better RB than McGahee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Dillon (platooned back) = 13 TDs in 2006199 carries/812 yards/4.1 per McGahee (full time starter) = 6 TDs in 2006 259 carries/990 yards/3.8 per So to answer your question, yes they're serious. Dillon happens to be a better RB than McGahee. As old as Dillon is I'd much rather have him over Rhodes/Atrain/Chris Brown/Tj Duckett or any other p.o.s. on the free agent market as long as he's continuing to split carries. As a starter definitely not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 Dillon (platooned back) = 13 TDs in 2006199 carries/812 yards/4.1 per McGahee (full time starter) = 6 TDs in 2006 259 carries/990 yards/3.8 per So to answer your question, yes they're serious. Dillon happens to be a better RB than McGahee. At time he definatley was. Remember that teams stacked against willis last year while Dillon got to play behind NEw Englands' line w/ brady at the helm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willis da illest Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Dillon (platooned back) = 13 TDs in 2006199 carries/812 yards/4.1 per McGahee (full time starter) = 6 TDs in 2006 259 carries/990 yards/3.8 per So to answer your question, yes they're serious. Dillon happens to be a better RB than McGahee. Wow...Dillon...running behind a much better line...scratch that...with a much better offense...averages .3 yards better then McGahee. If you put McGahee on that team, I'm willing to be money that his #'s would be better then Dillon's as a platooned back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdelma Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Dillon (platooned back) = 13 TDs in 2006199 carries/812 yards/4.1 per McGahee (full time starter) = 6 TDs in 2006 259 carries/990 yards/3.8 per So to answer your question, yes they're serious. Dillon happens to be a better RB than McGahee. the Pats line is alot better than the crap Willis played with Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1billsfan Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 the Pats line is alot better than the crap Willis played with You say it's the line, I say it's the player. Maybe if McGahee tried to break a tackle or hit the hole, things which Dillon does with regularity, he'd have made his "crap" line actually appear "good". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BB27 Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 If Willis would hit the hole and just run, he'd be awesome, but I saw way to much dancing to think that anything would change with a better line. I'm happy to see him traded if it happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stinky finger Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 Wow...Dillon...running behind a much better line...scratch that...with a much better offense...averages .3 yards better then McGahee. If you put McGahee on that team, I'm willing to be money that his #'s would be better then Dillon's as a platooned back. So, what will your new name be? "dillon b chillin". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChevyVanMiller Posted March 8, 2007 Share Posted March 8, 2007 John Clayton looks like The Math Teacher Mr. Dewey from saved by the bell John Clayton is the world's oldest talking baby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts