Dual RB way to go Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Doesn't make sense to have two RB's as change of pace. Maybe A-Train wanted a 2-3 year deal guarenteed and Marv balked at it; hence, williams signing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swift Sylvan Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Doesn't make sense to have two RB's as change of pace. Maybe A-Train wanted a 2-3 year deal guarenteed and Marv balked at it; hence, williams signing? They aren't similar backs, We'll probably keep A-Train because he has different skills the Shaud or at least if we don't resign him it won't be for that reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fewell733 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 hard to say what the direction is there at this point. I tend to think that Shaud can't really fill A-Train's role though as a serious guy to take major carries in a game. Shaud and A-Train are pretty close to polar opposites as far as backs go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beerme1 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 I don't think there's a chance in hell Marv doesn't re sign A train because he signed Fraud Williams. No way in hell. Train kept a rollin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jarthur31 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Doesn't make sense to have two RB's as change of pace. Maybe A-Train wanted a 2-3 year deal guarenteed and Marv balked at it; hence, williams signing? I find that rather unlikely especially since is Willis being shopped around. Shaud wouldn't last the year if he were the starter or backup for any length of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Jokeman Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Doesn't make sense to have two RB's as change of pace. Maybe A-Train wanted a 2-3 year deal guarenteed and Marv balked at it; hence, williams signing? I could see us pass on re-signing A-train if we draft a RB to backup and eventually suceed Willis McGahee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Gun10 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 i will be ticked if they sign shaud get rid of A- train and willis and draft a rb i think, i dontthink a-train is great but i think hes a good backup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoho Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Besides many of these posts being illogical, are they all supposed to be in English? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fewell733 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Besides many of these posts being illogical, are they all supposed to be in English? just barely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROCCEO Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Doesn't make sense to have two RB's as change of pace. Maybe A-Train wanted a 2-3 year deal guarenteed and Marv balked at it; hence, williams signing? I know for a fact that is not the reason. However, the reason that Lionel Gates was cut last year did have something to do with the fact that he is a similar runner to A-Train and Willis, while shaud is markedly different. ALso, supposedly shaud possessed greater ability to absorb and retain the playbook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dual RB way to go Posted March 1, 2007 Author Share Posted March 1, 2007 I am Making the call now that "A-Train Will Not be Re-signed"!!! Here's why: A-Train the last 3 seasons: Total Yards: 960 Yards per carry: 3.1 4 TD's 2 Fumbles Career Catching Avg 6.7 Salary last year 939,000 Note: He would want a contract at least 3 million over 2 years guarenteed. S Williams last 3 years: 2004 4.0 YPC 2005 3.6 YPC 2006 2.0 with only 2 rushing attempts His catching: 2004 7.7 2005 8.3 2006 ---- Career 7.4 Salary last year 311,000 In the chris brown section of his signing, he said that he understood his diminished role because they were trying different people out in different situations (Mcgahee & A-Train). He answered like his lack of playing time last year was a sacfrice for the team; he'll get alot more this year. He's cheaper, can catch the ball better, play special teams, and has shown some ability to run the ball at times. Sorry everyone. A-Train is "Choo-Choo" - left the platform of the Buffalo Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMIEBUF12 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 well i like the a-train and hope we resign him.i thought when willis was out that a-train ran with more power and i thought he ran like you expect your starting runningback to run.go bills in"07 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebug Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 The "A" Train must keep a rollin on our tracks......Williams is a "B' back not an "A" back.... Go Bills! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bdelma Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Shaud Williams won't even make the team next year. What is so good about him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts