mackey7789 Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 He's gotta be the worst starting QB in the league. It's a shame for the Bears because with a different QB they would be a whole lot better. It's sad watching him try to lead this team to the superbowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 He's gotta be the worst starting QB in the league. It's a shame for the Bears because with a different QB they would be a whole lot better. It's sad watching him try to lead this team to the superbowl. Yep. Damn shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Yet, somehow he's on the verge of starting in the Superbowl. Whatever he's doing, he's doing enough of it to keep that team winning. It's not all about the plays, sometimes its about the other things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Does anyone here believe for a second the Bears wouldn't have 50 points on the board if they had JP Losman? Ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Yet, somehow he's on the verge of starting in the Superbowl. Whatever he's doing, he's doing enough of it to keep that team winning. It's not all about the plays, sometimes its about the other things. oh god Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Does anyone here believe for a second the Bears wouldn't have 50 points on the board if they had JP Losman? Ridiculous. Point is, it doesn't matter. Grossman did enough (and kept himself from doing enough damage) and the Bears are going to win the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KD in CA Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Yet, somehow he's on the verge of starting in the Superbowl. Whatever he's doing, he's doing enough of it to keep that team winning. It's not all about the plays, sometimes its about the other things. Sorry, but this guy isn't a 'hold the fort' guy like Trent Dilfer. He's a distinct liability. Chicago is in the SB as a result of superior defense, superior special teams and a solid running game. Even his one TD pass today was just him tossing it up for grabs. It took an overmatched corner and an outstanding catch by the receiver to make the play. Take away the four turnovers -- all true 'forced' turnovers by the D -- and this is probably a Saints win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Acantha Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Sorry, but this guy isn't a 'hold the fort' guy like Trent Dilfer. He's a distinct liability. Chicago is in the SB as a result of superior defense, superior special teams and a solid running game. Even his one TD pass today was just him tossing it up for grabs. It took an overmatched corner and an outstanding catch by the receiver to make the play. Take away the four turnovers -- all true 'forced' turnovers by the D -- and this is probably a Saints win. Why bother? Just take away the Bears defense, WR's, RB's and pass protection. The you could really be able to pinpoint how bad Grossman really is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kultarr Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Didn't you get the memo? It's all about the QB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Take away the four turnovers -- all true 'forced' turnovers by the D -- and this is probably a Saints win. Take away the score, the players, the coaches, the fans, the day and it's still saturday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maguire's Beer Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 When he sucks, he sucks. But he doesn't always suck. He going to need to not suck in two weeks if they want to win, because neither the Colts nor the Pats will roll over like the Aints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Two words: Mark Rypien. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 Rex Grossman just wins football games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhitnerIsAGod Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Who'd want Grossman as QB of the Bills? Just wondering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOOOOOO Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Who'd want Grossman as QB of the Bills? Just wondering. REX of course.... He makes the defense, special teams, pass/run blocking, and running game all complete ownage..... he just wins baby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeBillsDrive Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Rex will throw 3 interceptions in the Superbowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Rex Grossman just wins football games. So did Jim Miller and Shane Matthews. Doesn't mean Grossman isn't terrible. Dude has a great arm but his awareness (him trying to run a play at the end of the quarter instead of letting the clock run out or trying to call 2 timeouts in a row) and his decision-making would scare the hell out of me if I was a Bears fan. That said, Grossman will win me a lot of money in 2 weeks. He is a gift from the gambling gods. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffOrange Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 So did Jim Miller and Shane Matthews. Doesn't mean Grossman isn't terrible. Dude has a great arm but his awareness (him trying to run a play at the end of the quarter instead of letting the clock run out or trying to call 2 timeouts in a row) and his decision-making would scare the hell out of me if I was a Bears fan. Detect sarcasm better plz That said, Grossman will win me a lot of money in 2 weeks. He is a gift from the gambling gods. Right, because Vegas doesn't take the QB's into account when setting the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.Biscuit97 Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Detect sarcasm better plz Right, because Vegas doesn't take the QB's into account when setting the line. Well, it techinally was a true statement because he is 15-3 this year. And the line right now is Indy -7, which is like stealing from a baby. A greedy, rich baby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuntheDamnBall Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 Point is, it doesn't matter. Grossman did enough (and kept himself from doing enough damage) and the Bears are going to win the game. You're right, it doesn't matter. But it really is the ultimate example of the 'winning cures all ills' argument because that guy played a worse game than I'd ever seen in the clutch, a game that I think Losman is past finally, and yet he is the one whom there are still questions about among league people. Maybe I'm wrong and the Bears are drawing up other plans at QB for next year. For now, Lovie is probably doing the right thing wrt team morale. If that switch was going to be made it should have been made a long time ago. But Grossman sucks out loud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts