Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Look, Evans is already guaranteed to be the #1 WR come this fall. What I'm curious to see is who the Bills will pick up at #2, after Moulds leaves. Unless we dont get anyone good from the draft it will most likely be Davis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpizzy01 Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Look, Evans is already guaranteed to be the #1 WR come this fall. What I'm curious to see is who the Bills will pick up at #2, once Moulds leaves. I think the Antonio Bryant from the Browns would be a good choice to fill that position. We don't have to worry about the Browns keeping him because they have already said be will become a free agent. Come Levy, get him. 619696[/snapback]  I like Givens....depending on the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daquixers_is_back Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 What? Did the Bills already announce the cutting of Moulds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted March 7, 2006 Author Share Posted March 7, 2006 What? Did the Bills already announce the cutting of Moulds? 619740[/snapback] Â not yet, but it could be soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 The browns are probably gonna make a very strong push for david givens. He's familar with that offensive system, since crenell is there. would be a good target for the young quaterback charlie frye. I'd like to see if we cut moulds Ike Bruce. He's familar with fairchilds system, and evans while I wont compare him to torry "big game" holt he has similar attributes, so issac could take him under his wing like he did with holt. If not bruce then Antonio Bryant, keenan mccardell, koren robinson or joe jurevicius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfist Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 i like givens or isaac bruce..familiar with fairchild's system, doesnt seem to be a cancer..not too pricey...grab him if moulds is let go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pyrite Gal Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Givens is fine if the money us not too steep and another suggestions this applies to IMHO is Joe jurevicioys if the money is not too steep. Who klnows until the CBA is done or officially declared dead what the market cost will be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oneonta Buffalo Fan Posted March 7, 2006 Author Share Posted March 7, 2006 What about Antonion Bryant from the Browns? I think he's a free agent this year. He would be a half bad choice at #2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxxer Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Not a deep draft or FA when it comes to WR talent. Â It would be nice to sign Givens but someone will overpay for him, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truth on hold Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Look, Evans is already guaranteed to be the #1 WR come this fall. What I'm curious to see is who the Bills will pick up at #2, once Moulds leaves. I think the David Givens from the Patriots would be a good choice to fill that position. We don't have to worry about the Pats keeping him because they have already said be will become a free agent. Come Levy, get him. 619696[/snapback] that's easy: Terrrel Owens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 We are not going to find a receiver better than Moulds. I think we should keep him if at all possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 We are not going to find a receiver better than Moulds. I think we should keep him if at all possible. 619855[/snapback]  I hope he's kept also, just not @ the expense of getting a quality interior OL or two plus a DT in free agency, allowing us to use the 8th pick on the best available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pdh1 Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 i like givens or isaac bruce..familiar with fairchild's system, doesnt seem to be a cancer..not too pricey...grab him if moulds is let go 619769[/snapback] Â Â Bruce would be great for a year or two. Â Forget about Bryant from the Browns. Â Bryant=team cancer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tennesseeboy Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 I hope he's kept also, just not @ the expense of getting a quality interior OL or two plus a DT in free agency, allowing us to use the 8th pick on the best available. 619859[/snapback] Exactly. Marv has a tough decision there in trying to free up some dollars. I can't see us getting all that quality in free agency, though. I can't imaging 8 going to anything but Ngata or a trade down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orton's Arm Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 We are not going to find a receiver better than Moulds. I think we should keep him if at all possible. 619855[/snapback] Despite missing all those games in 2005 due to injury, Bruce has accumulated more yards than Moulds over the last three years. Their birthdays are less than a year apart, so I don't see age necessarily being more of a factor for one than the other.  But the main advantage to Bruce isn't that he might represent an upgrade over Moulds. It's that there's no way the Bills would pay him anywhere near the $7 million a year they'd have to pay to keep Moulds. We're not getting an elite WR at that position no matter what we do, so there's no sense in paying for one. Save cap space on that position, and go shopping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick in RaChaCha Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 jurevicius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Jurevicius is older then moulds  So this deal makes sense how? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Jurevicius is older then moulds So this deal makes sense how? 619980[/snapback]   He may have been considering him from a financial standpoint. Just a guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ACor58 Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Bruce, if he can stay healthy, could be a Lofton-esque impact for a year or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34-78-83 Posted March 7, 2006 Share Posted March 7, 2006 Chad Jackson in round 2 of the draft (if he makes it that far)....(given that our first round and 3rd round picks are spent on the defensive and offensive lines) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts