Tortured Soul Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 We all know the Pats list bogus injuries on the report. Does anyone know if the injuries to the three secondary members -Sanders, Starks, Gay - listed as questionable or figments of Belichik's imagination? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubes Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 We all know the Pats list bogus injuries on the report. Does anyone know if the injuries to the three secondary members -Sanders, Starks, Gay - listed as questionable or figments of Belichik's imagination? 488449[/snapback] I doubt it matters. Most likely, this is Belichick's sly plan to lure Tom Clements into thinking they have a banged up secondary, and we know what happens when Clements is faced with a banged up secondary. We get hammered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cugalabanza Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 We all know the Pats list bogus injuries on the report. Does anyone know if the injuries to the three secondary members -Sanders, Starks, Gay - listed as questionable or figments of Belichik's imagination? 488449[/snapback] Doesn't matter. Our coaches are so classy, not only would they not run up the score, they prefer not to take advantage of an opponent's weaknesses. That would be poor sportsmanship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Gross Posted October 28, 2005 Share Posted October 28, 2005 I doubt it matters. Most likely, this is Belichick's sly plan to lure Tom Clements into thinking they have a banged up secondary, and we know what happens when Clements is faced with a banged up secondary.We get hammered. 488533[/snapback] Except for Darin.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATBNG Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 We all know the Pats list bogus injuries on the report. Does anyone know if the injuries to the three secondary members -Sanders, Starks, Gay - listed as questionable or figments of Belichik's imagination? 488449[/snapback] If I had to guess, I'd say Starks is 100% likely to play. Gay is probably in the 75% range to play at least a little bit (he seemingly had a setback this week although he played sporadically in Denver after missing a few games), and I'd put Sanders more at 25% (hasn't yet practiced). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fezmid Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 We all know the Pats list bogus injuries on the report. Does anyone know if the injuries to the three secondary members -Sanders, Starks, Gay - listed as questionable or figments of Belichik's imagination? 488449[/snapback] Actually BB has noticed that teams with banged up secondaries beat Buffalo, so he probably went and injured them himself. CW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meazza Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 is it me or has every team we played vs this year had a banged up secondary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 I wouldn't know. We don't throw the ball deep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rubes Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 is it me or has every team we played vs this year had a banged up secondary 489277[/snapback] No, just the ones we don't throw against. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oneida Lake Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 is it me or has every team we played vs this year had a banged up secondary 489277[/snapback] The Pats really are banged up. In a prevent defensive set 2 weeks ago they inserted 2 wide receivers. This team is as close to ripe for a loss as we've seen since the Milloy game. Offensive and defensive coordinators gone. Dillon banged up (and even bigger, he works without a yardage incentive clause in his contract this year!), Matt Light gone, the o line looking average and Brady looking vulnerable. Hell, even Belichick just got a divorce. McGahee is going to have a big game. Turn down the sound on the TV because the Brady stuff will make you barf, but hang in for a late game surprise. I predict a win on Monday Night Football for the Bills. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 The Pats really are banged up. In a prevent defensive set 2 weeks ago they inserted 2 wide receivers. This team is as close to ripe for a loss as we've seen since the Milloy game. Offensive and defensive coordinators gone. Dillon banged up (and even bigger, he works without a yardage incentive clause in his contract this year!), Matt Light gone, the o line looking average and Brady looking vulnerable. Hell, even Belichick just got a divorce. McGahee is going to have a big game. Turn down the sound on the TV because the Brady stuff will make you barf, but hang in for a late game surprise. I predict a win on Monday Night Football for the Bills. 489304[/snapback] Terrific! The game's on Sunday night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts