Homelander Posted Sunday at 01:52 AM Author Posted Sunday at 01:52 AM Crickets from @BillsFanNC @B-Man and @Big Blitz - shocker.
JDHillFan Posted Monday at 09:42 PM Posted Monday at 09:42 PM 49 minutes ago, Homelander said: OH NO!!!
Andy1 Posted Monday at 10:38 PM Posted Monday at 10:38 PM 1 hour ago, Homelander said: If Obama did this, Fox and Republicans would go bonkers for 24/365. With Trumpy, it’s “who cares?”. Of course the government is bankrupt but this is necessary and wise use of public funds.
JDHillFan Posted Monday at 10:47 PM Posted Monday at 10:47 PM 8 minutes ago, Andy1 said: If Obama did this, Fox and Republicans would go bonkers for 24/365. With Trumpy, it’s “who cares?”. Of course the government is bankrupt but this is necessary and wise use of public funds. Public funds, huh? 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻
Andy1 Posted Monday at 10:55 PM Posted Monday at 10:55 PM 7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Public funds, huh? 🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻 Correction - funded with private donors but still…. Is this necessary?
JDHillFan Posted Monday at 11:08 PM Posted Monday at 11:08 PM 11 minutes ago, Andy1 said: Correction - funded with private donors but still…. Is this necessary? Seems goofy to me. Is your line on spending either private or public funds drawn at “necessary”?
Andy1 Posted Monday at 11:42 PM Posted Monday at 11:42 PM 30 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Seems goofy to me. Is your line on spending either private or public funds drawn at “necessary”? It’s stupid either way. Call me a traditionalist but I’d rather not have each president remodel the White House at their whims. It’s a historic building that belongs to we the people. Not the temporary servants who reside there.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted yesterday at 12:04 AM Posted yesterday at 12:04 AM 1 hour ago, Andy1 said: If Obama did this, Fox and Republicans would go bonkers for 24/365. With Trumpy, it’s “who cares?”. Of course the government is bankrupt but this is necessary and wise use of public funds. If Obama ran surveillance operations against his opponents, exposed some poor filmmaker to the wrath of radical Muslims by lying about the assault on Benghazi, knew the origins of the Russian hookers story but decided not to tell you, allowed his Sec of State to act incredibly recklessly with classified material, allowed his VP to take/maintain/recklessly handle classified material at home, caged children and looked the other when Vlad annexed Crimea… He would still be as popular as ever with liberals. 1 1
OrangeBills Posted yesterday at 12:08 AM Posted yesterday at 12:08 AM On 10/4/2025 at 10:30 PM, Homelander said: My guess is you are smart enough to know that this isn't true, but you're going along for reasons. If that's not the case, let me state that what Trump is doing is ENTIRELY devoted to AMERICANS who have been suffering due to Leftist policies.
Andy1 Posted yesterday at 12:18 AM Posted yesterday at 12:18 AM 13 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: If Obama ran surveillance operations against his opponents, exposed some poor filmmaker to the wrath of radical Muslims by lying about the assault on Benghazi, knew the origins of the Russian hookers story but decided not to tell you, allowed his Sec of State to act incredibly recklessly with classified material, allowed his VP to take/maintain/recklessly handle classified material at home, caged children and looked the other when Vlad annexed Crimea… He would still be as popular as ever with liberals. So what do you think about the demolition on the side of the White House?
JDHillFan Posted yesterday at 12:25 AM Posted yesterday at 12:25 AM 4 minutes ago, Andy1 said: So what do you think about the demolition on the side of the White House? From wire reports: The White House on Monday started tearing down part of the East Wing, the traditional base of operations for the first lady, Is this really worthy of the pearl clutching that you and (checks notes) BILLSTIME are doing? It comes off as incredibly lame. Maybe you should focus on NO KINGS.
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted yesterday at 12:57 AM Posted yesterday at 12:57 AM 27 minutes ago, Andy1 said: So what do you think about the demolition on the side of the White House? Pretty close to your perspective, I’d bet. I’d prefer to see the money go to other causes…cancer research, children’s charities, that sort of thing. But it’s not my money, not my cause and in the end, if there wasn’t a ruckus being raised I wouldn’t know it was happening. I’m a sucker for old buildings especially with historic significance, I I was lucky enough to see the Roosevelt Pool in the NYS governors mansion many years ago and it was very cool and awe-inspiring. I’d hate to see that building torn down. 1
Andy1 Posted 9 hours ago Posted 9 hours ago So here is Trumps plan for the People’s house. Strange, I never heard of any public process to this project. No public notice or discussion. One would think that it would require approval through Congress. I guess a king needs his palace, nearly twice as large as the White House. Hopefully whoever comes after Orange will take a wrecking ball to it.
JDHillFan Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 14 minutes ago, Andy1 said: So here is Trumps plan for the People’s house. Strange, I never heard of any public process to this project. No public notice or discussion. One would think that it would require approval through Congress. I guess a king needs his palace, nearly twice as large as the White House. Hopefully whoever comes after Orange will take a wrecking ball to it. Yesterday you were all about cost and necessity. Today, you hope somebody takes a wrecking ball to it cost/necessity be damned. consistency in your principles is overrated. Especially when the subject is TRUMP.
Recommended Posts