Royale with Cheese Posted September 18 Posted September 18 1 minute ago, Max Fischer said: How do you know they are illegal if they don't get a day in court? It’s that simple. Many Americans and legal folks have spent extended periods of time sitting in detention without seeing a judge. That is the ICE system and all of MAGA is cheering it on. MAGA doesn't believe in due process and if a folks get lost in the system, then oh well, at least we are getting rid of “those” people. You can't be that ignorant. Answer the question. Lets say you're living next door to an illegal immigrant that is going to trial for a violent crime like rape or armed burglary or is a child predator. He can't go to trial for a few years because there's millions of other cases clogging up the court systems. Would you want to live next door to this man? Would you support this man and his due process? Are you really, and I mean really saying that the only way to prove they are illegal is through trial? You aren't really saying that are you? I work in HR, its very simple lol. But our Government won't be able to determine prior if people are illegal or legal? Really?
JFKjr Posted September 18 Posted September 18 2 hours ago, Roundybout said: No, it was the government. Rolling Stone had a very good article on it. They didn’t think Kimmel did anything wrong, but they feared retaliation. There is no way to spin it otherwise. Good old Rolling Stone. 1
Lost Posted September 18 Posted September 18 Roundy quoting Harry Sisson...who is quoting Rolling Stone. The ultimate bastions of truth ............................................________ ....................................,.-'"...................``~., .............................,.-"..................................."-., .........................,/...............................................":, .....................,?......................................................, .................../...........................................................,} ................./......................................................,:`^`..} .............../...................................................,:"........./ ..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../ ............./__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../ .........../(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`........_/ ..........{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....} ...........((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../ ...,,,___.`~,......"~.,....................`.....}............../ ............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-" ............/.`~,......`-...................................../ .............`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....,__ ,,_..........}.>-._...................................|..............`=~-, .....`=~-,__......`,................................. ...................`=~-,,.,............................... ................................`:,,...........................`..............__ .....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==`` ........................................_..........._,-%.......` ..................................., 1 1
Roundybout Posted September 18 Posted September 18 2 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: So they are universally true right? If a Rolling Stone says it, it is without a doubt they're right? It's objective? Well I mean ABC had a direct chance to fight for Kimmel. Do you think they have Attorney's or not? And they didn't. Why didn't ABC fight it? Because they’re in bed with Trump lmao The media billionaires are all in bed with MAGA because they’re getting handed all the tax breaks they want. 2 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Reminiscent of when you claimed Project Liberal was an economic think tank. You have no idea what you are talking about unless you are trying to redefine “very good source for media”. Embarrassing. https://adfontesmedia.com/rolling-stone-bias-and-reliability/ What is incorrect about what they wrote in the article I linked above? Do you have a source that says it’s not true?
Royale with Cheese Posted September 18 Posted September 18 Just now, Roundybout said: Because they’re in bed with Trump lmao The media billionaires are all in bed with MAGA because they’re getting handed all the tax breaks they want. The media is without a doubt left leaning. ABC, CNBC, MSNBC, CNN are all left leaning. The entertainment industry is left leaning lol. Can you make sense? Between this and your Rolling Stone example....I mean come on lol. 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted September 18 Posted September 18 2 hours ago, Royale with Cheese said: So they are universally true right? If a Rolling Stone says it, it is without a doubt they're right? It's objective? Well I mean ABC had a direct chance to fight for Kimmel. Do you think they have Attorney's or not? And they didn't. Why didn't ABC fight it? Roundy is a total stoner.
Roundybout Posted September 18 Posted September 18 Just now, Royale with Cheese said: The media is without a doubt left leaning. ABC, CNBC, MSNBC, CNN are all left leaning. The entertainment industry is left leaning lol. Can you make sense? Between this and your Rolling Stone example....I mean come on lol. Not for long! Social media barons like Zuck and Elon have already fallen in lockstep with MAGA. This is not debatable. ABC just bent the knee to MAGA. I’m certain other networks will do so as well. Besides, MSM is afraid of Trump anyways. That’s why they’ve already given up on Epstein.
JFKjr Posted September 18 Posted September 18 Just now, Roundybout said: Not for long! Social media barons like Zuck and Elon have already fallen in lockstep with MAGA. This is not debatable. ABC just bent the knee to MAGA. I’m certain other networks will do so as well. Besides, MSM is afraid of Trump anyways. That’s why they’ve already given up on Epstein. You shoulda voted for Kamala.
JDHillFan Posted September 18 Posted September 18 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: What is incorrect about what they wrote in the article I linked above? Do you have a source that says it’s not true? You stated that Rolling Stone is a very good source. The link I providedshowed you that it’s not. They are as unreliable and biased,as they come. It’s OK if you want to believe what they write despite their lack of credibility.
Royale with Cheese Posted September 18 Posted September 18 Just now, Roundybout said: Not for long! Social media barons like Zuck and Elon have already fallen in lockstep with MAGA. This is not debatable. ABC just bent the knee to MAGA. I’m certain other networks will do so as well. Besides, MSM is afraid of Trump anyways. That’s why they’ve already given up on Epstein. The reason they are changing is because the left is out of their minds. You admitted it several times that they are looking poor. But then you criticize them for leaving that party that is doing poor?????? Are they supposed to stay and support horrible policies? Why didn't the Dems do something positive to be looked at more positively? You don't believe in accountability. 43 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: Answer the question. Lets say you're living next door to an illegal immigrant that is going to trial for a violent crime like rape or armed burglary or is a child predator. He can't go to trial for a few years because there's millions of other cases clogging up the court systems. Would you want to live next door to this man? Would you support this man and his due process? Are you really, and I mean really saying that the only way to prove they are illegal is through trial? You aren't really saying that are you? I work in HR, its very simple lol. But our Government won't be able to determine prior if people are illegal or legal? Really? @Max Fischer Paging Max.
Roundybout Posted September 18 Posted September 18 6 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: You stated that Rolling Stone is a very good source. The link I providedshowed you that it’s not. They are as unreliable and biased,as they come. It’s OK if you want to believe what they write despite their lack of credibility. If that’s the case than it should be very easy to refute what they wrote. Good luck! 5 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: The reason they are changing is because the left is out of their minds. You admitted it several times that they are looking poor. But then you criticize them for leaving that party that is doing poor?????? Are they supposed to stay and support horrible policies? Why didn't the Dems do something positive to be looked at more positively? You don't believe in accountability. @Max Fischer Paging Max. Yes, leaving one party for the authoritarian one is bad. It’s like Jill Stein voters refusing to vote for Harris and then getting Trump.
JDHillFan Posted September 18 Posted September 18 2 minutes ago, Roundybout said: If that’s the case than it should be very easy to refute what they wrote. Good luck! When I see Rolling Stone, I don’t bother reading. They have no credibility. Why do you believe they are a good source? 5 minutes ago, Roundybout said: It’s like Jill Stein voters refusing to vote for Harris and then getting Trump. Which swing state did Jill Stein prevent Kamala from winning? 1
Royale with Cheese Posted September 18 Posted September 18 8 minutes ago, Roundybout said: If that’s the case than it should be very easy to refute what they wrote. Good luck! Yes, leaving one party for the authoritarian one is bad. It’s like Jill Stein voters refusing to vote for Harris and then getting Trump. So stay with the failing party? Lol. 1
Roundybout Posted September 18 Posted September 18 26 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: When I see Rolling Stone, I don’t bother reading. They have no credibility. Why do you believe they are a good source? Which swing state did Jill Stein prevent Kamala from winning? Pennsylvania 21 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: So stay with the failing party? Lol. You don’t have to choose authoritarianism, believe it or not!
AlBUNDY4TDS Posted September 18 Posted September 18 40 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Roundy is a total stoner. Why are you badmouthing stoners? 2 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Pennsylvania You don’t have to choose authoritarianism, believe it or not! Correct, you let the democrat party choose for you. See covid. 1
Royale with Cheese Posted September 18 Posted September 18 Just now, Roundybout said: Pennsylvania You don’t have to choose authoritarianism, believe it or not! So in your mind, there’s just no way that they just feel the Red is a better party? You know the motivation of me, Im a guy who walked away from the Dems because of these dumb policies. Maybe Im lying?
JDHillFan Posted September 18 Posted September 18 3 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Pennsylvania Do you want to provide the data that proves this or would you like me to provide the data? I’m fine either way.
Roundybout Posted September 18 Posted September 18 35 minutes ago, AlBUNDY4TDS said: Why are you badmouthing stoners? Correct, you let the democrat party choose for you. See covid. “thou shalt not criticize the Leader” seems pretty authoritarian to me 33 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Do you want to provide the data that proves this or would you like me to provide the data? I’m fine either way. Didn’t Trump only win by 129,000 votes? I believe the third parties got 110,000 votes there. Between that and people staying home out of principle, Dems could have pulled it. 35 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: So in your mind, there’s just no way that they just feel the Red is a better party? You know the motivation of me, Im a guy who walked away from the Dems because of these dumb policies. Maybe Im lying? Authoritarianism is never a good alternative, so if you believe MAGA is a better party then you were never much of a Dem to begin with.
JDHillFan Posted September 18 Posted September 18 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Roundybout said: Didn’t Trump only win by 129,000 votes? I believe the third parties got 110,000 votes there. Between that and people staying home out of principle, Dems could have pulled it. Isn’t it easier to just speak factually? Had you done so you would not have had to spit up what you have done here. You said Jill Stein cost Harris the election. I asked what swing state did Jill Stein prevent Kamala from winning. You said Pennsylvania. Jill Stein got 35,000 votes in Pennsylvania. Trump received the most votes in Pennsylvania of any presidential candidate ever. The Democrat was not going to win no matter how much you wish it were true. Edited September 18 by JDHillFan
Recommended Posts