Joe Ferguson forever Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 5 minutes ago, SCBills said: Ah ok.. the abortion up To birth, pro-trans everything “sane” wing of the party. Shapiro and Beshear, yes. The other 3 aren’t the same. You’ve already tried those 3 in Georgia with Stacey Abrams Times change. Yesterday was an excellent example. And it only took 1 year. I don't think we'll campaign on those issues. Easy answer to the abortion question is that SCOTUS ruled on it. That doesn't preclude us from trying to expand SCOTUS but it need not be mentioned or highlighted.
boyst Posted 20 hours ago Posted 20 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Times change. Yesterday was an excellent example. And it only took 1 year. I don't think we'll campaign on those issues. Easy answer to the abortion question is that SCOTUS ruled on it. That doesn't preclude us from trying to expand SCOTUS but it need not be mentioned or highlighted. It's a matter of time before expanding scotus is done. It is not being said and the Democrats are smart to be quiet about it. The democratic legal brains (hard to believe there are such) are getting plans formulated to do this. The Dems have found they can't sway public opinion on matters of many things nor force their willpower over law. They're going to simply change it. It's going to be an amazing mental gymnastic maneuver that most liberals are too stupid to understand and will willfully enjoy getting their power. There is only a delay. There is no stopping it. 1
SectionC3 Posted 16 hours ago Posted 16 hours ago 9 hours ago, Wolfgang said: History will show massive election fraud... The rest of what you typed is mostly nonsense... Hoax. 6 hours ago, SCBills said: Why are you saying “nope”.. that’s exactly what Erickson referenced. And Shapiro is 100% correct in that. Gen Z might be more socially conservative but if they can’t get a job, pay rent, afford groceries.. they’ll keep voting back and forth until someone makes that not so. I mostly agree. But socially conservative? I'm not so sure. At least not by the standards of 30 to 40 years ago.
SCBills Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 28 minutes ago, SectionC3 said: Hoax. I mostly agree. But socially conservative? I'm not so sure. At least not by the standards of 30 to 40 years ago. The Overton Window has shifted. Most would consider me socially conservative.. Im pro-gay marriage, but oppose much of the trans agenda (children, womens sports) I believe abortion is the taking of an innocent life, but don’t think it’s politically feasible to ban it, so I’m more along the lines of 15 weeks with exceptions after and think pro-life groups should win over people’s minds instead of legislating I think the pronoun stuff is bs, roll my eyes at land acknowledgement nonsense and think the Democrat base is openly anti-white. This is probably where most men under 40 reside(ish) socially. 1
JFKjr Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 21 hours ago, Wolfgang said: History will show massive election fraud... The rest of what you typed is mostly nonsense... Agree with this.
SCBills Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago But maybe if WE do “Bidenomics”, it will work! Cant believe this Administration is doing the same exact thing we all hated the Biden Administration for doing. 1
IYKYK Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 11 minutes ago, SCBills said: But maybe if WE do “Bidenomics”, it will work! Cant believe this Administration is doing the same exact thing we all hated the Biden Administration for doing. Left wing, right wing same ugly ass bird.
boyst Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago 12 minutes ago, SCBills said: But maybe if WE do “Bidenomics”, it will work! Cant believe this Administration is doing the same exact thing we all hated the Biden Administration for doing. So even if you extrapolate the math on this it is 4% inflated. That is not awful at all. ***** people are stupid. ***** ***** stupid.
Recommended Posts