Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 17 Posted July 17 BMI is a seriously flaw 11 minutes ago, ComradeKayAdams said: I’m sorry to hear about your terrible experience with your doctor. Such is the nature of America’s private health care system. Under Pramila Jayapal’s Medicare for All Act of 2023 (H.R. 3421), all BMI’s would be calculated sans shoes and clothes. Now before I begin grading your quiz, let’s briefly address your subpar posting record in this thread. We’re talking about justice for sexual abuse victims, Leh-nerd, and the prevention of any additional abuse from wealthy and powerful pedophiles. The Epstein files transcend politics. You need to be challenging your creepy MAGA forum friends with greater moral conviction. PPP is not supposed to stand for “Pedophiles, Perverts, and Porn addicts.” If anything, it should be “Posh Pulchritude for Progressives!” And on that note, let’s get to grading your math quiz concerning my bloody Zohran shirts… << pulls out menacing red pen >> << adjusts reading glasses >> << sets default facial expression to one of expected disappointment >> Hmmm…these are actually good responses, Leh-nerd!! You are 100% correct to figure that I’d be perturbed with any foreign labor exploitation that went into the t-shirt production. You truly understand the “Tao of Kay,” so may our friendship live on for at least another day! Hmmm…your answers are actually better than mine because yours don’t make me come across as so shallow... KAY’S OFFICIAL ANSWER KEY FOR LEH-NERD’S FRIENDSHIP QUIZ #2: Step 1: Note that Stokes’s Theorem has no relevance to combinatorial math questions. Another mathematical red herring proffered by Kay? More mathematical mischief afoot?? Yes, indeedy…but do note that this particular version of the theorem technically gives the answer away!!! Step 2: Note that Kay would NEVER wear a t-shirt or crop top out in public if she ballooned to a Leh-nerd-like BMI of 24.8. Knowing Kay (which is the whole point of the quiz), she probably wouldn’t be caught out in public at all looking so supersized. MAYBE wearing an oversized coat and baggy jeans in an emergency outing…? Anyway, the answer to Q1 is “ZERO combinations.” Step 3: Same reasoning as above for Q2… “ZERO combinations.” Alternate Step 2: If you want to practice your combinatorial math, Leh-nerd, Q1 is a basic “choose 5 from 10” problem where the order is not important: 10! / (5!5!) = (10*9*8*7*6*5!) / (5*4*3*2*5!) = 30240 / 120 = 252 shirt style combinations. Alternate Step 3: Note that blood and bleach would ruin the yellow, blue, and grey crop tops. You could still use the red and white ones judiciously, however. So Q2 becomes a “choose 5 from 7” problem: 7! / (2!5!) = (7*6*5!) / (2*5!) = 42 / 2 = 21 shirt style combinations. Congrats, dude! You passed! << punches Leh-nerd anyway for trying to show up Kay with nobler quiz answers >> bmi is a seriously flawed metric. Josh is "overweight" at 28.1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 17 Posted July 17 7 minutes ago, JFKjr said: Yes. Are you referring to the connection with his father, Donald Barr? no, his dad appears to have been a real patriotic ww2. I mean, Bill https://www.npr.org/2022/08/20/1118625157/doj-barr-trump-russia-investigation-memo
JFKjr Posted July 17 Posted July 17 1 minute ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: no, his dad appears to have been a real patriotic ww2. I mean, Bill https://www.npr.org/2022/08/20/1118625157/doj-barr-trump-russia-investigation-memo Here I thought you'd done a deep dive and knew what you were talking about. You were so close to being onto something significant and you turned it into a swing and miss. Oh well.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 17 Posted July 17 (edited) 14 minutes ago, JFKjr said: Here I thought you'd done a deep dive and knew what you were talking about. You were so close to being onto something significant and you turned it into a swing and miss. Oh well. you're confusing me with someone else. He's actually quite good but not as good as he says. He cheats. shocker... Edited July 17 by Joe Ferguson forever
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 17 Posted July 17 2 hours ago, ComradeKayAdams said: I’m sorry to hear about your terrible experience with your doctor. Such is the nature of America’s private health care system. Under Pramila Jayapal’s Medicare for All Act of 2023 (H.R. 3421), all BMI’s would be calculated sans shoes and clothes. That will be of great benefit to some, notably those who believe in the inherent good of a socialist utopia and those who are convinced that the entire clothing/BMI is an integral part of the patriarchy. I learned that my body weight was unrelated to the weight of my clothes early on, like aged 17 or 18. I’m not saying I was a prodigy but certain things I have an affinity for. 2 hours ago, ComradeKayAdams said: Now before I begin grading your quiz, let’s briefly address your subpar posting record in this thread. We’re talking about justice for sexual abuse victims, Leh-nerd, and the prevention of any additional abuse from wealthy and powerful pedophiles. The Epstein files transcend politics. You need to be challenging your creepy MAGA forum friends with greater moral conviction. PPP is not supposed to stand for “Pedophiles, Perverts, and Porn addicts.” If anything, it should be “Posh Pulchritude for Progressives!” And on that note, let’s get to grading your math quiz concerning my bloody Zohran shirts… Outrageous, slanderous and unnecessary. Epstein reflects the worst who walks among us, and that indeed transcends politics. Let’s push this out a couple years and assume your guy Zoloft becomes mayor. I’d take even odds that there will be scandal where he grabbed, touched, fondled or made inappropriate comments about some low level staffer. For goodness sake the sun had not even set on #metoo and #believeall before the people under your tent were trotting about Bill Clinton and not far removed from voting for his perpetually enabling wife. 2 hours ago, ComradeKayAdams said: << pulls out menacing red pen >> << adjusts reading glasses >> << sets default facial expression to one of expected disappointment >> Hmmm…these are actually good responses, Leh-nerd!! You are 100% correct to figure that I’d be perturbed with any foreign labor exploitation that went into the t-shirt production. You truly understand the “Tao of Kay,” so may our friendship live on for at least another day! Hmmm…your answers are actually better than mine because yours don’t make me come across as so shallow... KAY’S OFFICIAL ANSWER KEY FOR LEH-NERD’S FRIENDSHIP QUIZ #2: Step 1: Note that Stokes’s Theorem has no relevance to combinatorial math questions. Another mathematical red herring proffered by Kay? More mathematical mischief afoot?? Yes, indeedy…but do note that this particular version of the theorem technically gives the answer away!!! Step 2: Note that Kay would NEVER wear a t-shirt or crop top out in public if she ballooned to a Leh-nerd-like BMI of 24.8. Knowing Kay (which is the whole point of the quiz), she probably wouldn’t be caught out in public at all looking so supersized. MAYBE wearing an oversized coat and baggy jeans in an emergency outing…? Anyway, the answer to Q1 is “ZERO combinations.” Step 3: Same reasoning as above for Q2… “ZERO combinations.” Alternate Step 2: If you want to practice your combinatorial math, Leh-nerd, Q1 is a basic “choose 5 from 10” problem where the order is not important: 10! / (5!5!) = (10*9*8*7*6*5!) / (5*4*3*2*5!) = 30240 / 120 = 252 shirt style combinations. Alternate Step 3: Note that blood and bleach would ruin the yellow, blue, and grey crop tops. You could still use the red and white ones judiciously, however. So Q2 becomes a “choose 5 from 7” problem: 7! / (2!5!) = (7*6*5!) / (2*5!) = 42 / 2 = 21 shirt style combinations. Congrats, dude! You passed! << punches Leh-nerd anyway for trying to show up Kay with nobler quiz answers >> Thank you, you’re right. I view your entire portfolio of commentary as a giant red herring, Kay, well-intended or otherwise. The socialist bent takes a long and winding road to the same conclusion virtually every time. Wealthy wannabe monarchs preaching togetherness and the greater good while availing themselves of everything they can stuff in their pockets while selling you cheap terlet paper. But, regardless, I enjoy most of our dialogue. Your penchant for violent rhetoric can be troubling, but I’m comfortable that should your Revolution come to pass, and you and Z’s comrades come to get my stuff because they were unable or unwilling to put the effort in to get it themselves you’ll intercede and get me a nice cushy job in a local bread line. 2 hours ago, JFKjr said: Yes. Are you referring to the connection with his father, Donald Barr? I think he’s talking about Rosanne Barr. 1 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted July 17 Posted July 17 7 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Hahahahahahaha Of course! if the Atlantic were a newspaper, I guess it could be. 1
Big Blitz Posted July 17 Author Posted July 17 The timing of “new revelations” is always impeccable. Like you’d almost have to coordinate it. 2 1
JFKjr Posted July 17 Posted July 17 What's this about "Epstein files?" And Libs have an interest in that topic? Did not expect to see that one replace "Ukraine good" and "Biden competent."
muppy Posted July 18 Posted July 18 On 7/15/2025 at 8:13 PM, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Answer to Q1: Irrelevant. The T-shirt likely was made in China. #irony #hotgirlssupportingservitude Beyond that, he definitely seems to be interested in her vector fields, but it has in has nothing to do with the t-shirt. Overalls from Walmart and golf shoes would probably work just as well. I can’t speak to closed curves, I’m a gentleman first. Answer to Q2: Doesn’t matter. When you buy cheap goods from far-off lands, your emotional baggage is packed with shame and self-loathing. Oh—had to visit the doctor a couple weeks back. The nurse asked me to step in the scale, shoes and all, and recorded my weight. Checking my records, I see they logged in my weight fully clothed. Pushed my BMI over 25. I may find a new doctor. Complete b-s. @ComradeKayAdams GURL! You coming? I have SO GOT YOU. Bring your skimpy bikini it's Pool season. lmao the muppster has been working like a slave away from TBD and missed this entire exchange. I'm on team Switzerland. I'm sure that doesn't shock you that much. Reasons being 1. I'm a Lover not fighter 2. reread reason 1 lol Im cheeky tonight. you make me laugh. You are BOMB gurl. give em all barrels and Leo can take it. He's my friend to the end hasta lasagna! m 8 hours ago, Homelander said: this story is awaiting its climatatic, or not, conclusion. enough already with allll the conjecture Show me the LIST. Cough It UP 1 1
Homelander Posted July 18 Posted July 18 7 minutes ago, muppy said: GURL! You coming? I have SO GOT YOU. Bring your skimpy bikini it's Pool season. GURL! Where is the party? 1
Big Blitz Posted July 18 Author Posted July 18 Especially if you coordinated it to get the enemy to care. Which is what I’m leaning to based on how the media was covering it from a “Trump’s base really mad” perspective. The base being mad wasn’t enough. Thus the bizarre comments and tweets from Trump which got more Democrats attention and got them seething to demand a full release. 1
muppy Posted July 18 Posted July 18 21 minutes ago, Homelander said: GURL! Where is the party? lol Im retired. usually at home here in socal. I call it la casa muppetta 😄 I be knowing these 2 for a while. lol fun times in PPP 1
The Frankish Reich Posted July 18 Posted July 18 9 minutes ago, Big Blitz said: Especially if you coordinated it to get the enemy to care. Which is what I’m leaning to based on how the media was covering it from a “Trump’s base really mad” perspective. The base being mad wasn’t enough. Thus the bizarre comments and tweets from Trump which got more Democrats attention and got them seething to demand a full release. Well, that certainly is "counterintuitive."
muppy Posted July 18 Posted July 18 What? okay naranja. You played down a gauntlet there. Grand jury testimony? So by throwing it back to the courts results in just another predictable legal delay. Right? OF COURSE Maybe people will forget about this If it drags on and on and on Im NOT amused. I Want ACTION not more baloney reuniting MAGA? I don't give a **** about reuniting MAGA. I think the quote is true by the way. ANYTHING to avoid just taking the list from Pam Bondi where we were told it was. .just publish the damn thing and be done with it I'm getting tired of this bull#### 1 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 18 Posted July 18 9 hours ago, muppy said: @ComradeKayAdams GURL! You coming? I have SO GOT YOU. Bring your skimpy bikini it's Pool season. lmao the muppster has been working like a slave away from TBD and missed this entire exchange. I'm on team Switzerland. I'm sure that doesn't shock you that much. Reasons being 1. I'm a Lover not fighter 2. reread reason 1 lol Im cheeky tonight. you make me laugh. You are BOMB gurl. give em all barrels and Leo can take it. He's my friend to the end hasta lasagna! m this story is awaiting its climatatic, or not, conclusion. enough already with allll the conjecture Show me the LIST. Cough It UP I wonder if in a post-Mamdani NYC if hot gurl skimpy bikini season will even be a thing. By the time he seizes means of production and distribution, considers the socioeconomic impact with respect to manufacturing, income disparity and impact on climate change, there is a lot to think about. It’s boring af, but we need to think things through. If you and Kay can pull this get together off, document for posterity and I’ll shoot you my email. I’ll back them up on a dvd, or a cloud if I can figure it out. I’d do that for you, yes, I would do that for you both. 1 1
leh-nerd skin-erd Posted July 18 Posted July 18 1 hour ago, muppy said: What? okay naranja. You played down a gauntlet there. Grand jury testimony? So by throwing it back to the courts results in just another predictable legal delay. Right? OF COURSE Maybe people will forget about this If it drags on and on and on Im NOT amused. I Want ACTION not more baloney reuniting MAGA? I don't give a **** about reuniting MAGA. I think the quote is true by the way. ANYTHING to avoid just taking the list from Pam Bondi where we were told it was. .just publish the damn thing and be done with it I'm getting tired of this bull#### Would you support releasing the Grand Jury testimony? During the Smith affair, one of our resident legal experts made the point that in certain cases, “special rules” apply for “electeds”. Then of course, we saw leaked photos purporting to show classified files designed to influence public opinion, something outside what one would assume was standard operating procedure. Then, we had NYS reimagining legal theory to pursue a political opponent. Oh, and unless I’m mistaken, the Carroll civil suit required the temporary pause on traditional thoughts with respect to statutes of limitations. So, Mup, Bondi decides to steamroll this through and deal with consequences. We see the inside baseball version we typically don’t see. Would you support that?
muppy Posted July 18 Posted July 18 19 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: I wonder if in a post-Mamdani NYC if hot gurl skimpy bikini season will even be a thing. By the time he seizes means of production and distribution, considers the socioeconomic impact with respect to manufacturing, income disparity and impact on climate change, there is a lot to think about. It’s boring af, but we need to think things through. If you and Kay can pull this get together off, document for posterity and I’ll shoot you my email. I’ll back them up on a dvd, or a cloud if I can figure it out. I’d do that for you, yes, I would do that for you both. you will will you. well aren't you just fancy and generous. I'm flattered! lmao 13 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said: Would you support releasing the Grand Jury testimony? During the Smith affair, one of our resident legal experts made the point that in certain cases, “special rules” apply for “electeds”. Then of course, we saw leaked photos purporting to show classified files designed to influence public opinion, something outside what one would assume was standard operating procedure. Then, we had NYS reimagining legal theory to pursue a political opponent. Oh, and unless I’m mistaken, the Carroll civil suit required the temporary pause on traditional thoughts with respect to statutes of limitations. So, Mup, Bondi decides to steamroll this through and deal with consequences. We see the inside baseball version we typically don’t see. Would you support that? oh LORD here we go . I will have to get back to you Leo. I hear an timer going off in my oven.. Fresh baked muffins homey entice me more than PPP right now lol hasta lasagna saved by the timer LOL 1 1
Recommended Posts